Cardiovascular changes after extraglottic airway insertion: A prospective, randomized comparison between the laryngeal mask or the new PAXpress

Journal of Clinical Anesthesia

Volumn 16, Issue 5, 2004, Pages 342-346

  Casati, Andrea ^a,c   Vinciguerra, Federico ^a   Spreafico, Emanuela ^a   Marchetti, Chiara ^a   Putzu, Marta ^a   Siliotti, Rossella ^b   Mondello, Epifanio ^a  

^a VITA SALUTE SAN RAFFAELE UNIVERSITY   (Italy)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MESSINA   (Italy)

^c SAN RAFFAELE HOSPITAL   (Italy)

Author keywords

airway; Anesthesia; arterial blood pressure; extraglottic: Laryngeal Mask Airway; general; hemodynamic effects; monitoring; PAXpress; sevoflurane

Indexed keywords

FENTANYL; MIDAZOLAM; OXYGEN; PROPOFOL; SEVOFLURANE;

ABDOMINAL SURGERY; ADULT; AIR; AIRWAY; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ARTERIAL PRESSURE; ARTICLE; CARDIOVASCULAR EFFECT; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIASTOLIC BLOOD PRESSURE; FEMALE; GENERAL ANESTHESIA; HEART RATE; HEMODYNAMICS; HUMAN; LARYNGEAL MASK; MALE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; SYSTOLIC BLOOD PRESSURE; UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL;

ADULT; AGED; ANESTHESIA, GENERAL; BLOOD PRESSURE; FEMALE; GLOTTIS; HEART RATE; HUMANS; INTUBATION, INTRATRACHEAL; LARYNGEAL MASKS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES;

EID: 4544295942     PISSN: 09528180     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2003.09.016     Document Type: Article

References (10)

1. Brimacombe J. The advantages of the LMA over the tracheal tube or face mask a meta-analysis. Can J Anaesth. 42:1995;1017-1023
2. Dimitriou V., Voyagis G.S., Iatrou C., Brimacombe J. A comparison of the PAxpress and face mask plus Guedel airway by inexperienced personnel After mannequin-only training. Anesth Analg. 96:2003;1214-1217
3. Ahmed S.M., Maroof M., Khan R.M., Singhal V., Rizvi K.A. A comparison of the laryngeal mask airway and PA(Xpress) for short surgical procedures. Anaesthesia. 58:2003;42-44
4. Casati A., Cappelleri G., Fanelli G., et al. The pressor response after laryngeal mask or cuffed oropharyngeal airway insertion. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 43:1999;1053-1056
5. Browner W.S., Black D., Newman B., Hulley S.B. Estimating sample size and power. Hulley S.B., Cummings S.R. Designing Clinical Research - An Epidemiologic Approach. 1988;139-150 Williams and Wilkins, Baltimore
6. Braude N., Clements E.A., Hodges U.M., Andrews B.P. The pressor response and laryngeal mask insertion. A comparison with tracheal intubation. Anaesthesia. 44:1989;551-554
7. Casati A., Aldegheri G., Fanelli G., et al. Lightwand intubation does not reduce the increase in intraocular pressure associated with tracheal intubation. J Clin Anesth. 11:1999;216-219
8. Brimacombe J. Analysis of 1500 laryngeal mask uses by one anaesthetist in adults undergoing routine anaesthesia. Anaesthesia. 51:1996;76-80
9. Greenberg R.S., Brimacombe J., Berry A., Gouze V., Piantadosi S., Dake E.M. A randomized controlled trial comparing the cuffed oropharyngeal airway and the laryngeal mask airway in spontaneously breathing anesthetized adults. Anesthesiology. 88:1998;970-977
10. Kanaya N., Hirata N., Kurosawa S., Nakayama M., Namiki A. Differential effects of propofol and sevoflurane on heart rate variability. Anesthesiology. 98:2003;34-40