DisCoVisc versus the soft-shell technique using Viscoat and Provisc in phacoemulsification: Randomized clinical trial

Journal of Cataract and Refractive Surgery

Volumn 34, Issue 7, 2008, Pages 1145-1151

  Praveen, Mamidipudi R ^a   Koul, Archana ^a   Vasavada, Abhay R ^a   Pandita, Deepak ^a   Dixit, Nirmit V ^a   Dahodwala, Farida F ^a  

^a ILADEVI CATARACT AND IOL RESEARCH CENTRE   (India)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CHONDROITIN SULFATE; HYALURONIC ACID;

ADULT; ANTERIOR EYE SEGMENT; ARTICLE; CELL DENSITY; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORNEA THICKNESS; ENDOTHELIUM CELL; FEMALE; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; PHACOEMULSIFICATION; POSTOPERATIVE CARE; POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD; PREOPERATIVE PERIOD; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; SURGEON;

CELL COUNT; CHONDROITIN; CORNEA; DOUBLE-BLIND METHOD; DRUG COMBINATIONS; ENDOTHELIUM, CORNEAL; FEMALE; HUMANS; HYALURONIC ACID; LENS IMPLANTATION, INTRAOCULAR; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PHACOEMULSIFICATION; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 45349097931     PISSN: 08863350     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2008.03.019     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Behndig A., and Lundberg B. Transient corneal edema after phacoemulsification: comparison of 3 viscoelastic regimens. J Cataract Refract Surg 28 (2002) 1551-1556
2. Hayashi K., Hayashi H., Nakao F., and Hayashi F. Risk factors for corneal endothelial injury during phacoemulsification. J Cataract Refract Surg 22 (1996) 1079-1084
3. Sugar J., Mitchelson J., and Kraff M. The effect of phacoemulsification on corneal endothelial cell density. Arch Ophthalmol 96 (1978) 446-448
4. Binder P.S., Sternberg H., Wickman M.G., and Worthen D.M. Corneal endothelial damage associated with phacoemulsification. Am J Ophthalmol 82 (1976) 48-54
5. Polack F.M., and Sugar A. The phacoemulsification procedure. II. Corneal endothelial changes. Invest Ophthalmol 15 (1976) 458-469. http://www.iovs.org/cgi/reprint/15/6/458.pdf Accessed April 4, 2008
6. Olson L.E., Marshall J., Rice N.S.C., and Andrews R. Effects of ultrasound on the corneal endothelium: I. The acute lesion. Br J Ophthalmol 62 (1978) 134-144
7. Edelhauser H.F., Van Horn D.L., Hyndiuk R.A., and Schultz R.O. Intraocular irrigating solutions; their effect on the corneal endothelium. Arch Ophthalmol 93 (1975) 648-657
8. Bourne W.M., and Kaufman H.E. Endothelial damage associated with intraocular lenses. Am J Ophthalmol 81 (1976) 482-485
9. Kaufman H.E., and Katz J.I. Endothelial damage from intraocular lens insertion. Invest Ophthalmol 15 (1976) 996-1000. http://www.iovs.org/cgi/reprint/15/12/996 Accessed April 4, 2008
10. Sugar J., Mitchelson J., and Kraff M. Endothelial trauma and cell loss from intraocular lens insertion. Arch Ophthalmol 96 (1978) 449-450
11. Craig M.T., Olson R.J., Mamalis N., and Olson R.J. Air bubble endothelial damage during phacoemulsification in human eye bank eyes: the protective effects of Healon and Viscoat. J Cataract Refract Surg 16 (1990) 597-602
12. Beesley R.D., Olson R.J., and Brady S.E. The effects of prolonged phacoemulsification time on the corneal endothelium. Ann Ophthalmol 18 (1986) 216-219 222
13. McCarey B.E., Polack F.M., and Marshall W. The phacoemulsification procedure. I. The effect of intraocular irrigating solutions on the corneal endothelium. Invest Ophthalmol 15 (1976) 449-457. http://www.iovs.org/cgi/reprint/15/6/449 Accessed April 4, 2008
14. Rainer G., Menapace R., Findl O., Georgopoulos M., Kiss B., and Petternel V. Intraocular pressure after small incision cataract surgery with Healon5 and Viscoat. J Cataract Refract Surg 26 (2000) 271-276
15. Arshinoff S.A., and Jafari M. New classification of ophthalmic viscosurgical devices-2005. J Cataract Refract Surg 31 (2005) 2167-2171
16. Arshinoff S.A. Dispersive and cohesive viscoelastic materials in phacoemulsification. Ophthalmic Pract 13 (1995) 98-104
17. Miyata K., Maruoka S., Nakahara M., Otani S., Nejima R., Samejima T., and Amano S. Corneal endothelial cell protection during phacoemulsification; low- versus high-molecular-weight sodium hyaluronate. J Cataract Refract Surg 28 (2002) 1557-1560
18. Arshinoff S.A. Dispersive-cohesive viscoelastic soft shell technique. J Cataract Refract Surg 25 (1999) 167-173
19. Bissen-Miyajima H. In vitro behavior of ophthalmic viscosurgical devices during phacoemulsification. J Cataract Refract Surg 32 (2006) 1026-1031
20. Emery J.M. Kelman phacoemulsification; patient selection. In: Emery J.M., and McIntyre D.J. (Eds). Extracapsular Cataract Surgery (1983), CV Mosby, St Louis, MO 95-100
21. Hogan M.J., Kimura S.J., and Thygeson P. Signs and symptoms of uveitis. 1. Anterior uveitis. Am J Ophthalmol 47 5, pt 2 (1959) 155-170
22. Vasavada A.R., and Singh R. Step-by-step chop in situ and separation of very dense cataracts. J Cataract Refract Surg 24 (1998) 156-159
23. Vasavada A.R., and Raj S. Step-down technique. J Cataract Refract Surg 29 (2003) 1077-1079
24. Kiss B., Findl O., Menapace R., Petternel V., Wirtitsch M., Lorang T., Gengler M., and Drexler W. Corneal endothelial cell protection with a dispersive viscoelastic material and an irrigating solution during phacoemulsification; low-cost versus expensive combination. J Cataract Refract Surg 29 (2003) 733-740
25. Mencucci R., Ponchietti C., Virgili G., Giansanti F., and Menchini U. Corneal endothelial damage after cataract surgery: microincision versus standard technique. J Cataract Refract Surg 32 (2006) 1351-1354
26. Vasavada V., Vasavada V., Raj S.M., and Vasavada A.R. Intraoperative performance and pstoperative outcomes of microcoaxial phacoemulsification; observational study. J Cataract Refract Surg 33 (2007) 1019-1024
27. Bourne R.R., Minassian D.C., Dart J.K.G., Rosen P., Kaushal S., and Wingate N. Effect of cataract surgery on the corneal endothelium; modern phacoemulsification compared with extracapsular cataract surgery. Ophthalmology 111 (2004) 679-685
28. Colvard D.M., Kratz R.P., Mazzocco T.R., and Davidson B. Endothelial cell loss following phacoemulsification in the pupillary plane. Am Intra-Ocular Implant Soc J 7 (1981) 334-336
29. Sugar J., Mitchelson J., and Kraff M. The effect of phacoemulsification on corneal endothelial cell density. Arch Ophthalmol 96 (1978) 446-448
30. Zetterström C., and Laurell C.-G. Comparison of endothelial cell loss and phacoemulsification energy during endocapsular phacoemulsification surgery. J Cataract Refract Surg 21 (1995) 55-58
31. Miyata K., Nagamoto T., Maruoka S., Tanabe T., Nakahara M., and Amano S. Efficacy and safety of the soft-shell technique in cases with a hard lens nucleus. J Cataract Refract Surg 28 (2002) 1546-1550
32. Maár N., Graebe A., Schild G., Stur M., and Amon M. Influence of viscoelastic substances used in cataract surgery on corneal metabolism and endothelial morphology: comparison of Healon and Viscoat. J Cataract Refract Surg 27 (2001) 1756-1761
33. Liesegang T.J. Viscoelastic substances in ophthalmology. Surv Ophthalmol 34 (1990) 268-293
34. Glasser D.B., Katz H.R., Boyd J.E., Langdon J.D., Shobe S.L., and Peiffer R.L. Protective effects of viscous solutions in phacoemulsification and traumatic lens implantation. Arch Ophthalmol 107 (1989) 1047-1051
35. Probst L.E., Hakim O.J., and Nichols B.D. Phacoemulsification with aspirated or retained Viscoat. J Cataract Refract Surg 20 (1994) 145-149
36. Koch D.D., Liu J.F., Glasser D.B., Merin L.M., and Haft E. A comparison of corneal endothelial changes after use of Healon or Viscoat during phacoemulsification. Am J Ophthalmol 115 (1993) 188-201
37. ® in phacoemulsification.]. Arch Soc Esp Oftalmol 82 (2007) 489-494. Available at: http://scielo.isciii.es/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0365-66912007000800007&lng=en&nrm=iso Accessed April 4, 2008