The rise and impending decline of screening mammography

Radiology

Volumn 247, Issue 3, 2008, Pages 597-601

  Hall, Ferris M ^a  

^a BETH ISRAEL DEACONESS MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BREAST; BREAST CANCER; CANCER MORTALITY; CANCER RISK; CANCER SCREENING; COST EFFECTIVENESS ANALYSIS; DELAYED DIAGNOSIS; DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING; DIAGNOSTIC PROCEDURE; DIGITAL MAMMOGRAPHY; FOLLOW UP; HIGH RISK POPULATION; HUMAN; MAMMOGRAPHY; MEDICAL EDUCATION; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REVIEW; SCREENING; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; ARTICLE; BREAST TUMOR; ECONOMICS; FEMALE; MASS SCREENING; METHODOLOGY;

BREAST NEOPLASMS; FEMALE; HUMANS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MAMMOGRAPHY; MASS SCREENING; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

EID: 45149131658     PISSN: 00338419     EISSN: 15271315     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2473080148     Document Type: Review

References (24)

1. National Institutes of Health. NIH consensus development conference on breast cancer screening for women ages 40-49. In: Program and abstracts (online edition). NIH Consensus Development Conference, January 21-23 1997. Bethesda, Md: National Institutes of Health, 1997.
2. Kuhl CK. The current status of breast MR imaging. I. Choice of technique, image interpretation, diagnostic accuracy, and transfer to clinical practice. Radiology 2007;244:356-378.
3. Kuhl CK. The current status of breast MR imaging. II. Clinical applications. Radiology 2007;244:672-691.
4. Schneider BP, Miller KD. Angiogenesis of breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 2005;23:1782-1790.
5. Kumar AS, Chen DF, Au A, et al. Biologic significance of false-positive magnetic resonance imaging enhancement in the setting of ductal carcinoma in situ. Am J Surg 2006;192:520-524.
6. Kuhl CK. MRI for diagnosis of pure ductal carcinoma in situ: a prospective study. Lancet 2007;370:485-492.
7. Boetes C, Mann RM. Ductal carcinoma-insitu and breast MRI. Lancet 2007;370:459-460.
8. Saslow D, Boetes C, Burke W, et al. American Cancer Society guidelines for breast screening with MRI as an adjunct to mammography. CA Cancer J Clin 2007;57:75-89.
9. Smith RA. The evolving role of MRI in the detection and evaluation of breast cancer. N Engl J Med 2007;356:1362-1364.
10. Barlow WE, White E, Ballard-Barbash R, et al. Prospective breast cancer risk prediction model for women undergoing screening mammography. J Natl Cancer Inst 2006;98:1204-1214.
11. Chen J, Pee D, Ayyagari R, et al. Predicting absolute invasive breast cancer risk in white women with a model that includes mammographic density. J Natl Cancer Inst 2006;98:1215-1226.
12. Weitzel JN, Lagos VI, Cullinane CA, et al. Limited family structure and BRCA gene mutation status in single cases of breast cancer. JAMA 2007;297:2587-2595.
13. Boyd NF, Guo H, Martin LJ, et al. Mammographic density and the risk and detection of breast cancer. N Engl J Med 2007;356:227-236.
14. Kerlikowske K. The mammogram that cried wolf. N Engl J Med 2007;356:297-300.
15. Lehman CD. Role of MRI in screening woman at high risk for breast cancer. J Magn Reson Imaging 2006;24:964-970.
16. Lehman CD, Gastonis C, Kuhl CK, et al. MRI evaluation of the contralateral breast in women with recently diagnosed breast cancer. N Engl J Med 2007;356:1295-1303.
17. Frank HA, Hall FM, Steer ML. Preoperative localization of nonpalpable breast lesions demonstrated by mammography. N Engl J Med 1976;295:259-260.
18. Winawer S, Fletcher R, Rex D. Colorectal screening and surveillance: clinical guidelines and rationale - update based on new evidence. Gastroenterology 2003;124:544-560.
19. Iglehart JK. The new era of medical imaging: progress and pitfalls. N Engl J Med 2006;354:2822-2828.
20. Duffy SW, Tabár L, Vitak B, et al. The relative contributions of screening-detected in situ and invasive breast carcinoma in reducing mortality from the disease. Eur J Cancer 2003;39:1755-1760.
21. Burke W, Psaty BM. Personalized medicine in the era of genomics. JAMA 2007;298:1682-1684.
22. Hunter DJ, Khoury MJ, Drazen JM. Letting the genome out of the bottle: will we get our wish? N Engl J Med 2008;358:105-107.
23. Fenton JJ, Taplan SH, Carney PA. Influence of computer-aided detection on performance of screening mammography. N Engl J Med 2007;356:1399-1409.
24. Hall FM. Breast imaging and computer-aided detection. N Engl J Med 2007;356:1464-1466.