The factors affecting airspace capacity in Europe: A cross-sectional time-series analysis using simulated controller workload data

Journal of Navigation

Volumn 57, Issue 3, 2004, Pages 385-405

  Majumdar, Arnab ^a   Ochieng, Washington Y ^a   McAuley, Gérard ^b   Lenzi, Jean Michel ^b   Lepadatu, Catalin ^b  

^a IMPERIAL COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

^b EUROCONTROL   (Belgium)

Author keywords

Air Traffic Control; Capacity; Workload

Indexed keywords

AIR TRAFFIC CONTROL;

EID: 4544279894     PISSN: 03734633     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1017/S0373463304002863     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. Arthur D. Little Limited (2000). Study into the potential impact of changes in technology on the development of air transport in the UK - Final Report to Department of the Environment, Transport and Regions (DETR), DETR Contract No. PPAD 9/91/14, London U.K.
2. ATAG (1992) European traffic forecasts, ATAG: Geneva, Switzerland.
3. Baltagi, B. H. (1995) econometric analysis of panel data, John Wiley & Sons Ltd, Chichester.
4. Bhargava, A. Franzini, L and W. Narendranathan (1982), Serial Correlation and the Fixed Effects Model, Review of Economic Studies 49, pp. 533-549.
5. th Europe/USA Air Traffic Management R&D Seminar, Budapest, Hungary 23-27 June, 2003.
6. Cliff A. D. and V. K. Ord (1981) Spatial processes: models and applications, Pion, London.
7. The Department of Environment Transport Regions (2000) Public Private Partnership for National Air Traffic Services Limited, DETR, London.
8. ECAC (1990) ECAC Strategy for the 1990s, ECAC, Paris.
9. ECAC (1998) Integrating air traffic management - the European experience, Paper presented by 36 Contracting States of ECAC to the World-wide CNS/ATM Systems Implementation Conference, Rio de Janeiro, May 1998.
10. EUROCONTROL (1991) European Air Traffic Control Harmonization and Integration Programme (EATCHIP), Phase I Report, EUROCONTROL, Brussels, Belgium.
11. EUROCONTROL EXPERIMENTAL CENTRE (1995) RAMS system overview document, Model Based Simulations Sub-Division, EUROCONTROL, Bretigny-sur-Orge, France.
12. EUROCONTROL EXPERIMENTAL CENTRE (1996a) RAMS User Manual Version 2.1, EEC/ RAMS/UM/OO13, Model Based Simulations Sub-Division, EUROCONTROL, Bretigny-sur-Orge, France.
13. EUROCONTROL EXPERIMENTAL CENTRE (1996b) Evaluation of RAMS version 2.0, Internal EEC Note No. 1, EEC Task BM12, Model Based Simulations Sub-Division, EUROCONTROL, Bretigny-sur-Orge, France.
14. EUROCONTROL EXPERIMENTAL CENTRE (1996c) AMS (Air Traffic Control Model Simulation Studies) - an introduction for potential users, Internal EEC Note No. 2/AMS/1996, Model Based Simulations Sub-Division, EUROCONTROL, Bretigny-sur-Orge, France.
15. EUROCONTROL (1998) Air Traffic Management Strategy for 2000+, Volumes 1&2, EUROCONTROL, Belgium.
16. EUROCONTROL (1999a) Model simulation of Bulgarian airspace, EEC Note 4/99, Project SIM-F-El (F7), ATM Operational & Simulation Expertise Group, EUROCONTROL, Bretigny-sur-Orge, France.
17. EUROCONTROL (1999b) Model Simulation of the Czech Republic Airspace, EEC Note 5/99, Project SIM-F-E1 (F24), ATM Operational & Simulation Expertise Group, EUROCONTROL, Bretigny-sur-Orge, France.
18. EUROCONTROL (1999c) Central Europe fast time simulation, EEC Note 3/99, Project SIM-F-E1 (F18), ATM Operational & Simulation Expertise Division, EUROCONTROL, Bretigny-sur-Orge, France.
19. EUROCONTROL (1999d) RAMS Simulation of Warsaw FIR, EEC Note 13/99, Project SIM-F-E1 (F28), ATM Operational & Simulation Expertise Division, EUROCONTROL, Bretigny-sur-Orge, France.
20. The European Commission (2001) A single European sky in 2004: towards a more qfficient and safer airspace, (Report to Parliament, March 2001), DN: IP/01/1398, Brussels.
21. The European Commission (2003) Study on the implementation rules of economic regulation within the framework of the implementation of the single European sky, Final Report, TREN/f2/28-2002, Brussels.
22. The Financial Times (2003). EU closer to single sky for air traffic control, 10 December 2003.
23. Gawron, V. J., Scheflett, S. G. and J. C. Miller (1989) Measures of in-flight workload, in R. S. Jensen (ed.) Aviation Psychology, 240-87. Gower: Brookfield, Virginia.
24. th Europe/USA Air Traffic Management R&D Seminar, Budapest, Hungary 23-27 June, 2003.
25. Hopkin, V. D. (1995) Human factors in air traffic control, Taylor & Francis, London.
26. Jorna, P. G. A. M. (1991). Operator workload as a limiting factor in complex systems, Automation and System's Issues, (eds.) J. Wise and D. Hopkin, NATO ASI series.
27. Lamoureux, T. (1999) The influence of aircraft proximity data on the subjective, mental workload of controllers in the air traffic control task, forthcoming, Ergonomics.
28. Lange, D G F (1989) The Crisis of European Air Traffic Control: Costs and Solutions Wilmer, Cutler and Pickering, London/Brussels/Washington DC.
29. Laudeman, I. V., Shelden S. G., Branstrom, R. and C. L. Brasil (1998) Dynamic Density: an air traffic management metric, NASA-TM-1998-112226, April 1998.
30. Majumdar, A. and W. Y. Ochieng (2002), The factors affecting air traffic controller workload: a multivariate analysis based upon simulation modelling of controller workload, Transportation Research Record, 1788, 58-69.
31. Majumdar, A. and J. W. Polak (2001) A Framework for the Estimation of European Airspace Capacity using a Model of Controller Workload, Transportation Research Records, 1744, 30-43.
32. th International Aerospace Conference, Amsterdam, the Netherlands, 1997.
33. nd Europe/USA Air Traffic Management R&D Seminar, Saclay, France 17-20 June, 1997.
34. th Europe/USA Air Traffic Management R&D Seminar, Budapest, Hungary 23-27 June, 2003.
35. Mills, S. H., Pfleiderer, E and C. Manning (2002) POWER: Objective Activity and Taskload Assessment in En Route Air Traffic Control, FAA Report DOT/FAA/AM-02/2.
36. Mogford, R. H., J. A. Guttman, S. L. Morrow and P. Kopardekar (1995) The complexity construct in air traffic control: a review and synthesis of the literature, DOT/FAA/CT-TN92/22, Department of Transportation/ Federal Aviation Administration Technical Center, Atlantic City, NJ.
37. Rodgers, M. D., Mogford, R. H. and L. S. Mogford (1998) The relationship of sector characteristics to operational errors, FAA Report DOT/FAA/AM-98/14.
38. nd USA/EUROPE Air Traffic Management R&D Seminar, Orlando, Florida, December 1998.
39. Stamp, R. G. (1992) The DORATASK method of assessing ATC sector capacity - an overview, DORA Communication 8934, Issue 2, Civil Aviation Authority, London.
40. Upton, G. J. G. and B. Fingleton (1985) Spatial data analysis by example, Volume 1: Point pattern and quantitative data, Wiley, Chicester, U.K.
41. Wickens C. D., A. S. Mavor. and J. P. McGee (Eds) (1997) Flight to the Future: human factors in air traffic control, National Academy Press, Washington DC, USA.
42. Verbeek, M (2000) A Guide to Modern Econometrics, John Wiley & Sons Ltd, Chichester, UK.