Global knowledge management research: A bibliometric analysis

Scientometrics

Volumn 61, Issue 2, 2004, Pages 171-190

  Gu, Yinian ^a  

^a TSINGHUA UNIVERSITY   (China)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 4544235639     PISSN: 01389130     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1023/B:SCIE.0000041647.01086.f4     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. BARCLAY, R. O., MURRAY, P. C. (1997), What Is Knowledge Management? [On-line]. Available: http://www.media-access.com/whatis.html
2. BASU, A., AGGARWAL, R. (2001), International collaboration in science in India and its impact on institutional performance. Scientometrics, 52 (3) : 379-394.
3. BIRD, J. E. (1997), Authorship patterns in marine mammal science, 1985-1993. Scientometrics, 39 (1) : 99-105.
4. BORDONS, M., FERNANDEZ, M. T., GOMEZ, I. (2002), Advantages and limitations in the use of impact factor measures for the assessment of research performance in a peripheral country. Scientometrics, 53 (2) : 195-206.
5. BORDONS, M., GOMEZ, I., FERNANDEZ, M. T., ZULUETA, M. A., MENDEZ, A. (1996), Local, domestic and international scientific collaboration in biomedical research. Scientometrics, 37 (2) : 279-295.
6. BOVIER, P. A., GUILLAIN, H., PERNEGER, T. V. (2001), Productivity of medical research in Switzerland. Journal of Investigative Medicine, 49 (1) : 77-84.
7. CALLAHAM, M., WEARS, R. L., WEBER, E. (2002), Journal prestige, publication bias, and other characteristics associated with citation of published studies in peer-reviewed journals. JAMA-Journal of the American Medical Association, 287 (21) : 2847-2850.
8. CRONIN, B., SHAW, D. (1999), Citation, funding acknowledgement and author nationality relationships in four information science journals. Journal of Documentation, 55 (4) : 402-408.
9. GLÄNZEL, W. (2002), Coauthorship patterns and trends in the sciences (1980-1998): a bibliometric study with implications for database indexing and search strategies. Library Trends, 50 (3) : 461-473.
10. GLÄNZEL, W., SCHUBERT, A., CZERWON, H. J. (1999), An item-by-item subject classification of papers published in multidisciplinary and general journals using reference analysis. Scientometrics, 44 (3) : 427-439.
11. GOLDER, W. (2000), Who controls the controllers? Ten statements on the so-called impact factor. Onkologie, 23 (1) : 73-75.
12. GRANGE, R. I. (1999), National bias in citations in urology journals: parochialism or availability? BJU international, 84 (6) : 601-603.
13. ICASIT (2003a), KM Resources: KM Companies. [On-line]. Available: http://www.icasit.org/km/resources/companies.htm
14. ICASIT (2003b), KMCentral: KM Degree Programs. [On-line]. Available: http://www.icasit.org/km/academia/kmdegrees.htm
15. INGWERSEN, P., LARSEN, B., WORMELL, I. (2000), Applying diachronic citation analysis to research program evaluations. In: B. CRONIN, H. BARSKY ATKINS (Eds), The Web of Knowledge: A Festschrift in Honor of Eugene Garfield. ASIS Monograph Series. Metford, NJ: Information Today, Inc., 373-387.
16. KATZ, J. S., HICKS, D. (1997), How much is a collaboration worth? A calibrated bibliometric model. Scientometrics, 40 (3) : 541-554.
17. KING, J. T. (2000), How many neurosurgeons does it take to write a research article? Authorship proliferation in neurosurgical research. Neurosurgery, 47 (2) : 435-440.
18. LEE, K. P., SCHOTLAND, M., BACCHETTI, P., BERO, L. A. (2002), Association of journal quality indicators with methodological quality of clinical research articles. JAMA-Journal of the American Medical Association, 287 (21) : 2805-2808.
19. MCCAIN, K.W. (1998), Neural network research in context: a longitudinal journal cocitation analysis of an emerging interdisciplinary field. Scientometrics, 41 (3) : 389-410.
20. MCCAIN, K.W., WHITNEY, J. P. (1994), Contrasting assessments of interdisciplinarity in emerging specialties: the case of neural networks research. Knowledge: Creation, Diffusion, Utilization, 15 (3) : 285-306.
21. MCINERNEY, C. (2002), Knowledge management and the dynamic nature of knowledge. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 53 (12) : 1009-1018.
22. MOED, H. F., LUWEI, M., NEDERHOF, A. J. (2002), Towards research performance in the humanities. Library Trends, 50 (3) : 498-520.
23. OECD (2001), Science, Technology and Industry Scoreboard - Towards a Knowledge-Based Economy. [On-line]. Available: http://www1.oecd.org/ publications/e-book/92-2001-04-1-2987/gA-1-a.htm
24. POULIN, R. (2002), Qualitative and quantitative aspects of recent research on helminth parasites. Journal of Helminthology, 76 (4) : 373-376.
25. RENNIE, D., YANK, V., EMANUEL, L. (1997), When authorship fails - a proposal to make contributors accountable. JAMA-Journal of the American Medical Association, 278 (7) : 579-585.
26. ROUSSEAU, R., VAN HOOYDONK, G. (1996), Journal production and journal impact factors. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 47 (10) : 775-780.
27. SCHOONBAERT, D., ROELANTS, G. (1996), Citation analysis for measuring the value of scientific publications: quality assessment tool or comedy of errors? Tropical Medicine & International Health, 1 (6) : 739-752.
28. SEGLEN, P. O., AKSNES, D. W. (2000), Scientific productivity and group size: A bibliometric analysis of Norwegian microbiological research. Scientometrics, 49 (1) : 125-143.
29. SKYRME, D. J. (1998a), Beneath the Fad: The Future of Knowledge Management. [On-line]. Available: http://www.skyrme.com/updates/u20.htm
30. SKYRME, D. J. (1998b), Knowledge Management - Three Years On: Are We Confused? [On-line]. Available: http://www.skyrme.com/updates/u25.htm#km3
31. SLONE, R. M. (1996), Coauthors' contributions to major papers published in the AJR: frequency of undeserved coauthorship. American Journal of Roentgenology, 167 (3) : 571-579.
32. STEGMANN, J., GROHMANN, G. (2001), Citation rates, knowledge export and international visibility of dermatology journals listed and not listed in the Journal Citation Reports. Scientometrics, 50 (3) : 483-502.
33. SVEIBY, K. (2001), What is Knowledge Management? [On-line]. Available: http://www.sveiby.com/articles/KnowledgeManagement.html
34. TIJSSEN, R. J. W. (1992), Cartography of Science: Scientometric Mapping with Multidimensional Scaling Methods. Leiden: DSWO Press, Leiden University.
35. TOMOV, D. T., MUTAFOV, H. G. (1996), Comparative indicators of interdisciplinarity in modern science. Scientometrics, 37 (2) : 267-278.
36. TRUESWELL, R. L. (1969), Some behavioral patterns of library users: the 80/20 rule. Wilson Library Bulletin, 43 (5): 458-461.
37. VAN DEN BESSELAAR, P., HEIMERIKS, G. (2001), Disciplinary, multidisciplinary, interdisciplinary - concepts and indicators. In: M. DAVIS, C. S. WILSON (Eds), Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Scientometrics and Informetrics. Sydney: Bibliometric & Informetric Research Group (BIRG), UNSW.
38. VAN LEEUWEN, T., TIJSSEN, R. (2000), Interdisciplinary dynamics of modern science: analysis of cross-disciplinary citation flows. Research Evaluation, 9 (3) : 183-187.
39. VERBEEK, A., DEBACKERE, K., LUWEL, M., ZIMMERMANN, E. (2002), Measuring progress and evolution in science and technology - I: the multiple uses of bibliometric indicators. International Journal of Management Reviews, 4 (2) : 179-211.