Endogeneity bias in the absence of unobserved heterogeneity

Annals of Epidemiology

Volumn 14, Issue 8, 2004, Pages 561-565

  Berg, Gregory D ^a,b   Mansley, Edward C ^a  

^a McKesson Corporation   (United States)

^b McKesson   (United States)

Author keywords

COV; covariance; Data Interpretation; Econometric Models; Epidemiologic Methods; instrumental variables; IV; Multivariate Analysis; OLS; ordinary least squares; plim; probability limit; QED; Quod erat demonstrandum (which was to be demonstrated); Statistics

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; ASSAY; GENETIC HETEROGENEITY; MATHEMATICAL ANALYSIS; MATHEMATICAL MODEL; MATHEMATICAL PARAMETERS; MONTE CARLO METHOD; OBSERVATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REGRESSION ANALYSIS;

ALGORITHMS; BIAS (EPIDEMIOLOGY); DATA INTERPRETATION, STATISTICAL; EPIDEMIOLOGIC METHODS; MODELS, ECONOMETRIC; MONTE CARLO METHOD; MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS; OBSERVER VARIATION;

EID: 4544224055     PISSN: 10472797     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.annepidem.2003.09.020     Document Type: Article

References (6)

1. Engle R.F., Hendry D.F., Richard J.F. Exogeneity. Econometrica. 51:1983;277-304
2. Briscoe J., Atkin J., Guilkey D. People are not passive acceptors of threats to health: Endogeneity and its consequences. Int J Epidemiol. 19:1990;147-153
3. Zohoori N., Savitz D.A. Econometric approaches to epidemiologic data: Relating endogeneity and unobserved heterogeneity to confounding. Ann Epidemiol. 7:1997;251-257
4. Zohoori N. Does endogeneity matter? A comparison of empirical analyses with and without control for endogeneity. Ann Epidemiol. 7:1997;258-266
5. Greene W. Econometric Analysis. 3rd ed.:1997;Prentice Hall, New Jersey
6. Kennedy P. A Guide to Econometrics. 3rd ed.:1992;The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA