Early preparation of experimentally elicited minimal responses

Proceedings of the 6th SIGdial Workshop on Discourse and Dialogue

Volumn , Issue , 2005, Pages 11-18

  Wesseling, Wieneke ^a   Van Son, R J J H ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Dialogs; Intonation; Minimal responses; Random walk; Response times; Spoken language processing

Indexed keywords

DIALOGS; INTONATION; MINIMAL RESPONSES; RANDOM WALK; SPOKEN LANGUAGE PROCESSING;

RESPONSE TIME (COMPUTER SYSTEMS);

EID: 44949243508     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (14)

1. Bailly, G. (2001). Close shadowing natural vs synthetic speech. In Proceedings of the 4th ISCA Tutorial and Research Workshop on Speech Synthesis, SSW4, page http://www.ssw4.org/.
2. Boersma, P. (2001). Praat, a system for doing phonetics by computer. Glot International, 5:341-345.
3. Boersma, P. and Weenink, D. (2004). Praat 4.2: doing phonetics by computer. Computer program: http://www.praat.org/.
4. Caspers, J. (2003). Local speech melody as a limiting factor in the turn-taking system in dutch. Journal of Phonetics, 31(2):251-276. (Pubitemid 36593554)
5. Liddicoat, A. J. (2004). The projectability of turn constructional units and the role of prediction in listening. Discourse Studies, 6(4):449-469.
6. Oostdijk, N. (2000). The Spoken Dutch Corpus, overview and first evaluation. In Gravilidou, M., Carayannis, G., Markantonatou, S., Piperidi, S., and Stainhaouer, G., editors, Proceedings of LREC-2000, volume 2, pages 887-894.
7. Oostdijk, N., Goedertier, W., Eynde, F. V., Boves, L., Martens, J., Moortgat, M., and Baayen., H. (2002). Experiences from the Spoken Dutch Corpus project. In Rodriguez, M. and Araujo, C. S., editors, Proceedings of LREC-2002, volume 2, pages 340-347.
8. Pickering, M. J. and Garrod, S. (2004). Toward a mechanistic psychology of dialogue. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 27(02):169-226.
9. Posner, M. I. (2005). Timing the brain: Mental chronom-etry as a tool in neuroscience. PLoS Biology, 3(2):e51.
10. Sacks, H., Schegloff, E. A., and Jefferson, G. (1974). A simplest systematics for the organization of turn taking for conversation. Language, 50(4):696-735.
11. Sigman, M. and Dehaene, S. (2005). Parsing a cognitive task: A characterization of the mind's bottleneck. PLoS Biology, 3(2):e37.
12. SPEX (Speech Processing Expertise Centre). Rad-boud University Nijmegen, the Netherlands: http://www.spex.nl.
13. van Son, R. J. J. H. (2005). A study of pitch, formant, and spectral estimation errors introduced by three lossy speech compression algorithms. Acta Acustica united with Acustica, 91(4):771-778. (Pubitemid 41068114)
14. Wesseling, W. and van Son, R. J. J. H. (in press). Timing of experimentally elicited minimal responses as quantitative evidence for the use of intonation in projecting TRPs. In Proceedings of Interspeech 2005, Lisbon.