A hybrid zone defined by allozymes and ventral colour in Geocrinia rosea (Anura:Myobatrachidae)

Australian Journal of Zoology

Volumn 55, Issue 6, 2007, Pages 371-376

  Driscoll, Don A ^a,b   Roberts, J Dale ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WESTERN AUSTRALIA   (Australia)

^b AUSTRALIAN NATIONAL UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ALLOPATRY; ALLOZYME; COLOR MORPH; DIVERGENCE; FROG; HYBRID ZONE; SPATIAL DISTRIBUTION;

ANURA; GEOCRINIA ROSEA; MYOBATRACHIDAE;

EID: 45249106342     PISSN: 0004959X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1071/ZO08020     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Babik, W., Szymura, J. M., and Rafinski, J. (2003). Nuclear markers, mitochondrial DNA and male secondary sexual traits variation in a newt hybrid zone (Triturus vulgaris x T. montandoni). Molecular Ecology 12, 1913-1930. doi:10.1046/j.1365-294X.2003.01880.x
2. Barton, N. H., and Hewitt, G. M. (1985). Analysis of hybrid zones. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 16, 113-148. doi:10.1146/annurev.es.16.110185.000553
3. Barton, N. H., and Hewitt, G. M. (1989). Adaptation, speciation and hybrid zones. Nature 341, 497-503. doi:10.1038/341497a0
4. Cracraft, J. (1983). Species concepts and speciation analysis. In 'Current Ornithology'. (Ed. R. F. Johnston.) pp. 159-187. (Plenum Press: New York.)
5. Driscoll, D. A. (1998a). Counts of calling males as estimates of population size in the endangered frogs Geocrinia alba and G. vitellina. Journal of Herpetology 32, 475-481. doi:10.2307/1565200
6. Driscoll, D. A. (1998b). Genetic structure of the frogs Geocrinia lutea and Geocrinia rosea reflects extreme population divergence and range changes, not dispersal barriers. Evolution 52, 1147-1157. doi:10.2307/2411244
7. Driscoll, D. A. (1998c). Genetic structure, metapopulation processes and evolution influence the conservation strategies for two endangered frog species. Biological Conservation 83, 43-54. doi:10.1016/S0006-3207(97)00045-1
8. Driscoll, D. A. (1999). Genetic neighbourhood and effective population size for two endangered frogs. Biological Conservation 88, 221-229. doi:10.1016/S0006-3207(98)00099-8
9. Driscoll, D. A. (2007). The conservation challenge of sustaining spatially dependent evolution. Pacific Conservation Biology 13, 84-92.
10. Dynesius, M., and Jansson, R. (2000). Evolutionary consequences of changes in species' geographical distributions driven by Milankovitch climate oscillations. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 97, 9115-9120. doi:10.1073/pnas. 97.16.9115
11. Gollmann, G. (1991). Population structure of Australian frogs (Geocrinia laevis complex) in a hybrid zone. Copeia, 593-602. doi:10.2307/1446387
12. Gollmann, B., and Gollmann, G. (1994). Life-history variation across a hybrid zone in Geocrinia embryonic-development and larval growth (Amphibia, Anura, Myobatrachinae). Acta Oecologica - International Journal of Ecology 15, 247-259.
13. Gollmann, B., and Gollmann, G. (1996a). Geographic variation of larval traits in the Australian frog Geocrina victoriana. Herpetologica 52, 181-187.
14. Gollmann, G., and Gollmann, B. (1996b). Morphometric analysis of a hybrid zone in Geocrinia: larval versus adult character suites (Amphibia: Anura: Myobatrachinae). Israel Journal of Zoology 42, 159-169.
15. Hopper, S. D. (1979). Biogeographical aspects of speciation in the south-west Australian flora. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 10, 399-422. doi:10.1146/annurev.es.10.110179.002151
16. Littlejohn, M. J., and Watson, G. F. (1985). Hybrid zones and homogamy in Australian frogs. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 16, 85-112. doi:10.1146/annurev.es.16.110185.000505
17. Littlejohn, M. J., Watson, G. F., and Loftus-Hills, J. J. (1971). Contact hybridization in the Crinia laevis complex (Anura: Leptodactylidae). Australian Journal of Zoology 19, 85-100. doi:10.1071/ZO9710085
18. Mallet, J. (2007). Hybrid speciation. Nature 446, 279-283. doi:10.1038/nature05706
19. Nei, M. (1978). Estimation of average heterozygosity and genetic distance from a small number of individuals. Genetics 89, 583-590.
20. Nixon, K. C., and Wheeler, Q. D. (1990). An amplification of the phylogenetic species concept. Cladistics 6, 211-223.
21. Porter, H. A. (1990). Testing minimal species boundaries using gene flow statistics: the taxonomy of two hybridizing admiral butterflies (Limenitis: Nymphalidae). Systematic Zoology 39, 131-147. doi:10.2307/2992451
22. Read, K., Keogh, J. S., Scott, I. A. W., Roberts, J. D., and Doughty, P. (2001). Molecular phylogeny of the Australian frog genera Crinia, Geocrinia, and allied taxa (Anura: Myobatrachidae). Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 21, 294-308. doi:10.1006/mpev.2001.1014
23. Roberts, J. D., and Wardell-Johnson, G. (1995). Call differences between peripheral isolates of the Geocrinia rosea complex (Anura: Myobatrachidae) in south-western Australia. Copeia 1995, 899-906. doi:10.2307/1447038
24. Roberts, J. D., Wardell-Johnson, G., and Barendse, W. (1990). Extended descriptions of Geocrinia vitellina and Geocrinia alba (Anura: Myobatrachidae) from south-western Australia, with comments on the status of G. lutea. Records of the Western Australian Museum 14, 427-437.
25. Sadedin, S., and Littlejohn, M. J. (2003). A spatially explicit individual-based model of reinforcement in hybrid zones. Evolution 57, 962-970.
26. Scroggie, M. P., and Littlejohn, M. J. (2005). Territorial vocal behavior in hybrid smooth froglets, Geocrinia laevis complex (Anura: Myobatrachidae). Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 58, 72-79. doi:10.1007/ s00265-004-0894-2
27. Wardell-Johnson, G., and Roberts, J. D. (1993). Biogeographic barriers in a subdued landscape: the distribution of the Geocrinia rosea (Anura: Myobatrachidae) complex in south western Australia. Journal of Biogeography 20, 95-108. doi:10.2307/2845743
28. Zink, R. M., and McKitrick, M. C. (1995). The debate over species concepts and its implications for ornithology. The Auk 112, 701-719.