Asymmetry during load-loss measurement of three-phase three-limb transformers

IEEE Transactions on Power Delivery

Volumn 22, Issue 3, 2007, Pages 1566-1574

  Escarela Perez, R ^a   Kulkarni, S V ^b   Kodela, N K ^b   Olivares Galvan, J C ^c  

^a UNIVERSIDAD AUTÓNOMA METROPOLITANA   (Mexico)

^b INDIAN INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY BOMBAY   (India)

^c Instituto Tecnologico Superior de Zapopan   (Mexico)

Author keywords

Asymmetry; Finite element analysis; Load loss; Mutual inductance; Transformer

Indexed keywords

ELECTRONIC EQUIPMENT TESTING; FINITE ELEMENT METHOD; INDUCTANCE; PORTS AND HARBORS; POWER TRANSFORMERS; THEOREM PROVING; THREE DIMENSIONAL;

ASYMMETRY; FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS; LOAD LOSS; MUTUAL INDUCTANCE; TRANSFORMER;

ELECTRIC TRANSFORMER TESTING;

EID: 45149102963     PISSN: 08858977     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1109/TPWRD.2007.899248     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. J. I. Parion, "Magnetizing unsymmetry in three-phase core-type transformers," Elect. Energy, pp. 330-336, Jul. 1957.
2. C. S. Walker, "The excitation requirement of 3-phase core-type 3-legged y-connected transformer," AIEE Trans., pp. 1113-1119, Dec. 1957.
3. A. S. Nene, S. V. Kulkarni, and K. Vijayan, "Asymmetrical magnetising phenomenon of three-phase core-type transformers," in Proc. Int. Conf. Transformers, TRAFOTECH, Jan. 1994, vol. 15, pp. IV 21-26.
4. S. V. Kulkarni and S. A. Khaparde, Transformer Engineering: Design and Practice. New York: Marcel Dekker, May 2004.
5. P. Picher, L. Bolduc, R. Gagnon, and G. Sybille, "Study of the apparent load loss unbalance in three-phase transformers," in Proc. 18th Annu. Can. Conf. Electrical and Computer Engineering, CCECE/CCGEI, Saskatoon, SK, Canada, May 2005, pp. 1473-1476.
6. W. H. Hayt and J. E. Kemmerly, Engineering Circuit Analysis, 5th ed. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1996.
7. D. Rodger and J. F. Eastham, "A formulation for low frequency eddy currents," IEEE Trans. Magn., vol. MAG-19, no. 15, pp. 2443-2446, Nov. 1983.
8. P. J. Leonard and D. Rodger, "Modelling voltage source coils using the reduced scalar potential method," IEEE Trans. Magn., vol. 28, no. 2, pp. 1615-1618, Mar. 1992.
9. A. B. J. Reece and T. W. Preston, Finite Element Methods in Electrical Power Engineering. New York: Oxford Univ. Press, 2000.
10. P. J. Leonard and D. Rodger, "A new method for cutting the magnetic scalar potential in multiply connected eddy current problems," IEEE Trans. Magn., vol. 25, no. 5, pp. 4132-4143, Sep. 1989.
11. P. J. Leonard, H. C. Lai, R. J. Hill-Cottingham, and D. Rodger, "Automatic implementation of cuts in multiply connected magnetic scalar regions for 3-D eddy current models," IEEE Trans. Magn., vol. 29, no. 2, pp. 1368-1371, Mar. 1993.
12. H. T. Luong, Y. Marecha, and G. Meunier, "Computation of 3-D current driven eddy current problems using cutting surfaces," IEEE Trans. Magn., vol. 33, no. 2, pp. 1314-1315, Mar. 1997.
13. J. P. A. Bastos and N. Sadowski, Electromagnetic Modeling by Finite Element Methods. New York: Marcel Dekker, 2003.
14. J. Sakellaris, G. Meunier, C. Gurin, and J. C. Sabormadiere, "Application of the impedance boundary condition in a finite element environment using the reduced potential formulation," IEEE Trans. Magn., vol. 27, no. 6, pp. 5022-5024, Nov. 1991.
15. D. Rodger and H. C. Lai, "A surface impedance method for 3-D time transient problems," IEEE Trans. Magn., vol. 35, no. 3, pp. 1369-1371, May 1999.
16. P. J. Leonard and D. Rodger, "3D finite element models and external circuits using the Aψ scheme with cuts," IEEE Trans. Magn. vol. 30, no. 5, pp. 3220-3223, Sep. 1994.
17. P. Zhou, W. N. Fu, D. Lin, S. Stanton, and Z. J. Cendes, "Numerical modeling of magnetic devices," IEEE Trans. Magn., vol. 40, no. 4, pp. 1803-1809, Jul. 2004.
18. M. V. K. Chari and S. J. Salon, Numerical Methods in Electromagnetism New York: Academic, 2000.