Value of percutaneous kidney biopsy in the management of solid renal tumours less or equal to 4 cm;Intérêts des ponctions biopsies rénales percutanées dans la prise en charge des tumeurs solides du rein inférieures ou égales à 4 cm

Progres en Urologie

Volumn 18, Issue 6, 2008, Pages 337-343

  Rybikowski, S ^a   Tomatis, L ^a   Arroua, F ^a   Ragni, E ^a   Rossi, D ^a   Bastide, C ^a  

^a HÔPITAL NORD   (France)

Author keywords

Renal biopsies; Renal tumours less or equal to 4 cm

Indexed keywords

AGED; ARTICLE; BIOPSY; COMPARATIVE STUDY; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSIS; EVALUATION; FEMALE; HUMAN; KIDNEY; KIDNEY TUMOR; MALE; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PATHOLOGY; RADIOGRAPHY; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY;

AGED; BIOPSY; DIAGNOSIS, DIFFERENTIAL; FEMALE; HUMANS; KIDNEY; KIDNEY NEOPLASMS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; TOMOGRAPHY, X-RAY COMPUTED;

EID: 44949248288     PISSN: 11667087     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.purol.2008.03.024     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. Duchene D.A., Lotan Y., Cadeddu J.A., Sagalowsky A.I., and Koeneman K.S. Histopathology of surgically managed renal tumors: analysis of a contempory series. Urology 62 5 (2003) 827-830
2. Remzi M., Ozsoy M., Klingler H.C., Suzani M., Waldert M., Seitz C., et al. Are small renal tumors harmless? Analysis of histopathological features according to tumors 4 cm or less in diameter. J Urol 176 3 (2006) 896-899
3. Neuzillet Y., Lechevalier E., Andre M., Daniel L., and Coulange C. Accuracy and clinical role of fine needle percutaneous biopsy with computerized tomography guidance of small renal masses. J Urol 171 5 (2004) 1802-1805
4. Lebret T., Poulain J.E., Molinie V., Herve J.M., Denoux Y., Guth A., et al. Percutaneous core biopsy for renal masses: indications, accuracy and results. J Urol 178 (2007) 1184-1188
5. Lechevalier E., Andre M., Barriol D., Daniel L., Eghazarian C., and De Fromont M. Fine-needle percutaneous biopsy of renal masses with helical CT guidance. Radiology 216 (2000) 506
6. Jaff A., Molinie V., Mellot F., Guth A., Lebret T., and Scherrer A. Evaluation of imaging-guided fine needle percutaneous biopsy of renal masses. Eur Radiol 15 8 (2005) 1721-1726
7. Neuzillet Y., Lechevallier E., Andre M., Daniel L., Nahon O., and Coulange C. Follow-up of renal oncocytoma diagnosed by percutaneous tumor biopsy. Urology 66 (2005) 1181-1185
8. Combes F., Saidi A., Delaporte V., Lechevallier E., Andre M., Daniel L., et al. Les tumeurs tubulo-papillaires du rein : intérêt pronostique de la distinction type 1/type 2. À propos de 58 cas. Prog Urol 15 (2005) 1062-1069
9. Delahunt B., and Elbe J.N. Papillary renal cell carcinoma: a clinicopathologic and immunohistochemical study of 105 tumors. Mod Path 10 (1997) 537-544
10. Herr H.W. Partial nephrectomy for unilateral renal carcinoma and a normal controlateral kidney: 10-year follow-up. J Urol 161 (1999) 33-34
11. Mejean A., Hopirtean V., Bazin J.P., Larousserie F., et al. Prognostic factors for the survival of patients with papillary renal cell carcinoma: meaning of histological typing and multifocality. J Urol 170 3 (2003) 764-767
12. Lerner S.E., Hawkins C.A., Blute M.L., et al. Disease outcome in patients with low renal cell carcinoma treated with nephron sparing of radical surgery. J Urol 167 (2002) 884-889 [discussion 889-90]
13. Patard J.J., Shvarts O., and Lam J.S. Safety and efficacy of partial nephrectomy for all T1 tumors based on an international multicenter experience. J Urol 171 (2004) 2181-2185
14. Uzzo R.G., and Novick A.C. Nephron-sparing surgery for renal tumors: indications, techniques and outcomes. J Urol 166 (2001) 6-18
15. Lau W, Blute ML, Zincke H. Matched comparison of radical nephrectomy versus elective nephron sparing surgery for renal cell carcinoma: evidence for increased renal failure on long term follow-up (greater than 10 years). J Urol 2000;163(Suppl.):153, [abstract 681].