Making thinking visible with atlas.ti: Computer assisted qualitative analysis as textual practices

Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung

Volumn 9, Issue 2, 2008, Pages

  Konopásek, Zdeněk ^a  

^a Center for Theoretical Study   (Czech Republic)

Author keywords

Analytic practices; CAQDAS; Grounded theory methodology; Humans and machines; Reading and writing; Textuality; Thinking; Visualisation

Indexed keywords

EID: 44949257150     PISSN: None     EISSN: 14385627     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. Ashmore, Malcolm & Reed, Darren (2000). Innocence and nostalgia in conversation analysis: The dynamic relations of tape and transcript [45 paragraphs]. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung / Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 1(3), Art.3, http://qualitafive-research.net/fqs-texte/3-00/3- 00ashtmorereed-e.htm [Date of access: February 17, 2008].
2. Bauman, Zygmunt (1991). Intimations of postmodernity. London: Routledge.
3. Becker, Howard S. (1993). Theory: The necessary evil. In David J. Flinders & Geoffrey E. Mills (Eds.), Theory and concepts in qualitative research: Perspectives from the field (pp.218-229). New York: Teachers College Press.
4. Berger, Peter L. & Luckmann, Thomas (1967). The social construction of reality: A treatise in the sociology of knowledge. Harmondsworth: Penguine Books.
5. Coffey, Amanda; Holbrook, Beverley & Atkinson, Paul (1996). Qualitative data analysis: Technologies and representations. Sociological Research Online, 1(1), http://www.socresonline.org.uk/1/1/4.html [Date of access: February 17, 2008].
6. Creswell, John W. (1997). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five traditions. London: Sage.
7. Denzin, Norman K. (1994). The art and politics of interpretation. In Norman K. Denzin & Yvonna S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (pp.500-515). London: Sage.
8. Denzin, Norman K. (1995). The poststructural crisis in the social sciences: Learning from James Joyce. In Richard Harvey Brown (Ed.), Postmodern representations: Truth, power, and mimesis in the human sciences and public culture (pp.38-59). Urbana & Chicago: University of Illinois Press.
9. Derrida, Jacques (1976). Of grammatology. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins Press.
10. Garfinkel, Harold (1967). Studies in ethnomethodology. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall.
11. Garfinkel, Harold (2002). Ethnomethodology's Program: Working out Durkheim's aphorism. Oxford: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, Inc.
12. Gieryn, Thomas F. (2006). City as truth-spot: Laboratories and field-sites in urban studies. Social Studies of Science, 36(1), 5-38.
13. Glaser. Barney & Strauss, Anselm L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. New York: Aldine de Gruyter.
14. Guba, Egon G. & Lincoln, Yvonna S. (1994). Competing paradigms in qualitative research. In Norman K. Denzin & Yvonna S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (pp.105-117). London: Sage.
15. Gubrium, Jaber F. & Holstein, James A. (1997). The new language of qualitative method. New York: Oxford University Press.
16. Holstein, James A. & Gubrium, Jaber F. (1994). Phenomenology, ethnomethodology, and interpretive practice. In Norman K. Denzin & Yvonna S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (pp.262-272). London: Sage.
17. Knorr-Cetina. Karin & Mulkay, Michael (Eds.) (1983). Science observed: Perspectives on the social studies of science. London: Sage.
18. Konopásek, Zdeněk (1997). Co si počít s počítačem v kvalitativním výzkumu: program ATLAS/ti vakci [What is computer-assisted qualitative data analysis good for? Atlas.ti in action]. Biograf, 12, 71-110.
19. Konopásek, Zdeněk (2005a). Aby myšlení bylo dobře vidět: Nad novou verzí programu Atlas.ti [Making our thinking visible: A review of the new version of Atlas.ti]. Biograf, 37, 89-109.
20. Konopásek, Zdeněk (2005b). Co znamená interpretovat text? [What it means to interpret a text of qualitative data?] In Michal Miovský, Ivo Čermák & Vladimír Chrz (Eds.), Kvalitativní přístup a metody ve vědách o člověku-IV: Vybrané aspekty teorie a praxe [Qualitative approach and methods in the human sciences-IV: Toward some aspects of theory and practice] (pp.85-95). Olomouc: FFUP.
21. Latour, Bruno (1986). Visualisation and cognition: Thinking with eyes and hands. Knowledge and Society: Studies in the Sociology of Culture Past and Present, 6, 1-40.
22. Latour, Bruno (1987). Science in action: How to follow scientists and engineers through society. Milton Keynes: Open University Press.
23. Latour, Bruno (1995). The "pedofil" of Boa Vista: A photo-philosophical montage. Common Knowledge, 4(1), 144-187.
24. Latour, Bruno & Woolgar, Steve (1986). Laboratory life: The construction of scientific facts (2nd. edition). Princeton: Princeton University Press.
25. Laurier, Eric & Brown, Barry (2005). Method and phenomena: Learning to see fish and flying objects. Paper prepared for the International Institute for Ethnomethodology and Conversation Analysis conference "International Perspectives", Bentley College, Waltham, MA 02452, USA.
26. Law, John (1986). The heterogeneity of texts. In Michel Callon, John Law & Arie Rip (Eds.), Mapping the dynamic of science and technology: Sociology of science in the real world (pp.67-83). London: Macmillan.
27. Lincoln, Yvonna S. & Denzin, Norman K. (1994). The fifth moment. In Norman K. Denzin & Yvonna S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (pp.575-586). London: Sage.
28. Lynch, Michael (1985). Art and artifact in laboratory science: A study of shop work and shop talk in a research laboratory. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
29. Lynch, Michael & Woolgar, Steve (Eds.) (1990). Representation in scientific practice. Cambridge: MIT Press.
30. Merleau-Ponty, Maurice (2002 [1945]). Phenomenology of perception. London: Routledge.
31. Mey, Gunter & Mruck. Katja (Eds.) (2007). Grounded theory reader. HSR Supplement, 19.
32. Miles, Matthew B. & Huberman, Michael A. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook (2nd. edition). Thousand Oaks: Sage.
33. Miller, Peter & O'Leary, Ted (1994). The factory as laboratory. Science in Context, 7(3), 469-496.
34. Muhr, Thomas & Friese, Susanne (2004). User's manual for Atlas.ti 5.0 (2nd. edition). Berlin: Scientific Software Development.
35. Richards, Tom & Richards, Lyn (1994). Using computers in qualitative research. In Norman K. Denzin & Yvonna S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (pp.445-462). London: Sage.
36. Schwandt, Thomas A. (1994). Constructivist, interpretivist approaches to human inquiry. In Norman K. Denzin & Yvonna S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (pp.118-137). London: Sage.
37. Seale, Clive (1999). The quality of qualitative research. London: Sage.
38. Snyder, Joel (1998). Visualization and visibility. In Caroline A. Jones & Peter Galison (Eds.), Picturing science-Producing art (pp.379-397). London: Routledge.
39. Strauss, Anselm L. (1987). Qualitative analysis for social scientists. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
40. Strauss, Anselm L. & Corbin. Juliet (1994). Grounded theory methodology: An overview. In Norman K. Denzin & Yvonna S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (pp.273-285). London: Sage.
41. Teil, Genevieve & Latour, Bruno (1995). The Hume machine: Can association networks do more than formal rules? Stanford Humanities Review, 4(2), 47-65.