A comparison of oral-nasal balance patterns in speakers who are categorized as "almost but not quite" and "sometimes but not always"

Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal

Volumn 41, Issue 5, 2004, Pages 526-534

  Jones, David L ^a   Morris, Hughlett L ^b   Van Demark, Duane R ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WYOMING   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF IOWA   (United States)

Author keywords

Accelerometry; Cleft palate; Hypernasality; Marginal velopharyngeal inadequacy

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AMPLITUDE MODULATION; AREA UNDER THE CURVE; ARTICLE; CHILD; CLEFT PALATE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONTROLLED STUDY; CRANIOFACIAL MALFORMATION; FUNCTION TEST; HUMAN; PALATOPHARYNGEAL INCOMPETENCE; PERCEPTION; PHONETICS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SPEECH; SPEECH ARTICULATION; TIME PERCEPTION;

ADOLESCENT; ARTICULATION DISORDERS; CHILD; CHILD, PRESCHOOL; CLEFT LIP; CLEFT PALATE; HUMANS; MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS; PULMONARY VENTILATION; RHINOMANOMETRY; SIGNAL PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; SPEECH ACOUSTICS; SPEECH PRODUCTION MEASUREMENT; VELOPHARYNGEAL INSUFFICIENCY; VOICE DISORDERS;

EID: 4544289360     PISSN: 10556656     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1597/03-075.1     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Curtis J. The acoustics of nasalized speech. Cleft Palate J. 1970;7:380-396.
2. Dalston RM, Warren DW. Comparison of TONAR II, pressure-flow, and listener judgments of hypernasality in the assessment of velopharyngeal function. Cleft Palate J. 1986;23:108-115.
3. Fant G. Acoustic Theory of Speech Production. The Hague: Mouton and Co.; 1960.
4. Folkins JW. Issues in speech motor control and their relation to the speech of individuals with cleft palate. Cleft Palate J. 1985;22:106-122.
5. Hardin MA, Morris HL, Van Demark DR. A study of cleft palate speakers with marginal velopharyngeal competence. J Commun Dis. 1986;19:461-473.
6. Horii Y, Lang JE. Distributional analyses of an index of nasal coupling (HONC) in simulated hypernasal speech. Cleft Palate J. 1981;18:279-285.
7. House AS, Stevens KN. Analog studies of the nasalization of vowels. J Speech Hear Dis. 1956:21:218-232.
8. Jones DL. The relationship between temporal aspects of oral-nasal balance and classification of velopharyngeal status in speakers with cleft palate. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2000;37:363-369.
9. Jones DL, Folkins JW, Morris HL. Speech production time and judgments of disordered nasalization in speakers with cleft palate. J Speech Hear Res. 1990;33:458-466.
10. Karnell MP, Schultz K, Canady J. Investigations of a pressure-sensitive theory of marginal velopharyngeal inadequacy. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2001;38: 346-357.
11. Krause CJ, Tharp RF, Morris HL. A comparative study of results of the Von Langenbeck and the V-Y Pushback palatoplasties. Cleft Palate J. 1976;13: 11-19.
12. McWilliams BJ, Glaser ER, Philips BJ, Lawrence C, Lavarato AS, Beery QC, Skolnik MI. A comparative study of four methods of evaluating velopharyngeal adequacy. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1981;68:1-9.
13. McWilliams BJ, Morris HL, Shelton RL. Cleft Palate Speech. 2nd ed. Philadelphia: BC Decker, Inc.; 1990.
14. Moon JB, Smith AE, Folkins JW, Lemke JH, Gartlan M. Coordination of velopharyngeal muscle activity during positioning of the soft palate. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 1994;31:45-55.
15. Morris HL. Cleft palate. In: Weston AJ, ed. Communicative Disorders. Springfield, IL: Thomas; 1972.
16. Morris HL. Marginal velopharyngeal competence. In: Winitz, H., ed. For Clinicians by Clinicians, Articulation Disorders. Baltimore: University Park Press; 1984.
17. Morris HL. Velopharyngeal competence and the Demjen W/V-Y technique. In: Morris HL, ed. The Bratislava Project. Iowa City: University of Iowa Press; 1978.
18. Morris HL, Spriestersbach DC, Darley FL. An articulation test for assessing competency of velopharyngeal closure. J Speech Hear Res. 1961;4:48-55.
19. Redenbaugh MA, Reich AR. Correspondence between an accelerometric nasal/voice ratio and listeners' direct magnitude estimations of hypernasality. J Speech Hear Res. 1985;28:273-281.
20. Smith BE, Guyette TW. Pressure-flow differences in performance during production of the CV syllables /p/ and /pa/. Cleft Palate Craniofac. J. 1996; 33:74-76.
21. SPSS Inc. SPSS/PC + 4.0. Chicago: SPPS; 1990.
22. Templin M, Darley FL. Templin-Darley Tests of Articulation. Iowa City, IA: University of Iowa, Bureau of Educational Research and Service; 1960.
23. Uitenbroek DG. SISA Binomial. Southhampton, U.K.: DG Uitenbroek; 1997. Available at: http://home.clara.net/sisa/t-test.htm. Accessed October 15, 2003.
24. Van Demark DR, Tharp R. A computer program for articulation tests. Cleft Palate J. 1973;10:378-389.
25. Warren DW, Dalston RM, Mayo R. Hypernasality in the presence of "adequate" velopharyngeal function. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 1993;30:150-154.
26. Warren DW, Dalston RM, Trier WC, Holder MB. A pressure-flow technique for quantifying temporal patterns of palatopharyngeal closure. Cleft Palate J. 1985;22:11-19.
27. Zimmermann GN, Karnell MP, Rettaliata P. Articulatory coordination and the clinical profile of two cleft palate speakers. J Phonet. 1984;12:297-306.