A computer-based aid for communication between patients with limited English and their clinicians, using symbols and digitised speech

International Journal of Medical Informatics

Volumn 77, Issue 8, 2008, Pages 507-517

  Somers, Harold L ^a   Caress, Ann Louise ^a   Evans, D Gareth ^a   Johnson, Marianne J ^a   Lovel, Hermione J ^a   Mohamed, Zeinab ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MANCHESTER   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Asthma; Patients with limited English; Practitioner patient communication; Primary care; Somalis

Indexed keywords

COMMUNICATION AIDS; COMPUTER-BASED APPROACH; FAMILY MEMBERS;

CODES (SYMBOLS); COMPUTER NETWORKS; COMPUTERS; HEALTH; LAPTOP COMPUTERS; LINGUISTICS; MEDICAL COMPUTING; PATIENT TREATMENT; SPEECH; SPEECH COMMUNICATION;

COMMUNICATION;

ARTICLE; COMMUNICATION AID; COMPUTER; ETHNIC AND RACIAL GROUPS; GENERAL PRACTITIONER; HUMAN; INTERPERSONAL COMMUNICATION; LANGUAGE; LANGUAGE BARRIER; NURSE; PRACTITIONER PATIENT COMMUNICATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUESTIONNAIRE; SATISFACTION; SOMALI; UNITED KINGDOM;

ADULT; AGED; ASTHMA; COMMUNICATION BARRIERS; ENGLAND; FEMALE; HUMANS; LANGUAGE; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PROFESSIONAL-PATIENT RELATIONS; QUESTIONNAIRES; SOFTWARE DESIGN; SOMALIA; USER-COMPUTER INTERFACE;

EID: 45149147287     PISSN: 13865056     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2007.10.007     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. Smaje C. Health, 'Race' and Ethnicity: Making Sense of the Evidence (1995), King's Fund Institute, London
2. Ong L.M.L., de Haes J.C.M.J., Hoos A.M., and Lammes F.B. Doctor-patient communication: a review. Soc. Sci. Med. 40 (1995) 903-918
3. Jones D., and Gill P. Breaking down language barriers. BMJ 316 (1998) 1476-1480
4. Free C. Breaking down language barriers: some ethnic groups may have problems in getting as far as a consultation. BMJ 317 (1998) 816-817
5. Bischoff A., Bovier P.A., Isah R., Francoise G., Ariel E., and Louis L. Language barriers between nurses and asylum seekers: their impact on symptom reporting and referral. Soc. Sci. Med. 57 (2003) 503-512
6. Karliner L.S., Perez-Stable E.J., and Gildengorin G. Language divide: the importance of training in the use of interpreters for out patient practice. J. Gen. Intern. Med. 19 (2004) 175-183
7. Robinson M., and Phillips P. An investigation into the perceptions of primary care practitioners of their education and development needs for communicating with patients who may not be fluent in English. Nurs. Educ. Today 23 (2003) 286-298
8. Gerrish K. The nature and effect of communication difficulties arising from interactions between district nurses and South Asian patients and their carers. J. Adv. Nurs. 35 (2001) 566-574
9. Johnson M.J., Evans D.G., Mohamed Z., and Caress A.L. The development and evaluation of alternative communication strategies to facilitate interactions with Somali refugees in primary care: a preliminary study. Inform. Prim. Care 14 (2006) 183-189
10. Somers H.L., and Lovel H. Computer-based support for patients with limited English. Proceedings of the 7th International EAMT Workshop on MT and other language technology tools. Budapest (2003) 41-49
11. Somers H., Lovel H., Johnson M., and Mohamed Z. Language technology for patients with limited English. EACH International Conference on Communication in Healthcare. Bruges, Belgium (2004) P04.09
12. Somers H. Language engineering and the pathway to healthcare: a user-oriented view. Proceedings HLT/NAACL-06 Workshop on Medical Speech Translation. New York (2006) 32-39
13. In: Cole R.A., Mariani J., Uszkoreit H., Varile G.B., Zaenen A., Zue V., and Zampolli A. (Eds). Survey of the State of the Art in Human Language Technology (1997), CUP/Giardini, Cambridge
14. Glennen S.L., and DeCoste D.C. Handbook of Augmentative and Alternative Communication (1997), Singular, London
15. Beukelman D.R., and Mirenda P. Augmentative and Alternative Communication: Management of Severe Communication Disorders in Children and Adults. second ed. (1998), Paul H Brookes, London
16. Newell A.F. Speech technology: cross-fertilization between research for the disabled and the non-disabled. Proceedings of the First ISAAC Research Symposium in Augmentative and Alternative Communication. Stockholm (1990)
17. Iwabuchi M., Alm N., Andreasen P., and Nakamura K. The development of UNICORN-a multi-lingual communicator for people with cross-language communication difficulties. CSUN 2000, 15th Technology and Persons with Disabilities Conference. Los Angeles (2000)
18. Somers H. Disabled by language? Problems of limited majority language skills in doctor-patient communication. IJCNLP-04 Satellite Symposium, Proceedings Asian Symposium on Natural Language Processing to Overcome Language Barriers. Hainan, China (2004) 104
19. Johnson M.J. What can we learn from drawing parallels between people who use AAC and people whose first language is not English?. Commun. Matters 18.2 (2004) 15-17
20. H.L. Somers, H.J. Lovel, Can AAC technology facilitate communication for patients with limited English? ESRC Project Final Report, School of Informatics, University of Manchester, 2007; available at http://www.informatics.manchester.ac.uk/∼harold/ESRCfinal.doc [last accessed 4 April 2007].
21. Lovel H.J., Mohamed Z., and Moran R. Needs assessment with a hard-to-reach group (the example of Somali refugees in Manchester). Workshop on Needs and Outcome Assessment (NOA) in Primary Health Care. Heraklion, Greece (1998)
22. British Guideline on the Management of Asthma: A National Clinical Guideline, British Thoracic Society/Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network, second ed., November 2005.
23. In: Oflazer K. (Ed). Language Engineering for Lesser-Studied Languages (2003), IOS Press/Ohmsha, Amsterdam
24. Musselwhite C.R., and Ruscello D.M. Transparency of three communication symbol systems. J. Speech Hear. Res. 27 (1984) 436-443
25. Mizuko M. Transparency and ease of learning of symbols represented by Blissymbols, PCS, and Picsyms. Augment. Altern. Commun. 3 (1987) 129-136
26. Mizuko M., and Reichle J. Transparency and recall of symbols among intellectually handicapped adults. J. Speech Hear. Disord. 54 (1989) 627-633
27. Bartholomew L.K., Gold R.S., Parcel G.S., Czyzewski D.I., Sockrider M.M., Fernandez M., Shegog R., and Swank P. Watch, discover, think, and act: evaluation of computer-assisted instruction to improve asthma self-management in inner city children. Pat. Educ. Counsel. 39 (2000) 269-280
28. Hahn E.A., Cella D., Dobrez D., Shiomoto G., Marcus E., Taylor S.G., Vohra M., Chang C.-H., Wright B.D., Linacre J.M., Weiss B.D., Valenzuela V., Chiang H.-L., and Webster K. The talking touchscreen: a new approach to outcomes assessment in low literacy. Psycho-Oncology 13 (2004) 86-95
29. Oppenheim A.N. Questionnaire Design, Interviewing and Attitude Measurement (1992), Continuum, London
30. Miles M., and Huberman A. Qualitative Data Analysis (1994), Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA
31. Flaskerud J.H. Is the Likert scale format culturally biased?. Nurs. Res. 37 (1988) 185-186
32. Heine S.J., Lehman D.R., Peng K., and Greenholz J. What's wrong with cross-cultural comparisons of subjective Likert scales? The reference group effect. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 82 (2002) 903-918
33. Johnson T., Kulesa P., Cho Y.I., and Shavitt S. The relation between culture and response styles: evidence from 19 countries. J. Cross Cult. Psychol. 36 (2005) 264-277
34. Lee J.W., Jones P.S., Mineyama Y., and Zhang X.E. Cultural differences in responses to a Likert scale. Res. Nurs. Health 25 (2002) 295-306
35. Mitchell E., and Sullivan F. A descriptive feast but an evaluative famine: systematic review of published articles on primary care computing during 1980-97. BMJ 322 (2001) 279-282
36. Hsu J., Huang J., Fung V., Robertson N., Jimison H., and Frankel R. Health information technology and physician-patient interactions: impact of computers on communication during outpatient primary care visits. J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc. 12 (2005) 474-480
37. Åkesson K.M., Saveman B.-I., and Nilsson G. Health care consumers' experiences of information communication technology-a summary of literature. Int. J. Med. Inform. 76 (2007) 633-645
38. Human Language Technology Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics HLT/NAACL-06 Workshop on Medical Speech Translation, New York, 2006.
39. Ettelaie E., Gandhe S., Georgiou P., Belvin R., Knight K., Marcu D., Narayanan S., and Traum D. Transonics: a practical speech-to-speech translator for English-Farsi medical dialogues. 43rd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, ACL-05 Interactive Poster and Demonstration Sessions. Ann Arbor, MI (2005) 89-92
40. Precoda K., Franco H., Dost A., Frandsen M., Fry J., Kathol A., Richey C., Riehemann S., Vergyri D., Zheng J., and Culy C. Limited-domain speech-to-speech translation between English and Pashto. HLT-NAACL 2004, Human Language Technology Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics, Demonstrations. Boston, MA (2004) 9-12
41. Narayanan S., Ananthakrishnan S., Belvin R., Ettelaie E., Gandhe S., Ganjavi S., Georgiou P.G., Hein C.M., Kadambe S., Knight K., Marcu D., Neely H.E., Srivasamurthy N., Traum D., and Wang D. The Transonics spoken dialogue translator: an aid for English-Persian doctor-patient interviews. In: Bickmore T. (Ed). Dialogue Systems for Health Communication, Papers from the 2004 Fall Symposium. Menlo Park, California (2004), American Association for Artificial Intelligence 97-103