When authorship isn't enough: Lessons from CERN on the implications of formal and informal credit attribution mechanisms in collaborative research

Journal of Electronic Publishing

Volumn 11, Issue 1, 2008, Pages

  Birnholtz, Jeremy ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 45349093528     PISSN: None     EISSN: 10802711     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3998/3336451.0011.105     Document Type: Review

References (38)

1. Atkins, D. E., Droegemeier, K. K., Feldman, S. I., Garcia-Molina, H., Klein, M. L., & Messina, P. (2003). Revolutionizing science and engineering through cyberinfrastructure: Report of the national science foundation blue-ribbon advisory panel on cyberinfrastructure. Washington, DC: National Science Foundation.
2. Biagioli, M. (2003). Rights or rewards. In M. Biagioli & P. Galison (Eds.), Scientific authorship: Credit and intellectual property in science (pp. 253-280). New York: Routledge.
3. Birnholtz, J. P. (2005). When do researchers collaborate? Toward a model of collaboration propensity in science and engineering research. Doctoral dissertation, School of Information, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI.
4. Birnholtz, J. P. (2006). What does it mean to be an author? The intersection of credit, contribution and collaboration in science. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 57(13), 1758-1770.
5. Bourdieu, P. (1984). Distinction: A social critique of the judgement of taste. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
6. Claxton, L. D. (2005). Scientific authorship: Part 2. History, recurring issues, practices and guidelines. Mutation Research, 589(1), 31-45.
7. Close, F., Marten, M., & Sutton, C. (2002). The particle odyssey: A journey to the heart of matter. New York: Oxford University Press.
8. Cronin, B. (1995). The scholar's courtesy: The role of acknowledgement in the primary communication process. London: Taylor Graham.
9. Cronin, B. (2001). Hyperauthorship: A postmodern perversion or evidence of a structural shift in scholarly communication practices? Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 52(7), 558-569.
10. DeSanctis, G., & Monge, P. (1998). Communication processes for virtual organizations. Journal of Computer Mediated Communication, 3(4).
11. Finholt, T. A. (2003). Collaboratories as a new form of scientific organization. Economics of Innovation and New Technologies, 12(1), 5-25.
12. Finholt, T. A., & Olson, G. M. (1997). From laboratories to collaboratories: A new organizational form for scientific collaboration. Psychological Science, 8(1), 28-36.
13. Foster, I., & Kesselman, C. (1999). The grid: Blueprint for a new computing infrastructure. San Francisco: Morgan Kaufmann.
14. Franck, G. (1999). Scientific communication - a vanity fair? Science, 286(5437), 53-55.
15. Galison, P. (1997). Image and logic: A material culture of microphysics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
16. Galison, P., & Hevly, B. (1992). Big science: The growth of large-scale research. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
17. Huberman, A. M., & Miles, M. B. (1994). Data management and analysis methods. In Lincoln & Denzin (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
18. Kane, G. L. (1987). Modern elementary particle physics. New York: Perseus Books.
19. Kanefsky, B., Barlow, N.G., Gulick, V.C. (2001). Can distributed volunteers accomplish a massive data analysis task? Proceedings of Planetary Science XXXII, 1272.
20. Kennedy, D. (2003). Multiple authors, multiple problems. Science, 301, 733.
21. Kevles, D. J. (1998). The Baltimore case: A trial of politics, science, and character. New York: Norton.
22. Kling, R., & McKim, G. (2000). Not just a matter of time: Field differences and the shaping of electronic media in supporting scientific communication. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 51(14), 1306-1320.
23. Knorr Cetina, K. (1999). Epistemic cultures: How the sciences make knowledge. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
24. Kouzes, R. T., Myers, J. D., & Wulf, W. A. (1996). Collaboratories: Doing science on the internet. IEEE Computer, 29(8), 40-46.
25. National Research Councils. (1993). National collaboratories: Applying information technology to scientific research. Washington, DC.
26. Nentwich, M. (2003). Cyberscience: Research in the age of the internet. Vienna: Austrian Academy of Sciences.
27. Newell, A., & Sproull, R. F. (1982). Computer networks: Prospects for scientists. Science, 215(4534), 843-852.
28. Paneth, N., Hemenway, D., Fortney, J. A., & Jung, B. C. (1998). Authorship: Readers and editors respond. American Journal of Public Health, 88(5), 824-831.
29. Parker, R. A., & Berman, N. A. (1998). Criteria for authorship for statisticians in medical papers. Statistics in Medicine, 17(20), 2289-2299.
30. Rennie, D., Yank, V., & Emanuel, L. (1997). When authorship fails: A proposal to make contributors accountable. Journal of the American Medical Association, 278(7), 579-585.
31. Rose, M. (1993). Authors and owners: The invention of copyright. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
32. Seife, C. (2005). High-energy physics: Exit America? Science, 308(5718), 38-40.
33. Shapin, S. (1989). The invisible technician. American Scientist, 77, 554-563.
34. Tarnow, E. (1999). The authorship list in science: Junior physicists' perceptions of who appears and why. Science and Engineering Ethics, 5(1), 73-88.
35. Taubes, G. (1986). Nobel dreams: Power, deceit and the ultimate experiment. New York: Random House.
36. Traweek, S. (1988). Beamtimes and lifetimes: The world of high energy physicists. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
37. Whitley, R. (2000). The intellectual and social organization of the sciences. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
38. Woodmansee, M., & Jaszi, P. (1994). The construction of authorship: Textual appropriation in law and literature. London: Duke University Press.