Bures distance as a measure of entanglement for symmetric two-mode Gaussian states

Physical Review A - Atomic, Molecular, and Optical Physics

Volumn 77, Issue 6, 2008, Pages

  Marian, Paulina ^a   Marian, Tudor A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BUCHAREST   (Romania)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COVARIANCE MATRIX; EIGENVALUES AND EIGENFUNCTIONS; ELECTROMAGNETIC FIELDS; GAUSSIAN DISTRIBUTION;

DEGREE OF ENTANGLEMENT; DENSITY OPERATORS; GAUSSIAN ENTANGLEMENT; GAUSSIAN STATE; MINIMIZATION PROCEDURES; QUANTUM ELECTROMAGNETIC FIELDS; SYMMETRIC STATE; TWO-MODE GAUSSIAN STATE;

QUANTUM ENTANGLEMENT;

EID: 45249116973     PISSN: 10502947     EISSN: 10941622     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevA.77.062319     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. S. L. Braunstein and P. Van Loock, Rev. Mod. Phys. RMPHAT 0034-6861 10.1103/RevModPhys.77.513 77, 513 (2005).
2. X. Wang, T. Hiroshima, A. Tomita, and M. Hayashi, Phys. Rep. PRPLCM 0370-1573 10.1016/j.physrep.2007.04.005 448, 1 (2007).
3. L.-M. Duan, G. Giedke, J. I. Cirac, and P. Zoller, Phys. Rev. Lett. PRLTAO 0031-9007 10.1103/PhysRevLett.84.2722 84, 2722 (2000).
4. R. Simon, Phys. Rev. Lett. PRLTAO 0031-9007 10.1103/PhysRevLett.84.2726 84, 2726 (2000).
5. A. Peres, Phys. Rev. Lett. PRLTAO 0031-9007 10.1103/PhysRevLett.77.1413 77, 1413 (1996).
6. P. Marian, T. A. Marian, and H. Scutaru, J. Phys. A JPHAC5 0305-4470 10.1088/0305-4470/34/35/322 34, 6969 (2001).
7. J. Lee, M. S. Kim, Y. J. Park, and S. Lee, J. Mod. Opt. JMOPEW 0950-0340 10.1080/095003400420012 47, 2151 (2000).
8. G. Vidal and R. F. Werner, Phys. Rev. A PLRAAN 1050-2947 10.1103/PhysRevA.65.032314 65, 032314 (2002).
9. G. Giedke, M. M. Wolf, O. Krüger, R. F. Werner, and J. I. Cirac, Phys. Rev. Lett. PRLTAO 0031-9007 10.1103/PhysRevLett.91.107901 91, 107901 (2003).
10. M. M. Wolf, G. Giedke, O. Krüger, R. F. Werner, and J. I. Cirac, Phys. Rev. A PLRAAN 1050-2947 10.1103/PhysRevA.69.052320 69, 052320 (2004).
11. L.-Z. Jiang, Int. J. Quantum Inf. ZZZZZZ 0219-7499 2, 273 (2004).
12. G. Adesso, A. Serafini, and F. Illuminati, Phys. Rev. Lett. PRLTAO 0031-9007 10.1103/PhysRevLett.92.087901 92, 087901 (2004)
13. G. Adesso, A. Serafini, and F. Illuminati, Phys. Rev. A PLRAAN 1050-2947 10.1103/PhysRevA.70.022318 70, 022318 (2004).
14. G. Adesso and F. Illuminati, Phys. Rev. A PLRAAN 1050-2947 10.1103/PhysRevA.72.032334 72, 032334 (2005).
15. V. Vedral, M. B. Plenio, M. A. Rippin, and P. L. Knight, Phys. Rev. Lett. PRLTAO 0031-9007 10.1103/PhysRevLett.78.2275 78, 2275 (1997)
16. V. Vedral and M. B. Plenio, Phys. Rev. A PLRAAN 1050-2947 10.1103/PhysRevA.57.1619 57, 1619 (1998)
17. V. Vedral, Rev. Mod. Phys. RMPHAT 0034-6861 10.1103/RevModPhys.74.197 74, 197 (2002).
18. S. Scheel and D.-G. Welsch, Phys. Rev. A PLRAAN 1050-2947 10.1103/PhysRevA.64.063811 64, 063811 (2001).
19. P. Marian, T. A. Marian, and H. Scutaru, Phys. Rev. A PLRAAN 1050-2947 10.1103/PhysRevA.68.062309 68, 062309 (2003).
20. These two Gaussian measures of entanglement for a STS are interestingly depending on the difference between the two-mode squeeze parameter r and its value rs defining the separability threshold.
21. P. Marian, Phys. Rev. A PLRAAN 1050-2947 10.1103/PhysRevA.45.2044 45, 2044 (1992)
22. P. Marian and T. A. Marian, Phys. Rev. A PLRAAN 1050-2947 10.1103/PhysRevA.47.4474 47, 4474 (1993)
23. P. Marian and T. A. Marian, Phys. Rev. A PLRAAN 1050-2947 10.1103/PhysRevA.47.4487 47, 4487 (1993).
24. Generally, the classicality condition (existence of a well-behaved P representation) is stronger than the separability one. See Ref. for a more detailed analysis on this issue.
25. B. L. Schumaker, Phys. Rep. PRPLCM 0370-1573 10.1016/0370-1573(86)90179-1 135, 317 (1986).
26. U. Leonhardt, Phys. Rev. A PLRAAN 1050-2947 10.1103/PhysRevA.48.3265 48, 3265 (1993).
27. D. Bures, Trans. Am. Math. Soc. TAMTAM 0002-9947 10.2307/1995012 135, 199 (1969).
28. A. Uhlmann, Rep. Math. Phys. RMHPBE 0034-4877 10.1016/0034-4877(76)90060- 4 9, 273 (1976)
29. A. Uhlmann, Rep. Math. Phys. RMHPBE 0034-4877 10.1016/0034-4877(86)90055- 8 24, 229 (1986).
30. R. Jozsa, J. Mod. Opt. JMOPEW 0950-0340 10.1080/09500349414552171 41, 2315 (1994).
31. C. A. Fuchs, Ph.D. thesis, University of New Mexico, 1995, e-print arXiv:quant-ph/9601020.
32. J. Twamley, J. Phys. A JPHAC5 0305-4470 10.1088/0305-4470/29/13/036 29, 3723 (1996)
33. Gh.-S. Proanu and H. Scutaru, Phys. Rev. A PLRAAN 1050-2947 10.1103/PhysRevA.58.869 58, 869 (1998)
34. H. Scutaru, J. Phys. A JPHAC5 0305-4470 10.1088/0305-4470/31/15/025 31, 3659 (1998).
35. P. Marian, T. A. Marian, and H. Scutaru, Phys. Rev. Lett. PRLTAO 0031-9007 10.1103/PhysRevLett.88.153601 88, 153601 (2002)
36. P. Marian, T. A. Marian, and H. Scutaru, Phys. Rev. A PLRAAN 1050-2947 10.1103/PhysRevA.69.022104 69, 022104 (2004).
37. P. Marian, T. A. Marian, and H. Scutaru, Rom. J. Phys. RJPHEC 1221-146X 48, 727 (2003).
38. M. Ban, Phys. Rev. A PLRAAN 1050-2947 10.1103/PhysRevA.69.054304 69, 054304 (2004).
39. P. Marian and T. A. Marian (in preparation).
40. M. C. de Oliveira, Phys. Rev. A PLRAAN 1050-2947 10.1103/PhysRevA.72. 012317 72, 012317 (2005). The possibility of using the diagonalization of the CM of a symmetric TMGS to evaluate its Gaussian entanglement was first pointed out by de Oliveira in this paper.
41. The new variables x and y of maximization are in fact the squared symplectic eigenvalues of the symmetric separable state ρ′.