Phylogenetic relationship and song differences between closely related Bush Warblers (Cettia seebohmi and C. diphone)

Wilson Journal of Ornithology

Volumn 120, Issue 2, 2008, Pages 268-276

  Hamao, Shoji ^a   Veluz, Maria J S ^b   Saitoh, Takema ^c   Nishiumi, Isao ^a  

^a DEPARTMENT OF BOTANY   (Japan)

^b National Museum of the Philippines   (Philippines)

^c RIKKYO UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BOOTSTRAPPING; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DIVERGENCE; GENETIC VARIATION; PASSERINE; PHYLOGENY; RELATEDNESS; SONG;

CETTIA; CETTIA DIPHONE; CETTIA SEEBOHMI;

EID: 45149096801     PISSN: 15594491     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1676/07-039.1     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. AKAIKE, H. 1974. A new look at the statistical model identification. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control 19:716-723.
2. ANDERSON, M. J. AND R. N. CONNER. 1985. Northern Cardinal song in three forest habitats in eastern Texas. Wilson Bulletin 97:436-449.
3. BAKER, K. 1997. Warblers of Europe, Asia and Northern Africa. Helm identification guides. Christopher Helm Publishers, London, United Kingdom.
4. DE KORT, S. R., P. M. DEN HARTOG, AND C. TEN CATE. 2002. Diverge or merge? The effect of sympatric occurrence on the territorial vocalizations of the Vinaceous Dove Streptopelia vinacea and the Ring-necked Dove S. capicola. Journal of Avian Biology 33:150-158.
5. DELACOUR, C. J. 1942. The Bush Warblers of the genera Cettia and Bradypterus, with notes on allied genera and species. Ibis 84:509-519.
6. DICKINSON, E. C., R. S. KENNEDY, AND K. C. PARKES. 1991. The birds of the Philippines, an annotated check-list. British Ornithologists' Union, Oxford, United Kingdom.
7. FELSENSTEIN, J. 1985. Confidence limits on phylogenies: an approach using the bootstrap. Evolution 39:783-791.
8. FILARDI, C. E. AND R. G. MOYLE. 2005. Single origin of a pan-Pacific bird group and upstream colonization of Australasia. Nature 438:216-219.
9. FLEISCHER, R. C., C. E. MCINTOSH, AND C. L. TARR. 1998. Evolution on a volcanic conveyor belt: using phylogeographic reconstructions and K-Ar-based ages of the Hawaiian Islands to estimate molecular evolutionary rates. Molecular Ecology 7:533-545.
10. GRANT, W. R. O. 1894. On the birds of the Philippine Islands. Part II. The highlands of north Luzon, 5000 feet. Ibis (6th Series) 6:501-522.
11. HAMAO, S. 1992. Lack of pair-bond: a polygynous mating system of the Japanese Bush Warbler Cettia diphone. Japanese Journal of Ornithology 40:51-65.
12. HAMAO, S. 1993. Individual identification of male Japanese Bush Warblers Cettia diphone by song. Japanese Journal of Ornithology 41:1-7.
13. HAMAO, S. AND K. UEDA. 2000. Simplified song in an island population of the Bush Warbler Cettia diphone. Journal of Ethology 18:53-57.
14. HAMAO, S., M. J. S. VELUZ, AND I. NISHIUMI. 2006a. Difference in morphology between two closely related Bush Warblers, Cettia diphone and C. seebohmi, in Japan and the Philippines. Miscellaneous Reports of the Institute for Nature Study 37: 17-26.
15. HAMAO, S., M. J. S. VELUZ, AND I. NISHIUMI. 2006b. Species recognition by song between the Luzon Bush Warbler, Cettia seebohmi, and the Japanese Bush Warbler, C. diphone. Memoirs of the National Science Museum 44:21-29.
16. HELBIG, A. J. AND I. SEIBOLD. 1999. Molecular phylogeny of Palearctic-African Acrocephalus and Hippolais warblers (Aves: Sylviidae). Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 11:246-260.
17. HUELSENBECK, J. P. AND F. R. RONQUIST. 2001. Mr-Bayes: Bayesian inference of phylogenetic trees. Bioinformatics 17:754-755.
18. HUNTER, M. L. AND J. R. KREBS. 1979. Geographical variation in the song of the Great Tit, Parus major, in relation to ecological factors. Journal of Animal Ecology 48:759-785.
19. KAJITA, M. 2002. Within-species phytogeny and biogeography in Cettia diphone. Iden 56:42-46.
20. KAJITA, M., T. MANO, AND F. SATO. 2002. Two forms of Bush Warbler Cettia diphone occur on Okinawajima Island: re-evaluation of C. d. riukiuensis and C. d. restricta by multivariate analyses. Journal of Yamashina Institute for Ornithology 33:148-167.
21. KENNEDY, R. S., P. C. GONZALES, E. C. DICKINSON, H. C. MIRANDA JR., AND T. H. FISHER. 2000. A guide to the birds of the Philippines. Oxford University Press, Oxford, United Kingdom.
22. KUMAR, S., K. TAMURA, AND M. NEI. 2004. MEGA3: Integrated software for molecular evolutionary genetics analysis and sequence alignment. Briefings in Bioinformatics 5:150-163.
23. LECROY, M. AND F. K. BARKER. 2006. A new species of Bush-warbler from Bougainville Island and a monophyletic origin for southwest Pacific Cettia. American Museum Novitates 3511:1-20.
24. MATYJASIAK, P. 2005. Birds associate species-specific acoustic and visual cues: recognition of heterospecific rivals by male Blackcaps. Behavioral Ecology 16:467-471.
25. MOMOSE, H. 1986. Mechanism of maintaining territories by acoustic communication. Pages 127-157 in Reproductive strategies of birds (S. Yamagishi, Editor). Toukaidaigaku-shuppankai, Tokyo, Japan.
26. MOMOSE, H. 1999. Structure of territorial songs in the Japanese Bush Warbler (Cettia diphone). Memoirs of the Faculty of Science, Kyoto University (Series Biology) 16:55-65.
27. MOORE, W. S. AND V. R. DEFILIPPIS. 1997. The window of taxonomic resolution for phylogenies based on mitochondrial cytochrome b. Pages 83-113 in Avian molecular evolution and systematics (D. P. Mindel, Editor). Academic Press, San Diego, California, USA.
28. MORTON, E. S. 1975. Ecological sources of selection on avian sounds. American Naturalist 109:17-34.
29. NAKAMURA, T. AND M. NAKAMURA. 1995. Birds' life in Japan with color pictures: birds of mountain, woodland and field. Hoikusya, Osaka, Japan.
30. NISHIUMI, I. AND C.-H. KIM. 2004. Little genetic differences between Korean and Japanese populations in songbirds. National Science Museum Monographs 24:279-286.
31. ORENSTEIN, R. I. AND H. D. PRATT. 1983. The relationships and evolution of the southwest Pacific warbler genera Vitia and Psamathia (Sylviinae). Wilson Bulletin 95:184-198.
32. ORNITHOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF JAPAN. 2000. Check-list of Japanese birds. Sixth and Revised Edition. Ornithological Society of Japan, Obihiro, Japan.
33. POSADA, D. AND K. A. CRANDALL. 1998. Modeltest: testing the model of DNA substitution. Bioinformatics 14:817-818.
34. RICE, W. R. 1989. Analyzing tables of statistical tests. Evolution 43:223-225.
35. ROZENDAAL, F. G. 1987. Description of a new species of Bush Warbler of the genus Cettia Bonaparte, 1834 (Aves: Sylviidae) from Yamdena, Tanimber Islands, Indonesia. Zoologische Mededelingen 61:177-202.
36. RYAN, M. J. AND E. A. BRENOWITZ. 1985. The role of body size, phylogeny, and ambient noise in the evolution of bird song. American Naturalist 126:87-100.
37. SAITOU, N. AND M. NEI. 1987. The neighbor-joining method: a new method for reconstructing phylogenetic trees. Molecular Biology and Evolution 4:406-425.
38. SEARCY, W. A. AND E. A. BRENOWITZ. 1988. Sexual differences in species recognition of avian song. Nature 332:152-154.
39. SHY, E. 1983. The relation of geographical variation in song to habitat characteristics and body size in North American tanagers (Thraupinae: Piranga). Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 12:71-76.
40. SORENSON, M. D., J. C. AST, D. E. DIMCHEFF, T. YURI, AND D. P. MINDELL. 1999. Primers for a PCR-based approach to mitochondrial genome sequencing in birds and other vertebrates. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 12:105-114.
41. SWOFFORD, D. L. 2003. Phylogenetic analysis using parsimony (and other methods). Version 4. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, Massachusetts, USA.
42. WELLS, D. R. 1982. Biological species limits in the Cettia fortipes complex. Bulletin of the British Ornithologists' Club 102:57-62.