A rapid prototyping model for biomechanical evaluation of pelvic osteotomies

Biomedizinische Technik

Volumn 53, Issue 2, 2008, Pages 65-69

  Pressel, Thomas ^a   Max, Stefan ^b   Pfeifer, Roman ^b   Ostermeier, Sven ^b   Windhagen, Henning ^b   Hurschler, Christof ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL MARBURG   (Germany)

^b HANNOVER MEDICAL SCHOOL   (Germany)

Author keywords

Biomechanics; Computed tomography; Dysplasia; Laser sintering; Polyamide

Indexed keywords

ANTHROPOMETRY; BIOMECHANICS; COMPUTERIZED TOMOGRAPHY; CONCURRENT ENGINEERING; DIAGNOSTIC RADIOGRAPHY; HIP PROSTHESES; IMAGING TECHNIQUES; JOB ANALYSIS; MECHANICS; MEDICAL IMAGING; POLYMERS; PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT; PULSED LASER DEPOSITION; RAPID PROTOTYPING; SINTERING; TECHNOLOGY; THREE DIMENSIONAL; TOMOGRAPHY; WEIGHING;

(+ MOD 2N) OPERATION; BIOMECHANICAL EVALUATION; BIOMECHANICAL SIMULATIONS; BODY WEIGHT; COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY (CT); CONTACT AREAS; DATA SETS; ENGINEERING MODEL (EM); EXPERIMENTAL SET UPS; HIP JOINTS; JOINT MOMENTS; MEAN FORCES; ONE-LEGGED; PROXIMAL FEMUR; RAPID PROTOTYPING MODEL; RESULTANT FORCES; SELECTIVE LASER SINTERING; THREE DIMENSIONAL (3D);

MODEL STRUCTURES;

POLYAMIDE;

ABDUCTOR MUSCLE; ACCURACY; ANATOMY; ARTICLE; BIOMECHANICS; BODY WEIGHT; BONE DYSPLASIA; CARTILAGE; CASE REPORT; CHILD; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; EXPERIMENTAL MODEL; EXTENSOR MUSCLE; FEMALE; FEMUR; GEOMETRY; GLUTEUS MAXIMUS MUSCLE; HIP; HUMAN; JOINT; LASER; MUSCLE FORCE; PELVIS OSTEOTOMY; POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD; PREOPERATIVE EVALUATION; ROBOTICS; TENSILE STRENGTH;

BIOPHYSICAL PROCESSES; CHILD; FEMALE; HIP DISLOCATION, CONGENITAL; HUMANS; MODELS, ANATOMIC; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; OSTEOTOMY; PELVIC BONES;

EID: 44949205363     PISSN: 00135585     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1515/BMT.2008.010     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Abbott JR, Netherway DJ, Wingate PG, et al. Computer generated mandibular model: surgical role. Aust Dent J 1998; 43: 373-378.
2. Aung SC, Tan BK, Foo CL, Lee ST. Selective laser sintering: application of a rapid prototyping method in craniomaxillofacial reconstructive surgery. Ann Acad Med Singapore 1999; 28: 739-743.
3. Bayraktar HH, Morgan EF, Niebur GL, Morris GE, Wong EK, Keaveny TM. Comparison of the elastic and yield properties of human femoral trabecular and cortical bone tissue. J Biomech 2004; 37: 27-35.
4. Berry E, Brown JM, Connell M, et al. Preliminary experience with medical applications of rapid prototyping by selective laser sintering. Med Eng Phys 1997; 19: 90-96.
5. Bohm P, Brzuske A. Salter innominate osteotomy for the treatment of developmental dysplasia of the hip in children: results of seventy-three consecutive osteotomies after twenty-six to thirty-five years of follow-up. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2002; 84-A: 178-186.
6. Brown GA, Milner B, Firoozbakhsh K. Application of computer-generated stereolithography and interpositioning template in acetabular fractures: a report of eight cases. J Orthop Trauma 2002; 16: 347-352.
7. Choi JY, Choi JH, Kim NK, et al. Analysis of errors in medical rapid prototyping models. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2002; 31: 23-32.
8. de Kleuver M, Kapitein PJ, Kooijman MA, van LJ, Pavlov PW, Veth RP. Acetabular coverage of the femoral head after triple pelvic osteotomy: no relation to outcome in 51 hips followed for 8-15 years. Acta Orthop Scand 1999; 70: 583-588.
9. Delp SL, Bleck EE, Zajac FE, Bollini G. Biomechanical analysis of the Chiari pelvic osteotomy. Preserving hip abductor strength. Clin Orthop 1990; 5: 189-198.
10. Dora C, Mascard E, Mladenov K, Seringe R. Retroversion of the acetabular dome after Salter and triple pelvic osteotomy for congenital dislocation of the hip. J Pediatr Orthop B 2002; 11: 34-40.
11. Doyle SM, Bowen JR. Types of persistent dysplasia in congenital dislocation of the hip. Acta Orthop Belg 1999; 65: 266-276.
12. Giori NJ, Trousdale RT. Acetabular retroversion is associated with osteoarthritis of the hip. Clin Orthop 2003; 417: 263-269.
13. Hamada T. [An experimental analysis of three-dimensional hip joint force after pelvic osteotomies]. Nippon Seikeigeka Gakkai Zasshi 1989; 63: 335-344.
14. Hildreth BE, Marcellin-Little DJ, Roe SC, Harrysson OL. In vitro evaluation of five canine tibial plateau leveling methods. Am J Vet Res 2006; 67: 693-700.
15. Howk D, Chu TM. Design variables for mechanical properties of bone tissue scaffolds. Biomed Sci Instrum 2006; 42: 278-283.
16. Lengsfeld M, Bassaly A, Boudriot U, Pressel T, Griss P. Size and direction of hip joint forces associated with various positions of the acetabulum. J Arthroplasty 2000; 15: 314-320.
17. Levy RA, Guduri S, Crawford RH. Preliminary experience with selective laser sintering models of the human temporal bone. Am J Neuroradiol 1994; 15: 473-477.
18. Sefelin Z, Kunz G, Wilcke G, Staudt J, Schulz E, Loetzke HH. [Developmental stages in the production of a model of the female pelvis in natural size from Kalloplast CS-techn., and in 1:3,7 magnification from polyurethan-foam]. Verh Anat Ges 1977; 71: 1463-1465.
19. Suzuki M, Ogawa Y, Hagiwara A, Yamaguchi H, Ono H. Rapidly prototyped temporal bone model for otological education. ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec 2004; 66: 62-64.
20. Zajac FE. Muscle and tendon: properties, models, scaling, and application to biomechanics and motor control. Crit Rev Biomed Eng 1989; 17: 359-411.