The impact of foster care and Temporary Assistance for Needy Families (TANF) on women's drug treatment outcomes

Children and Youth Services Review

Volumn 30, Issue 8, 2008, Pages 942-954

  Lewandowski, Cathleen A ^a   Hill, Twyla J ^b  

^a STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK   (United States)

^b WICHITA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Drug treatment program; Foster care; TANF

Indexed keywords

EID: 45049085635     PISSN: 01907409     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.childyouth.2007.11.017     Document Type: Article

References (53)

1. Ashley O.S., Marsden M.E., and Brady T.M. Effectiveness of substance abuse treatment programming for women: A review. The American Journal of Drug and Alcohol Abuse 29 (2003) 19-53
2. Axinn W.G., Pearce L.D., and Ghimire D. Innovations in life history calendar applications. Social Science Research 28 (1999) 243-264
3. Azzi-Lessing L., and Olsen L.J. Substance abuse-affected families in the child welfare system: New challenges, new alliances. Social Work 41 1 (1996) 15-23
4. Beckman L.J. Treatment needs of women with alcohol problems. Alcohol Health and Research World 18 (1994) 206-211
5. Brady K.T., and Randall C.L. Gender differences in substance use disorders. The Psychiatric Clinics of North America. Addictive Disorders 22 (1999) 241-252
6. Bush I.R., and Sainz A. Preventing substance abuse from undermining permanency planning: Competencies at the intersection of culture, chemical dependency, and child welfare. Journal of Multicultural Social Work 5 1/2 (1997) 79-97
7. Carten A.J. Mothers in recovery: Rebuilding families in the aftermath of addiction. Social Work 41 (1996) 214-223
8. Center for Substance Abuse Treatment. Telling their stories: Reflections of the 11 original grantees that piloted residential treatment for women and children for CSAT. SAMSHA Publication No. SMA-01-3529 (2001), Center for Substance Abuse Treatment. Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration, Rockville, MD July 2001
9. Center for Substance Abuse Treatment (CSAT). Enhancing motivation for change in substance abuse treatment. Treatment Interview Protocol Series, #35, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Pub No. (SMA) 05-4081 (2005), Substance Abuse and Mental health Services Administration, Rockville, MD 1999
10. Chase-Lansdale P., Coley R.L., Lohman B.J., and Pittman L.D. Welfare reform: What about the children?. Welfare, Children, and Families Study, Policy Brief 02-1 (2006), John Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD. http://www.jhu.edu/~welfare (http://www.jhu.edu/~welfare), accessed November 23, 2006
11. Collins C.C., Grella C.E., and Hser Y. Effects of gender and level of parental involvement among parents in drug treatment. The American Journal of Drug and Alcohol Abuse 29 2 (2003) 237-261
12. Comfort M., and Kaltenbach K.A. Predictors of treatment outcomes for substance-abusing women: A retrospective study. Substance Abuse 21 1 (2000) 33-45
13. Craighead W.E., Craighead L.W., and Illardi S.S. Behavior therapies in historical perspective. In: Bongar B., and Beutler L.E. (Eds). Comprehensive Textbook of Psychotherapy (1995), Oxford University Press, New York 64-83
14. Day P., Robison S., and Sheikh L. Ours to keep: Building a community assessment strategy for child protection (1998), Child Welfare League of America, Washington DC
15. DiClemente C. Addiction and change: How addictions develop and addicted people recover (2006), Guilford Press, New York
16. Freeman D.A., Thornton D.C., Camburn D.A., and Young-DeMarco L. The life history calendar: A technique for collecting retrospective data. Sociological Methodology 18 (1988) 37-68
17. Gorske T.T., Larkby C., Daley D.C., Yenerall E., and Morrow L.A. Childhood abuse and psychiatric impairment in a sample of welfare to work women. Children and Youth Services Review 28 (2006) 1528-1541
18. Grella C.E., Hser Y.I., and Huang Y.C. Mothers in substance abuse treatment: Differences in characteristics based on involvement with child welfare services. Child Abuse and Neglect 30 1 (2006) 55-73
19. Gutman M.A., Ketterlinus R.D., and McLellan A.T. Characteristics of substance-abusing women on welfare: Findings from the evaluation of CASAWORKS for Families Pilot Demonstration. Evaluation Review 27 (2003) 597-628
20. Haight W., Jacobsen T., Black J., Kingery L., Sheridan K., and Molder C. "In these bleak days." Parent methamphetamine abuse and child welfare in the rural Midwest. Children and Youth Services Review 27 8 (2005) 949-971
21. Hanson G.R. In drug abuse, gender matters. NIDA Notes 17 2 (2002) 3-4
22. Howard J. Substance abuse treatment for persons with child abuse and neglect issues. Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration, Center for Substance Abuse Treatment (2000), US Department of Health and Human Services, Rockwell: MD #BKD343
23. Hughes P.H., Coletti S.D., Neri R.L., Urmann C.F., Stahl S., Sicillian D.M., et al. Retaining cocaine-abusing women in a therapeutic community: The effect of a child live-in program. American Journal of Public Health 85 (1995) 1149-1152
24. Ingersoll K.S., Lu L., and Haller D.L. Predictors of In-treatment relapse in perinatal substance abusers and impact on treatment retention: A prospective study. Journal of Psychoactive Drugs 27 (1995) 375-387
25. Keesee M., and Williams L. Profile of multi-challenged TANF recipients and challenges they face in achieving lifetime self-sufficiency (1997), Planning and Research Unit, Oklahoma Department of Human Services December, 1997
26. Kettinger L.A., Nair P., and Schuler M.E. Exposure to environmental risk factors and parenting attitudes among substance-abusing women. American Journal of Drug and Alcohol Abuse 26 (2000) 1-11
27. Knight D.K., Hood P.E., Logan S.M., and Chatham L.R. Residential treatment for women with dependent children: One agency's approach. Journal of Psychoactive Drugs 31 4 (1999) 339-351
28. Knight D.K., Logan S.M., and Simpson D.D. Predictors of program completion for women in residential substance abuse treatment. American Journal of Drug and Alcohol Abuse 27 1 (2001) 1-18
29. Kolden G.G., Howard K.I., Bankoff E.A., Maling M.S., and Martinovich S. Factors associated with treatment continuation: Implications for the treatment of drug dependence. In: Onken L.S., Blain J.D., and Boren J.D. (Eds). Beyond the Therapeutic Alliance: Keeping the Drug-Dependent Individual in Treatment. NIDA Research Monograph Series vol. 165 (1997), National Institute on Drug Abuse, Rockville, MD 110-130 DHHS Pub No. (ADM) 97-4142
30. Lam W.K., Wechsberg W.M., and Zule W.A. Slipping through the welfare reform cracks: African-American crack-using women. Academy for Health Services Research Policy Meeting vol. 19 (2002) 10
31. Leonhard C., Mulvey K., Gastfriend D.R., and Schwartz M. The Addiction Severity Index: A field study of internal consistency and validity. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment 18 (2000) 129-135
32. Lewandowski C.A., and GlenMaye L.F. Teams in child welfare settings: Interprofessional and collaborative processes. Families in Society: The Journal of Contemporary Human Services 83 3 (2002) 245-256
33. Lewandowski C.A., and Pierce L. Does family-centered out-of-home care work? Differential exit rates for children in a family-centered project. Social Work Research 28 (2004) 143-153
34. McLellan A.T., Luborsky L., O'Brien C.P., and Woody G.E. An improved evaluation method for substance abuse patients: The Addiction Severity Index. Journal of the Nervous and Mental Diseases 168 (1980) 26-33
35. McLellan A.T., Gutman M., Lynch K., McKay J.R., Ketterlinus R., Morgenstern J., et al. One-year outcomes from the CASAWORKS for Families: Intervention for substance-abusing women on welfare. Evaluation Review 27 (2003) 656-680
36. Metsch L.R., and Pollack H.A. Welfare reform and substance abuse. The Milbank Quarterly 83 (2005) 65-89
37. Metsch L.R., McCoy C.B., Miller M., McAnany M., and Pereyra M. Moving substance-abusing women from welfare to work. Journal of Public Health Policy 20 (1999) 36-55
38. Montoya I.D., Atkinson J.S., and Struse H.M. A comparison of psychosocial barriers among welfare recipients: Implications for drug treatment. Substance Use & Misuse 36 (2001) 771-788
39. Nelson-Zlupko L., Dore M.A., Kauffman E., and Kaltenbach K. Women in recovery: Their perceptions of treatment effectiveness. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment 13 (1995) 51-59
40. Nishimoto R.H., and Roberts A.C. Coercion and drug treatment for postpartum women. American Journal of Drug and Alcohol Abuse 27 (2001) 161-181
41. Pollack H.A., Danziger S., Jayakody R., and Seefeldt K.S. Substance use among welfare recipients: Trends and policy responses. Ford School (2001), University of Michigan. http://www.fordschool.umich.edu/research/poverty/pdf/jcpr_pollack.pdf (http://www.fordschool.umich.edu/research/poverty/pdf/jcpr_pollack.pdf),accessed October 22, 2006
42. Sacks J.Y., Drake R.E., Williams V.F., Banks S.M., and Herrell J.M. Utility of the time-line follow-back to assess substance use among homeless adults. The Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease 19 (2003) 145-153
43. Smith B.D. How parental drug use and drug treatment compliance relate to family reunification. Child Welfare 82 3 (2003) 335-365
44. Sobell L.C., and Sobell M.B. Timeline follow-back: A technique for assessing self-reported alcohol consumption. In: Litten R., and Allen J. (Eds). Measuring Alcohol Consumption (1992), Humana Press, New York 41-72
45. Sun A. Direct practice with substance abusing mothers in the child welfare system: A system perspective. Smith College Studies in Social Work 70 (2000) 441-457
46. Szuster R., Rich L., Chung A., and Bisconer S.W. Treatment retention in women's residential chemical dependency treatment: The effect of admission with children. Substance Use and Misuse 31 (1996) 1001-1013
47. Swarz J.A., Hsieh C., and Baumohl J. Disability payments, drug use and representative payees: An analysis of the relationships. Addiction 98 (2003) 965-975
48. Vinson D.C., Reidinger C., and Wilcosky T. Factors affecting the validity of a timeline follow-back interview. Journal of Studies on Alcohol 64 (2003) 733-740
49. Wechsberg W.M., Zule W.A., and Lam W.K. Facilitating empowerment for African-American women who use crack cocaine: Efficacy of a woman-focused, culturally specific intervention to reduce risk for HIV and increase self-sufficiency. American Journal of Public Health 94 (2004) 1165-1173
50. Willett J.B., and Singer J.D. Investigating onset, cessation, relapse, and recovery: Why you should, and how you can, use discrete-time survival analysis to examine event occurrence. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology 61 (1993) 952-965
51. Yamaguchi K. Event history analysis (1991), Sage, Newbury Park, CA
52. Young N.K., and Gardner S.L. Navigating the pathways: Lessons and promising practices in linking alcohol and drug services with child welfare. SAMSHA Publication No. SMA-04-3930 (2002), Center for Substance Abuse Treatment, Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration, Rockville, MD April 2002, Reprinted 2002 and 2004
53. Young N.K., Gardner S.L., and Dennis K. Responding to alcohol and other drug problems in child welfare: Weaving together practice and policy (1998), CWLA Press, Washington DC