Combining 2D and 3D views for orientation and relative position tasks

Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - Proceedings

Volumn , Issue , 2004, Pages 73-80

  Tory, Melanie ^a   Möller, Torsten ^a   Atkins, M Stella ^a   Kirkpatrick, Arthur E ^a  

^a SIMON FRASER UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

Author keywords

2D and 3D visualization; Display design; Empirical study; Experiment; Orientation and relative position tasks

Indexed keywords

ALGORITHMS; COMPUTER AIDED DESIGN; GRAPHICAL USER INTERFACES; IMAGE ANALYSIS; IMAGE QUALITY; INTERACTIVE COMPUTER GRAPHICS;

DISPLAY DESIGN; RELATIVE POSITION TASKS; THREE DIMENSIONAL VISUALIZATION; TWO DIMENSIONAL VISUALIZATION;

THREE DIMENSIONAL COMPUTER GRAPHICS;

EID: 4544232117     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1145/985692.985702     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (15)

1. Carpendale, M. S. T., Cowperthwaite, D. J., Tigges, M., Fall, A., Fracchia, F. D. The tarais: A visual exploration environment for landscape dynamics. Proc. Visual Data Exploration and Analysis VI, SPIE vol. 3643 (1999).
2. Kurzion, Y., Yagel, R. Interactive Space Deformation with Hardware-Assisted Rendering. IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications, 17, 5 (1997), 66-77.
3. McGuffin, M.J., Tancau, L., Balakrishnan, R. Using Deformations for Browsing Volumetric Data. Proc. IEEE Visualization, 2003, 401-408.
4. Park, S.H., Woldstad, J.C. Multiple Two-Dimensional Displays as an Alternative to Three-Dimensional Displays in Telerobotic Tasks. Human Factors, 42, 4 (2000), 592-603.
5. Shepard, R.N., Metzler, J. Mental rotation of three-dimensional objects. Science, 171, (1971), 701-703.
6. Springmeyer, R.R., Blattner, M.M., Max, N.L. A Characterization of the Scientific Data Analysis Process. Proc. IEEE Visualization, 1992, 235-242.
7. Smallman, H., St. John, M., Oonk, H., Cowen, M. Information Availability in 2D and 3D Displays. IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications, 21, 5 (2001), 51-57.
8. St. John, M., Cowen, M.B., Smallman, H.S., Oonk, H.M. The use of 2D and 3D displays for shape-understanding versus relative-position tasks. Human Factors, 43, 1 (2001), 79-98.
9. St. John, M., Smallman, H.S., Bank, T.E., Coweri, M.B. Tactical Routing Using Two-Dimensional and Three-Dimensional Views of Terrain. Technical Report 1849, SSC San Diego Technical Reports, 2001.
10. Tory, M. Mental Registration of 2D and 3D Visualizations (An Empirical Study). Proc. IEEE Visualization, 2003, 371-378.
11. Tory, M. and Swindells, C. Comparing ExoVis, Orientation Icon, and In-Place 3D Visualization Techniques. Proc. Graphics Interface, 2003, 57-64.
12. Van Orden, K.F., Broyles, J.W. Visuospatial Task Performance as a Function of Two- and Three-Dimensional Display Presentation Techniques. Displays, 21, 1 (2000), 17-24.
13. Wanger, L.R., Ferwerda, J.A. and Greenberg, D.P. Perceiving spatial relationships in computer-generated images. IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications, 12, 3 (1992), 44-58.
14. Wickens, C.D., Merwin, D.H., Lin, E.L. Implications of Graphics Enhancements for the Visualization of Scientific Data: Dimensional integrality, Stereopsis, Motion, and Mesh. Human Factors, 36, 1 (1994), 44-61.
15. Wong, P.C., Bergeron, D. Brushing Techniques for Exploring Volume Datasets. Proc. IEEE Visualization, 1997, 429-432.