Value of pelvic MRI in the preoperative diagnosis of endometriosis;Wertigkeit der magnetresonanztomographie (MRT) des beckens in der präoperativen diagnostik der endometriose

RoFo Fortschritte auf dem Gebiet der Rontgenstrahlen und der Bildgebenden Verfahren

Volumn 176, Issue 9, 2004, Pages 1265-1270

  Hauth, Elke A M ^a   Antoch, C ^a   Ruehm, S G ^a   Boing C ^a   Kimmig, R ^a   Forsting, M ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL ESSEN   (Germany)

Author keywords

Endometriosis; Laparoscopic surgery; MR; Pelvis

Indexed keywords

GADOLINIUM PENTETATE;

ADULT; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONTRAST ENHANCEMENT; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING; DIAGNOSTIC VALUE; ENDOMETRIOSIS; EVALUATION; FEMALE; HISTOPATHOLOGY; HUMAN; HUMAN TISSUE; IMAGING SYSTEM; LAPAROSCOPY; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PREOPERATIVE EVALUATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; TREATMENT PLANNING;

ADULT; CONFIDENCE INTERVALS; ENDOMETRIOSIS; FEMALE; HUMANS; LAPAROSCOPY; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MIDDLE AGED; OVARIAN DISEASES; PREOPERATIVE CARE; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; UTERINE DISEASES;

EID: 4544291205     PISSN: 14389029     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1055/s-2004-813401     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Olive DL, Schwartz LB. Endometriosis. N Engl J Med 1993; 328: 1759-1769
2. Friedmann H, Vogelzang RL, Mendelson EB et al. Endometriosis detection by US with laparoscopic correlation. Radiology 1985; 157: 217-220
3. Ascher SM, Agrawal R, Bis KG et al. Endometriosis: appearance and detection with conventional and contrast-enhanced fat-suppressed spin-echo techniques. JMRI 1995; 5: 251-257
4. Bis KG, Vrachliotis TG, Agrawal R et al. Pelvic endometriosis: MR Imaging spectrum with laparascopic correlation and diagnostic pitfalls. Radiographics 1997; 17: 639-655
5. Stratton P, Winkel C, Premkumar A et al. Diagnostic accuracy of laparoscopy magnetic resonance imaging, and histopathologic examinations for the detection of endometriosis. Fertility and Sterility 2003; 79: 1078-1085
6. Guerriero S, Mais V, Ajossa S et al. The role of endovaginal ultrasoud in differentiating endometriomas from other ovarian cysts. Clin Exp Obstet Gynecol 1995; 22: 20-22
7. Guerriero S, Ajossa S, Mais V et al. The diagnosis of endometriomas using colour doppler energy imaging. Hum Reprod 1998; 13: 169-165
8. Patel MD, Feldstein VA, Chen DC et al. Endometriomas: diagnostic performance of US. Radiology 1999; 210: 739-745
9. Bazot M, Cortez A, Darai E et al. Ultrasonography compared with magnetic resonance imaging for the diagnosis of adenomyosis: correlation with histopathology. Human Reproduction 2001; 16: 2427-2433
10. Bazot M, Darai E, de Givry SC et al. Fast breath-hold-T2-weighted MR imaging reduces interobserver variability in the diagnosis of adenomyosis. AJR 2003; 180: 1291-1296
11. Ascher SM, Arnold LL, Patt RH. Adenomyosis: comparison of endovaginal US and transvaginale sonography. Radiology 1994; 190: 803-806
12. Reinhold C, McCarthy S, Bret PM et al. Diffuse adenomyosis: Comparison of endovaginal US and MR imaging with histopathologic correlation. Radiology 1996; 199: 151-158
13. Balleyguier C, Chapron C, Chopin N et al. Abdominal wall and surgical scar endometriosis: Results of Magnetic resonance imaging. Gynecol Obstet Invest 2003; 55: 220-224
14. Umaria N, Olliff JF. MR appearances of bladder endometriosis. The British Journal of Radiology 2000; 73: 733-736
15. Kinkel K, Chapron C, Balleyguier C et al. Magnetic resonance imaging characteristics of deep endometriosis. Human Reprod 1999; 14: 1080-1086
16. Gougoutas C, Siegelman ES, Hunt J et al. Pictorial Essay. Pelvic endometriosis: Various manifestations and MR imaging findings. AJR 2000; 175: 353-358
17. Umaria U, Olliff JF. Pictorial review: Imaging features of pelvic endometriosis. The British Journal of Radiology 2001; 74: 556-562
18. Togashi K, Ozasa H, Konishi I et al. Enlarged uterus: Differentiation between adenomyosis and leiomyoma with MR imaging. Radiology 1989; 171: 531-534
19. Imaoka I, Ascher SM, Sugimura K et al. MR imaging of diffuse adenomyosis changes after GnRH analog therapy. J Magn Reson Imaging 2002; 15: 285-290
20. Siskin GP, Tublin ME, Stainken BF et al. Uterine artery embolisation for the treatment of adenomyosis: Clinical response and evaluation with MR imaging. AJR 2001; 177: 297-302
21. Togashi K, Nishimura K, Kimura I et al. Endometrial cyst: Diagnosis with MR imaging. Radiology 1991; 180: 73-78
22. Takahashi K, Okada S, Ozaki T et al. Diagnosis of pelvic endometriosis by magnetic resonance imaging using "fat-saturation" technique. Fertil Steril 1994; 62: 973-977
23. Zanardi R, Del Frate C, Zuiani C et al. Staging of pelvic endometriosis based on MRI findings versus laparascopic: classification according to the American Fertility Society. Abdom Imaging 2003; 28 (5): 733-742
24. Zanardi R, Del Frate C, Zuiani C et al. Staging of pelvic endometriosis using magnetic resonance imaging compared with the laparoscopic classification oft the American Fertility Society: a prospective study. Radiol Med (Torino) 2003; 105 (4): 326-338
25. Brosens J, Timmermann D, Starzinski-Powitz A et al. Noninvasive diagnosis of endometriosis: the role of imaging markers. Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am 2003; 30 (1): 95-114, viii-ix
26. Keckstein J, Tuttlies F. Die laparoskopische Therapie der Endometriose. Gynäkologe 1997; 30: 473-482
27. Ha HK, Lim YT, Kim HS et al. Diagnosis of pelvic endometriosis: fat suppressed T1 weighted vs conventional MR images. AJR 1994; 163: 127-131