Anogenital dermatitis in patients referred for patch testing: Retrospective analysis of cross-sectional data from the North American Contact Dermatitis Group, 1994-2004

Archives of Dermatology

Volumn 144, Issue 6, 2008, Pages 749-755

  Warshaw, Erin M ^a,o   Furda, Laura M ⁱ   Maibach, Howard I ^b   Rietschel, Robert L ^k   Fowler Jr , Joseph F ^m   Belsito, Donald V ^c   Zug, Kathryn A ^l   DeLeo, Vincent A ^d   Marks Jr , James G ^e   Mathias, C G Toby ^j   Pratt, Melanie D ^g   Sasseville, Denis ⁿ   Storrs, Frances J ^h   Taylor, James S ^f  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI ST LOUIS   (United States)

^d Och Spine at New York Presbyterian Hospitals   (United States)

^e PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^f LERNER RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (United States)

^g UNIVERSITY OF OTTAWA   (Canada)

^h OREGON HEALTH AND SCIENCE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

ⁱ UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United States)

^j UNIVERSITY OF CINCINNATI   (United States)

^k UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA   (United States)

^l DARTMOUTH HITCHCOCK MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^m University of Louisville School of Medicine   (United States)

ⁿ MCGILL UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

^o VETERANS AFFAIRS MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

more..

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ALLERGEN; BENZOCAINE; BUDESONIDE; CINCHOCAINE; CINNAMALDEHYDE; COBALT CHLORIDE; CORTICOSTEROID DERIVATIVE; COSMETIC; DISULFIRAM; HYDROCORTISONE BUTYRATE; PHENYLENEDIAMINE; QUATERNIUM 15;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; ANOGENITAL DERMATITIS; ARTICLE; CHILD; CLINICAL FEATURE; CONTACT DERMATITIS; CONTROLLED STUDY; CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDY; DATA BASE; DERMATITIS; FEMALE; HUMAN; INFANT; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; NORTH AMERICA; PATCH TEST; PATIENT REFERRAL; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; SEX DIFFERENCE; SKIN ALLERGY;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; ANUS DISEASES; CHILD; CHILD, PRESCHOOL; CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDIES; DERMATITIS; DIAGNOSIS, DIFFERENTIAL; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; GENITAL DISEASES, FEMALE; GENITAL DISEASES, MALE; HUMANS; INFANT; INFANT, NEWBORN; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MORBIDITY; NORTH AMERICA; PATCH TESTS; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; RISK FACTORS;

EID: 45349104943     PISSN: 0003987X     EISSN: 0003987X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1001/archderm.144.6.749     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Arnold LD, Bachmann GA, Rosen R, Kelly S, Rhoads GG. Vulvodynia: characteristics and association with co-morbidities and quality of life. Obstet Gynecol. 2006;107(3):617-624.
2. Ponte M, Klemperer E, Sahay A, Chren M. Quality of life of 19 women with vulvodnia [abstract]. J Invest Dermatol. 2007;127(suppl 1):S63.
3. Margesson LJ. Contact dermatitis of the vulva. Dermatol Ther. 2004;17(1):20-27.
4. Crone AM, Stewart EJ, Wojnarowska F, Powell SM. Aetiological factors in vulvar dermatitis. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2000;14(3):181-186.
5. Nardelli A, Degreef H, Goossens A. Contact allergic reactions of the vulva: a 14-year review. Dermatitis. 2004;15(3):131-136.
6. Zeller S, Warshaw E. Allergic contact dermatitis. Minn Med. 2004;87(3):38-42.
7. Marks JG, Belsito DV, DeLeo VA, et al. North American Contact Dermatitis Group standard tray patch tests results (1992-1994). Am J Contact Dermat. 1995;6: 160-165.
8. Marks JG, Belsito DV, DeLeo VA, et al. North American Contact Dermatitis Group patch test results for the detection of delayed hypersensitivity to topical allergens. J Am Acad Dermatol. 1998;38(6 pt 1):911-918.
9. Warshaw EM, Rietschel RL, Sasseville D, et al. North American Contact Dermatitis Group patch test results 2003-2004 study period. Dermatitis. In press.
10. Bauer A, Geier J, Elsner P. Allergic contact dermatitis in patients with anogenital complaints. J Reprod Med. 2000;45(8):649-654.
11. Goldsmith PC, Rycroft RJG, White IR, Ridley CM, Neill SM, McFadden JP. Contact sensitivity in women with anogenital dermatoses. Contact Dermatitis. 1997; 36(3):174-175.
12. Marren P, Wojnarowska F, Powell S. Allergic contact dermatitis and vulvar dermatoses. Br J Dermatol. 1992;126(1):52-56.
13. Virgili A, Bacilieri S, Corazza M. Evaluation of contact sensitization in vulvar lichen simplex chronicus: a proposal for a battery of selected allergens. J Reprod Med. 2003;48(1):33-36.
14. Lucke TW, Fleming CJ, McHenry P, Lever R. Patch testing in vulval dermatoses: how relevant is nickel? Contact Dermatitis. 1998;38(2):111-112.
15. Brenan JA, Dennerstein GJ, Sfameni SF, Drinkwater P, Marin G, Scurry JP. Evaluation of patch testing in patients with chronic vulvar symptoms. Australas J Dermatol. 1996;37(1):40-43.
16. Pratt MD, Belsito DV, DeLeo VA, et al. North American Contact Dermatitis Group patch-test results, 2001-2002 study period [published correction appears in Dermatitis. 2005;16(2):106]. Dermatitis. 2004;15(4):176-183.
17. Marks JG Jr, Belsito DV, DeLeo VA, et al; North American Contact Dermatitis Group. North American Contact Dermatitis Group patch-test results, 1998-2000. Am J Contact Dermat. 2003;14(2):59-62.
18. Farage MA. Vulvar susceptibility to contact irritants and allergens: a review. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2005;272(2):167-172.
19. Farage M, Maibach HI. The vulvar epithelium differs from the skin: implications for cutaneous testing to address topical vulvar exposures. Contact Dermatitis. 2004;51(4):201-209.
20. Patton DL, Thwin SS, Meier A, Hooton TM, Stapleton AE, Eschenbach DA. Epithelial cell layer thickness and immune cell populations in the normal human vagina at different stages of the menstrual cycle. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2000; 183(4):967-973.
21. Edwards JN, Morris HB. Langerhans' cells and lymphocyte subsets in the female anogenital tract. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1985;92(9):974-982.
22. Goldman BD. Common dermatoses of the male genitalia: recognition of differences in genital rashes and lesions is essential and attainable. Postgrad Med. 2000;108(4):89-91, 95-96.
23. Foti C, Bonamonte D, Antelmi A, Conserva A, Angelini G. Allergic contact dermatitis to condoms: description of a clinical case and analytical review of current literature. Immunopharmacol Immunotoxicol. 2004;26(3):481-485.
24. Mallon E, Hawkins D, Dinneen M, et al. Circumcision and anogenital dermatoses. Arch Dermatol. 2000;136(3):350-354.
25. Tanaka S, Matsumoto Y, Dlova N, et al. Immediate contact reactions to fragrance mix constituents and Myroxylon pereirae resin. Contact Dermatitis. 2004;51(1):20-21.
26. Häusermann P, Harr T, Bircher AJ. Baboon syndrome resulting from systemic drugs: is there strife between SDRIFE and allergic contact dermatitis syndrome? Contact Dermatitis. 2004;51(5-6):297-310.
27. Salam TN, Fowler JF Jr. Balsam-related systemic contact dermatitis. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2001;45(3):377-381.
28. Fisher AA. Condom dermatitis in either partner. Cutis. 1987;39(4):281-284-285.
29. Salim A, Powell S, Wojnarowska F. Allergic contact dermatitis of the vulva: an overlooked diagnosis [case report]. J Obstet Gynaecol. 2002;22(4):447.
30. Warshaw EM, Schram SE, Rietschel RL, et al. Patch test reactions to topical anesthetics: retrospective analysis of cross-sectional data from the North American Contact Dermatitis Group 2001-2004. Dermatitis. In press.
31. Rietschel RT, Fowler JF, eds. Regional contact dermatitis. Fisher's Contact Dermatitis. 5th ed. Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins; 2001:60-63.
32. Farage MA, Bjerke DL, Mahony C, Blackburn KL, Gerberick GF. Quantitative risk assessment for the induction of allergic contact dermatitis: uncertainty factors for mucosal exposures. Contact Dermatitis. 2003;49(3):140-147.
33. Moss GP, Dearden JC, Patel H, Cronin MT. Quantitative structure-permeability relationships (QSPRs) for percutaneous absorption. Toxicol In Vitro. 2002; 16(3):299-317.
34. 14C cortisol in man. J Invest Dermatol. 1967;48(2):181-183.
35. Britz MB, Maibach HI, Anjo DM. Human percutaneous penetration of hydrocortisone: the vulva. Arch Dermatol Res. 1980;267(3):313-316.