Policy influences on community trail development

Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law

Volumn 33, Issue 3, 2008, Pages 407-427

  Eyler, Amy A ^a,e,f   Brownson, Ross C ^a   Evenson, Kelly R ^c,d   Levinger, David ^g,h,i,j   Maddock, Jay E ^k,l,m   Pluto, Delores ^n,o,p   Troped, Philip J ^w   Schmid, Thomas L ^e,s,t   Carnoske, Cheryl ^a,b   Richards, Katherine L ^q,r   Steinman, Lesley E ^g,u,v  

^a SAINT LOUIS UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b American Dietetic Association   (United States)

^c IL

^d American College of Sports Medicine

^e Physical Activity Policy Research Network (PAPRN)

^f AMERICAN PUBLIC HEALTH ASSOCIATION   (United States)

^g UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON   (United States)

^h and Transnational Anthropology

ⁱ Washington Coalition for Promoting Physical Activity   (United States)

^j WASHINGTON STATE DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION   (United States)

^k UNIVERSITY OF HAWAII   (United States)

^l UNIVERSITY OF RHODE ISLAND   (United States)

^m University of Rhode Island ^*

ⁿ University of South Carolina   (China)

^o UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA   (United States)

^p PRC's Collaborating Center

^q HAWAII STATE DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH   (United States)

^r UNIVERSITY OF HAWAII   (United States)

^s CENTERS FOR DISEASE CONTROL AND PREVENTION   (United States)

^t Active Living Research Program

^u Physical Activity Policy Research Network PAPRN

^v University of Washington PAPRN Advisory Board

^w PURDUE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

more..

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BICYCLE; COMMUNITY; FUNDING; GOVERNMENT; ORGANIZATION; PEDESTRIAN; POLICY; REVIEW; TRAFFIC AND TRANSPORT; UNITED STATES;

CONSUMER PARTICIPATION; ENVIRONMENT DESIGN; EXERCISE; FEDERAL GOVERNMENT; HUMANS; INTERVIEWS AS TOPIC; LOCAL GOVERNMENT; ORGANIZATIONAL CASE STUDIES; POLICY MAKING; PROGRAM DEVELOPMENT; UNITED STATES;

EID: 45149085805     PISSN: 03616878     EISSN: 15271927     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1215/03616878-2008-003     Document Type: Review

References (18)

1. Brownson, R. C., L. Hagood, S. L. Lovegreen, B. Britton, N. M. Caito, M. B. Elliott, J. Emery, et al. 2005. A Multilevel Ecological Approach to Promoting Walking in Rural Communities. Preventive Medicine 41:837-842.
2. Brownson, R., D. Haire-Joshu, and D. Luke. 2006. Shaping the Context of Health: A Review of Environmental and Policy Approaches in the Prevention of Chronic Diseases. Annual Review of Public Health 27:341-370.
3. Brownson, R., R. Housemann, D. Brown, J. Jackson-Thompson, A. King, B. Malone, and J. Sallis. 2000. Promoting Physical Activity in Rural Communities: Walking Trail Access, Use, and Effects. American Journal of Preventive Medicine 18:235-241.
4. Bull, F., R. Milligan, M. Rosenberg, and H. MacGowan. 2000. Physical Activity Levels of Western Australian Adults 1999. Perth, Australia: Health Department of Western Australia and Sport and Recreation Way2Go.
5. Economos, C., R. Brownson, M. DeAngelis, S. Foerster, C. Foreman, J. Gregson, S. Kumanyika, and R. Pate. 2001. What Lessons Have Been Learned from Other Attempts to Guide Social Change? Nutrition Reviews 59:S40-S56.
6. Evenson, K., A. Herring, and S. Huston. 2005. Evaluating Change in Physical Activity with the Building of a Multi-use Trail. American Journal of Preventive Medicine 28:177-185.
7. Ewing, R., S. Handy, R. Brownson, O. Clemente, and E. Winston. 2006. Identifying and Measuring Urban Design Qualities Related to Walkability. Journal of Physical Activity and Health 3 (suppl. 1): S223-S240.
8. Eyler, A., R. Brownson, S. Bacak, and R. Housemann. 2003. The Epidemiology of Walking for Physical Activity in the United States. Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise 35:1529-1536.
9. Federal Highway Administration. 2003. Safe, Accountable, Flexible, Efficient Transportation Equity Act of 2003: A Legacy for Users. www.fhwa.dot.gov/reauthorization/ safetea_bill.pdf.
10. Kingdon, J. 1995. Agendas, Alternatives, and Public Policies. New York: HarperCollins.
11. Lee, C., and A. V. Moudon. 2006. Correlates of Walking for Transportation or Recreation Purposes. Journal of Physical Activity and Health 3 (suppl. 1): S77-S98.
12. Pikora, T., B. Giles-Corti, M. Knuiman, F. Bull, K. Jamrozik, and R. Donovan. 2006. Neighborhood Environmental Factors Correlated with Walking near Home: Using SPACES. Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise 38:708-714.
13. Saint Louis University School of Public Health Prevention Research Center. 2005. Physical Activity Policy Research Network (PAPRN). prc.slu.edu/paprn.htm (accessed November 13, 2007).
14. Schmid, T., M. Pratt, and L. Witmer. 2006. A Framework for Physical Activity Policy Research. Journal of Physical Activity and Health 3 (suppl. 1): S20-S29.
15. Siegel, P., R. Brackbill, and G. Heath. 1995. The Epidemiology of Walking for Exercise: Implications for Promoting Activity among Sedentary Groups. American Journal of Public Health 85:706-710.
16. Troped, P. J., R. P. Saunders, R. R. Pate, B. Reininger, J. R. Ureda, and S. J. Thompson. 2001. Associations between Self-reported and Objective Physical Environmental Factors and Use of a Community Rail-Trail. Preventive Medicine 32:191-200.
17. U.S. Census Bureau. 2002. United States Census 2000 Demographic Profiles. October 31. www.census.gov/Press-Release/www/2002/demoprofiles.html.
18. Wiggs, I., R. Brownson, and E. Baker. 2006. If You Build It, They Will Come: Lessons from Developing Walking Trails in Rural Missouri. Health Promotion Practice, June 30. doi:10.1177/1524839906289233. hpp.sagepub.com/cgi/rapidpdf/ 1524839906289233v1.