The File Mover: An efficient data transfer system for grid applications

2004 IEEE International Symposium on Cluster Computing and the Grid, CCGrid 2004

Volumn , Issue , 2004, Pages 625-632

  Anglano, Cosimo ^a   Canonico, Massimo ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF EASTERN PIEDMONT   (Italy)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ALGORITHMS; BANDWIDTH; INFORMATION ANALYSIS; INTERNET; KNOWLEDGE ACQUISITION; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; NETWORK PROTOCOLS; OPTIMIZATION; ROUTERS; TELECOMMUNICATION TRAFFIC;

GRID APPLICATIONS; IP ROUTING PROTOCOLS; TERABYTES; TRANSPORT-LEVEL PROTOCOLS;

DATA TRANSFER;

EID: 4544259891     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (33)

1. Iperf: The TCP/UDP Bandwidth Measurement Tool. http://dast.nlanr.net/Projects/Iperf.
2. The bbFTP - Large Files Transfer Protocols Web Site. http://doc.in2p3.fr/bbftp.
3. A. Akella and S. Seshan and A. Shaikh. An Empirical Evaluation of Wide-Area Internet Bottleneck. In Proc. of ACM SIGMETRICS '03, San Diego, California, USA, June 2003.
4. Y. Chen, D. Bindel, and R.H. Katz. Tomography-based Overlay Network Monitoring. In Proc. of ACM IMC 2003, 2003.
5. T.H. Cormen, C.L. Leiserson, and R.L. Rivest. Introduction to Algorithms, 2nd Edition. MIT Press, 2001.
6. D.G. Andersen and H. Balakrishnan and M.F. Kaashoek and R.Morris. Resilient Overlay Networks. In Proc. of 18th ACM Symp. on Operating Systems Principles, Banff, Canada, Oct. 2001.
7. P.M. Dickens. FOBS: A Lightweight Communication Protocol for Grid Computing. In Proc. of Europar 2003, Klagenfurt, Austria, August 2003.
8. A. Chervenak et al. The Data Grid: Towards an Architecture for the Distributed Management and Analysis of Large Scientific Datasets. Journal of Network and Computer Applications, 23:187-200, 2001.
9. B. Allcock et al. Data Management and Transfer in High-Performance Computational Grid Environments. Parallel Computing, 28(5):749-771, May 2002.
10. B. Chandra et al. End-to-End WAN Service Availability. In Proc. of 3rd Usenix Symp. on Internet Technologies and Systems (USITS), pages 97-108, San Francisco, CA, February 2001.
11. B. White et al. An Integrated Experimental Environment for Distributed Systems and Networks. In Proc. of 5th Symp. on Operating Systems Design and Implementation, Boston, MA, USA, Dec. 2002.
12. S. Savage et al. Detour: A Case for Informed Internet Routing and Transport. lEEE Micro, 19(1):50-59, Jan. 1999.
13. S. Savage et al. The End-to-End Effects of Internet Path Selection. In Proc. of ACM SIGCOMM, pages 289-299, Boston, MA, 1999.
14. G. Jin and B. Tierney. Netest: A Tool to Measure the Maximum Burst Size, Available Bandwidth and Achievable Throughput. In Proc. of Int. Conf. on Information Technology Research and Education, Newark, NJ, USA, Aug. 2003.
15. Y. Gu, X. Hong, M. Mazzucco, and R.L. Grossman. SABUL: A High Performance Data Transfer Protocol. http://www.dataspaceweb.net/papers.htm, 2003. Submitted for publication.
16. A. Hanushevsky, A. Trunov, and L. Cottrell. Peer-to-Peer Computing for Secure High Performance Data Copying. In Proc. of the 2001 Int. Conf. on Computing in High Energy and Nuclear Physics (CHEP 2001), Beijng, China, September 2001.
17. J. Strauss and D. Katabi and F. Kasashoek. A Measurement Study of Available Bandwidth Estimation Tools. In Proc. of the ACM Conf. on Internet Measurement, Miami Beach, Florida, USA, October 2003.
18. D. Katabi, I. Bazzi, and X. Yang. A Passive Approach for Detecting Shared Bottlenecks. In Proc. of IEEE Int. Conf. on Computer Communications and Networks, Arizona,USA, 2001.
19. C. Labovitz, A. Ahuja, A. Bose, and F. Jahanian. Delayed Internet Routing Convergence. In Proc. of ACM SIGCOMM, pages 175-187, Stockolm, Sweden, September 2000.
20. M. Jain and C. Dovrolis. End-to-End Available Bandwidth: Measurement Methodology, Dynamics, and Relation with TCP Throughput. In Proc. of ACM SIGCOMM '02, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA, August 2002.
21. M. Mathis and R. Reddy. Enabling High Performance Data Transfers, http://www.psc.edu/networking/perf_tune.html.
22. H.B. Newman, M.H. Ellisman, and J.H. Orcutt. Data-Intensive E-Science Frontier Research. Communications of the ACM, 46(11), Nov. 2003.
23. V. Paxson. End-to-End Routing Behavior in the Internet. In Proc. of ACM SIGCOMM, pages 25-38, Stanford, CA, August 1996.
24. V. Paxson. End-to-End Internet Packet Dynamics. In Proc. ACM SIGCOMM, pages 139-152, Cannes, France, September 1997.
25. J. Plank, S. Atcheley, Y. Ding, and M. Beck. Algorithms for High Performance, Wide-Area, Distributed File Downloads. Parallel Processing Letters, 13(2), June 2003.
26. K. Ranganathan and I. Foster. Simulation Studies of Computation and Data Scheduling Algorithms for Data Grids. Journal of Grid Computing, 1(1):53-62, 2003.
27. N.S.V. Rao. Multiple Paths for End-to-End Delay Minimization in Distributed Computing Over Internet. In Proc. of Supercomputing 2001, 2001.
28. D. Rubenstein, J. Kurose, and D. Towsley. Detecting Shared Congestion of Flows Via End-to-end Measurement. IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking, 10(3), June 2002.
29. H. Tangmunarunkit, R. Govindan, S. Shenker, and D. Estrin. The Impact of Routing Policy on Internet Paths. In Proc. IEEE Infocom '01, Anchorage, Alaska, April 2001.
30. The Globus Team. GridFTP: Universal Data Transfer for the Grid. http://www.globus.org. White Paper.
31. B. Tierney. TCP tuning Guide for Distributed Applications on Wide Area Networks. Usenix ;login Journal, page 33, Feb. 2001.
32. S. Wallace. Tsunami File Transfer Protocol. In Proc. of First Int. Workshop on Protocols for Fast Long-Distance Networks, CERN, Geneva, Switzerland, February 2003.
33. R. Wolski. Dynamically Forecasting Network Performance Using the Network Weather Service. Cluster Computing, 1(1):119-132, Jan. 1998.