Neural networks based system identification techniques for model based fault detection of nonlinear systems

International Journal of Innovative Computing, Information and Control

Volumn 3, Issue 5, 2007, Pages 1073-1085

  Fekih, Afef ^a   Xu, Hao ^a   Chowdhury, Fahmida N ^a  

^a University of Louisiana at Lafayette   (United States)

Author keywords

Aircraft; Fault detection; Fully connected neural networks; Identification; Neural networks; Partially connected neural networks

Indexed keywords

EID: 45149091985     PISSN: 13494198     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Frank, D. M., S. X. Ding and B. Koppen-Seliger, Current developments in the theory of FDI, Proc. of the IFAC Safeprocess, Budapest, Hungary, pp.16-27, 2000.
2. Patton, R. J., Fault detection and diagnosis in aerospace systems using analytical redundancy, Proc. of IEE Coll. on Condition Monitoring and Fault Tolerance, pp.1/1-1/20, 1990.
3. Patton, R. J., R. Clark and P. M. Frank, Fault Diagnosis in Dynamic Systems: Theory and Application, Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall, 1989.
4. Gertler, J. J., Fault Detection and Diagnosis in Engineering Systems, Marcel Dekker, New York, 1998.
5. Gertler, J. J., Survey of model based failure detection and isolation in complex plants, IEEE Control Systems Magazine, vol.8, pp.3-11, 1988.
6. Basseville, M. and I. Nikiforov, Detection of Abrupt Changes-Theory and Application, Englwood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, 1993.
7. Chen, J. and R. J. Patton, Robust Model Based Fault Diagnosis for Dynamic Systems, Kluwer Academic Publishers, New York, 1998.
8. Chowdhury, F. N., B. Jiang and C. M. Belcastro, Reduction of false alarms in fault detection problems, International Journal of Innovative Computing, Information and Control, vol.2, no.3, pp.481-490, 2006.
9. Iserman, R., Process fault diagnosis based on modeling and estimation methods-a survey, Automation, vol.20, pp.387-404, 1984.
10. Stevens, B. and F. Lewis, Aircraft Control and Simulation, 2nd edition, John Wiley and Sons, Hoboken, New Jersey, 2003.
11. Chen, S., S. A. Billings and P. M. Grant, Nonlinear system identification using neural networks, International Journal of Control, vol.51, no.6, pp.1191-1214, 1990.
12. Haykin, S., Neural Networks: A Comprehensive Foundation, 2/E., Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, 1999.
13. Hornik, K., M. Stinchkomb and M. White, Multilayer feedforward networks are universal spproximators, Neural Networks, vol.2, pp.359-366, 1989.
14. Hagan, M. T., H. B. Demuth and M. H. Beale, Neural Network Design, PWS Publishing, Boston, 1996.
15. Norgard, M., O. Ravn, N. K. Poulsen and L. K. Hansen, Neural Networks for Modeling and Control of Dynamic Systems, Springer-Verlag, London, 2000.
16. Pham, D. T. and X. Liu, Neural Networks for Identification, Prediction, and Control, Springer-Verlag, New-York, 1995.
17. Polycarpou, M. M. and P. A. Ioannou, Modeling, identification and stable adaptive control of continuous-time nonlinear dynamical systems using neural networks, Proc. of the 1992 IEEE American Control Conference, pp.36-40, 1992.
18. Vachkov, G., Growing neural models for process identification and data analysis, International Journal of Innovative Computing, Information and Control, vol.2, no.l, pp.101-123, 2006.
19. Linden, V., D., CA.A.M., DASMAT-Delft University Aircraft Simulation Model and Analysis Tool, A Matlab/Simulink Environment for Flight Dynamics and Control Analysis, Report LR-781, Delft University of Technology, Delft, 1996.
20. Kotta, U., F. N. Chowdhury and S. Nomma, On realizability of neural networks-based-input-output models in the classical state-step form, Automatica, vol.42, pp.1211-1216, 2006.
21. Patton, R. J., C. J. Lopez and F. J. Uppal, Artificial intelligence approaches to fault diagnosis, IEEE Colloquium on Condition Monitoring, Machinery and External Structures, pp.5/1-5/18, 1999.
22. Kondo, T. and J. Ueno, Revised GMDH-type neural network algorithm with a feedback loop identifying sigmoid function neural network , International Journal of Innovative Computing, Information and Control, vol.2, no.5, pp.985-996, 2006.
23. Liu, G. P., Nonlinear Identification and Control, Springer-Verlag, London, 2001.
24. Ljung, L., System Identification: Theory for the User, 2/E., Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 1998.
25. Zhao, S., H. T. Su and T. J. McAvoy, Comparison of four neural net learning methods for dynamic system identification, IEEE Trans. on Neural Networks, vol.3, no.l, pp.122-130, 1992.
26. Elizondo, D. and E. Fiesler, A survey of partially connected neural networks, International Journal of Neural Systems, vol.8, no.5-6, pp.535-558, 1997.
27. Kang, S. and C. Isik, Partially connected feedforward neural networks structured by input types, IEEE Trans. Neural Networks, vol.16, no.l, pp.175-184, 2005.
28. Sietsma, J. and R. J. F. Dow, Neural net pruning-why and how, Proc. of the IEEE Int. Conf. Neural Networks, vol.l, pp.325-333, 1988.