Evaluation of three input techniques for selection and annotation of physical objects through an augmented reality view

Proceedings - ISMAR 2006: Fifth IEEE and ACM International Symposium on Mixed and Augmented Reality

Volumn , Issue , 2006, Pages 33-36

  Thomas, Bruce H ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH AUSTRALIA   (Australia)

Author keywords

And evaluation; Annotation; Augmented reality; Selection; Wearable computer

Indexed keywords

MAMMALS; SURVEYS; WEARABLE COMPUTERS;

AND EVALUATION; ANNOTATION; COMPLETION TIME; IMAGE PLANE; INPUT TECHNIQUES; MOBILE AUGMENTED REALITY; PHYSICAL OBJECTS; SELECTION;

AUGMENTED REALITY;

EID: 45149101369     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1109/ISMAR.2006.297791     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (14)

1. Bauer, M., G. Kortuem, and Z. Segall. "Where are you pointing at?"; A study of remote collaboration in a wearable video-conference system, in The 3rd International Symposium on Wearable Computers. 1999. p. 151-158
2. Piekarski, W. and B.H. Thomas. Tinmith-Hand: unified user interface technology for mobile outdoor augmented reality and indoor virtual reality, in IEEE Virtual Reality, 2002. 2002. Orlando, FL: IEEE. p. 287-288
3. Bowman, D., E. Kruijff, J. LaViola, and I. Poupyrev, 3D User Interfaces: Theory and Practice. 2004: Addison-Wesley.
4. Pierce, J., A. Forsberg, M. Conway, R.Z. Hong, and M. Mine. Image plane interaction techniques in 3D immersive environments. in Symposium on Interactive 3D Graphics. 1997. Providence: ACM. p.
5. Bowman, D.A., D.B. Johnson, and L.F. Hodges, Testbed Evaluation of Virtual Environment Interaction Techniques. Presence, 2001. 10(1): p. 75-95.
6. Cochrane, P., D.J.T. Heatley, and K.H. Cameron. Telepresence - visual telecommunications into the next century. in 4th IEE Conference on Telecommunications. 1993. Manchester. p. 175-180
7. Bell, B., T. Hollerer, and S. Feiner, An annotated situation-awareness aid for augmented reality, in Proceedings of the 15th annual ACM symposium on User interface software and technology. 2002, ACM Press: Paris. p. 213-216.
8. Kurata, T., N. Sakata, M. Kourogi, H. Kuzuoka, and M. Billinghurst. Remote collaboration using a shoulder-worn active camera/laser. in Wearable Computers, 2004. ISWC 2004. Eighth International Symposium on. 2004. p. 62-69
9. Livingston, M.A., Evaluating human factors in augmented reality systems. Computer Graphics and Applications, IEEE, 2005. 25(6): p. 6-9.
10. Sands, J., S.W. Lawson, and D. Benyon. Do we need stereoscopic displays for 3D augmented reality target selection tasks? in Eighth International Conference on Information Visualisation. 2004. p. 633-638
11. Milgram, P. and D. Drascic. Perceptual effects in aligning virtual and real objects in augmented reality displays. in 41st Annual Meeting of Human Factors and Ergonomics Society. 1997. Albuquerque, NM. p. 1-9
12. Kato, H. and M. Billinghurst, Marker Tracking and HMD Calibration for a Video-based Augmented Reality Conferencing System, in Proceedings of the 2nd IEEE and ACM International Workshop on Augmented Reality '99. 1999: San Francisco, CA. p. 85-94.
13. Zucco, J.E., B.H. Thomas, and K. Grimmer. Evaluation of three wearable computer pointing devices for selection tasks. in Wearable Computers, 2005. Proceedings. Ninth IEEE International Symposium on. 2005. p. 178-185
14. Accot, J. and S. Zhai, Performance evaluation of input devices in trajectory-based tasks: an application of the steering law, in Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems. 1999: Pittsburgh. p. 466-472.