An investigation of pH changes of various cements

Quintessence International

Volumn 35, Issue 9, 2004, Pages 753-757

  Duymuş, Zeynep Yeşil ^a  

^a ATATÜRK UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

Author keywords

Cement; pH change; Time

Indexed keywords

TOOTH CEMENT;

ACIDITY; ARTICLE; PH; PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY;

DENTAL CEMENTS; HYDROGEN-ION CONCENTRATION; MATERIALS TESTING; POLYCARBOXYLATE CEMENT; SILICATE CEMENT; TIME FACTORS; ZINC OXIDE; ZINC OXIDE-EUGENOL CEMENT; ZINC PHOSPHATE CEMENT;

EID: 4544286249     PISSN: 00336572     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Yeşil Z. The comparison of bond strength of three different adhesive cements [in Turkish]. Atatürk Üniv Diş Hek Fak Derg 1998;8:34-38.
2. Duymuş Yeşil Z. The examination of retentive strength of four temporary cements [in Turkish]. Ege Üniv Diş Hek Fak Derg 2000;21:121-126.
3. Fried LA. Handling properties of a zinc polycarboxylate cement. Br Dent J 1969;126:359-364.
4. Mortimer KV, Tranter TC. A preliminary laboratory evaluation of polycarboxylate cements. Br Dent J 1969;126:365-370.
5. Phillips RW, Swarts ML, Lund MS, Moore BK, Vickery J. In vivo disintegration of luting cemets. J Am Dent Assoc 1987;114:489-492.
6. Phillips RW. Skinner's Science of Dental Materials, ed 8. Philadelphia: Saunders, 1973:466-497.
7. Smith DC. Dental cements. Current status and future prospects. Dent Clin North Am 1983;27:763-792.
8. Craig RG, Peyton FA. Restorative Dental Materials, ed 8. St Louis: Mosby, 1980:131-150.
9. Smith DC, Dorin Ruse N. Acidity of glass-ionomer cements during setting and its relation to pulp sensitivity. J Am Dent Assoc 1986;112:654-657.
10. Staehle HJ, Ziegler A. Diffusion of hydrogen hydroxyl and calcium ions through the dentin of human teeth. Dtsch Zahnunärztl Z 1988;43:160-167.
11. Klötzer WT, Tronstad L, Dowden WE, Langeland K. Polycarboxylate cement in physical and biological tests. Dtsch Zahnunärztl Z 1970;25:877-886.
12. Nicholson JW, Aggarwal A, Czarnecka B, Limanowska-Shaw H. The rate of change of pH of lactic acid exposed to glass-ionomer dental cements. Bio Mater 2000;21:1989-1993.
13. Charlton DG, Moore BK, Swartz ML. Direct surface pH determinations of setting cements. Oper Dent 1991;16:231-238.
14. Patel M, Tawfik H, Myint Y, Brocklehurst D, Nicholson JW. Factors affecting the ability of dental cements to alter the pH of lactic acid solutions. J Oral Rehabil 2000;27:1030-1033.
15. Phillips RW, Swartz ML, Norman RD. Materials for the Practicing Dentist. St Louis: Mosby, 1969:460-463.
16. Demmel HJ. Studies on cement base materials. Dtsch Zahnunärztl Z 1971;26:235-240.
17. Demmel HJ. The change in pH values in phosphate polyacrylate cement. Dtsch Zahnunärztl Z 1970;25:295-297.
18. Gorodovsky S, Zindan O. Retentive strength, disintegration, and marginal quality of luting cements. J Prosthet Dent 1992;68:269-274.
19. Maezima K, Hoashi S, Sekiguchi K, et al. Comparative evaluation of carboxylate cements. III. Working and setting times. J Jap Res Soc Dent Mater Appl 1973;29:40-43.
20. Markowitz K, Moynihan M, Lia M, Kim S. Biologic properties of eugenol and zinc oxide-eugenol. A clinically oriented review. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1992;73:729-737.
21. Trowbridge HO. Intradental sensory units: Physiological and clinical aspects. J Endod 1985;11:489-498.
22. Campagni WV. Technique for cementation of provisional restorations. J Prosthet Dent 1985;54:13-15.
23. New American Dental Association specification No. 30 for dental zinc oxide-eugenol type restorative materials. J Am Dent Assoc 1977;95:992-995.
24. O'Brien WJ, Ryge G. An outline of dental cements and their selection. Philadelphia: Saunders, 1978:152-170.
25. Iwako M, Saito C, Shimizu Y, Matano R. Pulpal reactions of zinc polycarboxylate cements. Jap J Conc Dent 1972;14:254-258.
26. Truelove EL, Mitchell DF, Phillips RW. Biologic evaluation of a carboxylate cement. J Dent Res 1971;50:166.
27. Iwaku M, Takatsu T, Fusayama T. Comparison of three luting agents. J Prosthet Dent 1980;43:423-425.
28. Pameijer CH, Nilger K. Long-term clinical evaluation of three luting materials. Swed Dent J 1994;18:59-67.
29. Johnson GH, Powell LV, Derouen TA. Evaluation and control of post-cementation pulpal sensitivity: Zinc phosphate and glass ionomer luting cements. J Am Dent Assoc 1993;124:39-46.
30. McComb D. Adhesive luting cements-classes, criteria, and usage. Compend Contin Educ Dent 1996;17:759-773.
31. Ben-Amar A, Liberman R, Apatowsky U, Pilo R. pH changes of glass-ionomer lining materials at various time intervals. J Oral Rehabil 1999;26:847-852.
32. Brooks ES, Miller BH, Nakajima H, Guo I. Manipulation effects on fluoride release from chemically-cured and resin-modified glass ionomers. Am J Dent 1997;10:120-122.
33. Modesto A, Chevitarese O, Cury JA, Vieira AR. Vari Glass fluoride release and uptake by an adjacent tooth. Am J Dent 1997;10:123-127.
34. Tyas MJ. Cariostatik effect of glass ionomer cements: A five-year clinical study. Aust Dent J 1991;36:236-239.
35. McLean JW. Alternatives to amalgam alloys. Br Dent J 1984;157:432-433.
36. American Dental Association Council on dental materials, instruments, and equipment. Reported sensitivity to glass ionomer luting cements. J Am Dent Assoc 1984;109:476.
37. Plant CG, Browne RM, Knibbs PJ, Britson AS, Sorohan T. Pulpal effects of glass ionomer cements. Int Endod J 1984;17:51-59.