Comparison of strain doppler echocardiography and radiologic left ventriculography for quantitative assessment of regional myocardial function

International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging

Volumn 24, Issue 3, 2008, Pages 245-252

  Özer, Necla ^a   Kiliç, Harun ^b   Kepez, Alper ^c   Kaya, Ergün Bariş ^a   Deniz, Ali ^a   Atalar, Enver ^a   Aksöyek, Serdar ^a   Övünç, Kenan ^a   Özmen, Ferhan ^a   Kes, Sirri ^a  

^a HACETTEPE UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

^b DISKAPI YILDIRIM BEYAZIT TRAINING AND RESEARCH HOSPITAL   (Turkey)

^c NONE   (Turkey)

Author keywords

Left ventriculography; Myocardial strain imaging; Regional wall motion abnormalities

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ANGIOCARDIOGRAPHY; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORONARY ARTERY DISEASE; DOPPLER ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY; FEMALE; HEART FUNCTION; HEART MOVEMENT; HEART VENTRICULOGRAPHY; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MALE; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; STRAIN DOPPLER ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY; SYSTOLE; TREATMENT INDICATION; COMPARATIVE STUDY; ECHOGRAPHY; HEART CONTRACTION; HEART LEFT VENTRICLE FUNCTION; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; PHYSIOLOGY; RADIOGRAPHY; ROC CURVE;

CORONARY ANGIOGRAPHY; CORONARY DISEASE; ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY, DOPPLER; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MYOCARDIAL CONTRACTION; ROC CURVE; VENTRICULAR DYSFUNCTION, LEFT;

EID: 45149131263     PISSN: 15695794     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10554-007-9260-6     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Schiller NB, Shah PM, Crawford M et al (1989) Recommendations for quantification of the left ventricle by two-dimensional echocardiography: American Society of Echocardiography Committee on Standards, Subcommittee on Quantitation of Two-dimensional Echocardiograms. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 2:358-367
2. Visser CA, Kan G, Lie KI, Becker AE, Durrer D (1982) Apex two dimensional echocardiography: Alternative approach to quantification of acute myocardial infarction. Br Heart J 47:461-467
3. Sutherland GR, Di Salvo G, Claus P, D'hooge J, Bijnens B (2004) Strain and strain rate imaging: A new clinical approach to quantifying regional myocardial function. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 17:788-802
4. Kowalski M, Kukulski T, Jamal F, D'hooge J, Weidemann F, Rademakers F (2001) Can natural strain and strain rate quantify regional myocardial deformation? A study in healthy subjects. Ultrasound Med Biol 27:1087-1097
5. Pislaru C, Abraham TP, Belohlavek M (2002) Strain and strain rate echocardiography. Curr Opin Cardiol 17:443-454
6. Yip G, Abraham T, Belohlavek M, Khandheria BK (2003) Clinical applications of strain rate imaging. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 16:1334-1342
7. Edvardsen T, Gerber BL, Garot J, Bluemke DA, Lima JAC, Smiseth OA (2002) Quantitative assessment of intrinsic regional myocardial deformation by Doppler strain rate echocardiography in humans. Circulation 106:50-56
8. Urheim S, Edvardsen T, Torp H, Angelsen B, Smiseth OA (2000) Myocardial strain by Doppler echocardiography. Validation of a new method to quantify regional myocardial function. Circulation 102:1158-1164
9. Sasayama S, Nonogi H, Kawai C, Fujita M, Eiho S, Kuwahara M (1981) Automated method for left ventricular volume measurement by cineventriculography with minimal doses of contrast medium. Am J Cardiol 48:746-753
10. Sheehan FH, Bolson EL, Dodge HT, Mathey DG, Schofer J, Woo HW (1986) Advantages and applications of the centerline method for characterizing regional ventricular function. Circulation 74:293-305
11. Penicka M, Bartunek J, Wijns W, De Wolf I, Heyndrickx GR, De Raedt H et al (2004) Tissue Doppler imaging of left ventricular function after recanalization of an occluded coronary artery. J Am Coll Cardiol 43:85-91
12. D'hooge J, Heimdal A, Jamal F, Kukulski T, Bijnens B, Rademakers F et al (2000) Regional strain and strain rate measurement by cardiac ultrasound: Principles, implementation and limitations. Eur J Echocardiogr 1:154-170
13. Voigt JU, Arnold MF, Karlsson M, Hubbert L, Kukulski T, Hatle L et al (2000) Assessment of regional longitudinal myocardial strain rate derived from Doppler myocardial imaging indices in normal and infarcted myocardium. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 13:588-598
14. Heimdal A, Stoylen A, Torp H, Skaerpe T (1998) Real-time strain rate imaging of the left ventricle by ultrasound. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 11:1013-1019
15. Jamal F, Kukulski T, Sutherland GR, Weidemann F, D' hooge J, Bijnens B (2002) Can changes in systolic longitudinal deformation quantify regional myocardial function after an acute infarction? An ultrasonic strain rate and strain study. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 15:723-730
16. Herbots L, Maes F, Hooge JD, Claus P, Dymarkowski S, Mertens P et al (2004) Quantifying myocardial deformation throughout the cardiac cycle: a comparison of ultrasound strain rate, grey-scale M-mode and magnetic resonance imaging. Ultrasound Med Biol 30(5):591-598
17. Edvardsen T, Gerber BL, Garot J, Bluemke DA, Lima JA et al (2002) Quantitative assessment of intrinsic regional myocardial deformation by Doppler strain rate echocardiography in humans. Validation against three dimensional tagged magnetic resonance imaging. Circulation 106:50-56
18. Wiedemann F, Jamal F, Sutherland GR et al (2002) Myocardial function defined by strain rate and strain during alterations in inotropic states and heart rate. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 283(2):H792-H799
19. Morris JJ III, Pellom GL, Murphy CE, Salter DR, Goldstein JP, Wechsler AS (1987) Quantification of the contractile response to injury: assessment of the work-length relationship in the intact heart. Circulation 76:717-727
20. Thomas G (2004) Tissue Doppler echocardiography-a case of right tool, wrong use. Cardiovasc Ultrasound 2:12