'True' and 'untrue' individual recognition: suggestion of a less restrictive definition

Trends in Ecology and Evolution

Volumn 23, Issue 7, 2008, Pages 355-

  Steiger, Sandra ^a   Müller, Josef K ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF FREIBURG   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL; BREEDING; ECOLOGY; EVOLUTION; FAMILY; FEMALE; GENDER IDENTITY; HUMAN; INDIVIDUALITY; LETTER; MALE; MATE CHOICE; PHYSIOLOGY; RECOGNITION; SEXUAL DEVELOPMENT;

ANIMALS; BREEDING; ECOLOGY; EVOLUTION; FAMILY; FEMALE; GENDER IDENTITY; HUMANS; INDIVIDUALITY; MALE; MATING PREFERENCE, ANIMAL; RECOGNITION (PSYCHOLOGY); SEX CHARACTERISTICS;

EID: 45349083104     PISSN: 01695347     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.tree.2008.01.014     Document Type: Letter

References (6)

1. Tibbetts E.A., and Dale J. Individual recognition: it is good to be different. Trends Ecol. Evol. 22 (2007) 529-537
2. Beecher M.D. Signaling systems for individual recognition - an information theory approach. Anim. Behav. 38 (1989) 248-261
3. Barrows E.M., et al. Individual odor differences and their social functions in insects. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 72 (1975) 2824-2828
4. Tibbetts E.A. Visual signals of individual identity in the wasp Polistes fuscatus. Proc. Biol. Sci. 269 (2002) 1423-1428
5. D'Ettorre P., and Heinze J. Individual recognition in ant queens. Curr. Biol. 15 (2005) 2170-2174
6. Sherman P.W., et al. Recognition systems. In: Krebs J.R., and Davies N.B. (Eds). Behavioural Ecology: An Evolutionary Approach. 4th edn (1997), Blackwell Science 69-96