An attitudinal explanation of biases in the criminal justice system: An empirical testing of defensive attribution theory

Crime and Delinquency

Volumn 54, Issue 3, 2008, Pages 457-481

  Herzog, Sergio ^a  

^a HEBREW UNIVERSITY OF JERUSALEM   (Israel)

Author keywords

Defensive attribution theory; Israel; Judicial biases; Personal similarity; Seriousness of crime scenarios

Indexed keywords

EID: 44949201525     PISSN: 00111287     EISSN: 1552387X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0011128707308158     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. Allport, G.W. (1954). The nature of prejudice. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
2. Arce, R., Farina, F. & Sobral, J. (1996). From juror to jury decisions making. In G. Davies et al. (Eds.), Psychology, law and criminal justice (pp. 337-343). New York: Walter de Gruyter.
3. Baldwin, M.R., & Kleinke, C.L. (1994). Effects of severity of accident, intent, and "alcoholism is a disease" excuse on judgments of a drunk driver. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 24, 2097-2109.
4. Bell, S.T., Kuriloff, P.J., & Lottes, I. (1994). Understanding attributions of blame in stranger rape and date rape situations. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 24 (19). 1719-1734.
5. Capozza, D., & Brown, R. (2000). Social identity processes: Trends in theory and research. London: Sage.
6. Corbett, C., & Simon, F. (1991). Police and public perceptions of the seriousness of traffic offenses. British Journal of Criminology, 31, 153-164.
7. Daly, K., & Tonry, M. (1997). Gender, race and sentencing. In M. Tonry (Ed.), Crime and justice: A review of research (Vol. 22, pp. 201-242). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
8. Dexter, H.R., Penrod, S., Linz, D., & Saunders, D. (1997). Attributing responsibility to female victims after exposure to sexually violent films. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 27 (24). 2149-2171.
9. Elkins, T.J., Phillips, J.S., & Konopaske, R. (2002). Gender-related biases in evaluations of sex discrimination allegations: Is perceived threat the key ? Journal of Applied Psychology, 87 (2). 280-292.
10. Farnworth, M., & Teske, Jr., R.H.C. (1995). Gender differences in felony court processing: Three hypotheses of disparity. Women and Criminal Justice, 6 (2). 23-44.
11. Feather, N.T. (1996). Domestic violence, gender, and perceptions of justice. Sex Roles, 35 (7 / 8). 507-519.
12. Hawkins, K. (1993). The uses of discretion. New York: Oxford University Press.
13. Herzog, S. (2003). Does the ethnicity of offenders in crime scenarios affect public perceptions of crime seriousness? A randomized survey experiment in Israel. Social Forces, 82 (2). 757-781.
14. Hox, J.J., Kreft, I.G.G., & Hermkins, P.L. (1991). The analysis of factorial surveys. Sociological Methods and Research, 19, 493-510.
15. Kouabenan, D.R., Gilibert, D., Medina, M., & Bouzon, F. (2001). Hierarchical position, gender, accident severity, and causal attribution. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 31 (3). 553-575.
16. Landsman, S., & Rakos, R. (1994). A preliminary inquiry into the effect of potentially biasing information on judges and jurors in civil litigation. Behavioral Sciences and the Law, 12, 113-126.
17. Levi, M., & Jones, S. (1985). Public and police perceptions of crime seriousness in England and Wales. British Journal of Criminology, 25 (3). 234-250.
18. Locke, L.M., & Richman, C.L. (1999). Attitudes toward domestic violence: Race and gender issues. Sex Roles, 40 (3-4). 227-247.
19. Marciniak, L.M. (1998). Adolescent attitudes toward victim precipitation of rape. Violence and Victims, 13 (3). 287-300.
20. McCleary, R., O'Neil, M., Epperlein, T., Jones, C., & Gray, R. (1981). Effects of legal education and work experience on perceptions of crime seriousness. Social Problems, 28, 276-289.
21. Neale, J., & Liebert, R. (1986). Science and behavior. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
22. O'Connell, M., & Whelan, A. (1996). Taking wrongs seriously: Public perceptions of crime seriousness. British Journal of Criminology, 36 (2). 299-318.
23. Osbeck, L., Moghaddam, F.M., & Perreault, S. (1997). Similarity and attraction among majority and minority groups in a multicultural context. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 21 (1). 113-123.
24. Radelet, M. (1991). Racial characteristics and the imposition of the death penalty. American Sociological Review, 46, 918-927.
25. Ralph, P.H., Sorensen, M., & Marquart, J.W. (1992). A comparison of death-sentenced and incarcerated murderers in pre-Furman Texas. Justice Quarterly, 9, 185-209.
26. Rossi, P., & Anderson, A. (1982). The factorial survey approach: An introduction. In P. Rossi & S. Nock (Eds.), Measuring social judgments: The factorial survey approach (pp. 1-39). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
27. Rossi, P., & Berk, R. (1997). Just punishments: Federal guidelines and public views compared. New York: Aldine de Gruyter.
28. Rossi, P., Simpson, J., & Miller, J. (1985). Beyond crime seriousness: Fitting the punishment to the crime. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 1 (1). 59-89.
29. Rushton, J.P. (1989). Genetic similarity, human altruism, and group selection. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 12, 503-559.
30. Sampson, R.J., & Lauritsen, J.L. (1997). Racial and ethnic disparities in crime and criminal justice in the United States. In M. Tonry (Ed.), Ethnicity, crime and immigration: Comparative and cross-national perspectives (Vol. 21, pp. 311-374). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
31. Saunders, D.G., & Size, P.B. (1986). Attitudes about woman abuse among police officers, victims, and victim advocates. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 1 (1). 25-42.
32. Sears, D.O. (1986). College sophomores in the laboratory: Influences of a narrow data base on social psychology's view of human nature. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 515-530.
33. Sellin, T., & Wolfgang, M. (1964). The measurement of delinquency. New York: Wiley.
34. Shaver, K.G. (1970). Defensive attribution: Effects of severity and relevance on the responsibility assigned for an accident. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 14, 101-113.
35. Shoham, E. (2000). The battered wife's perception of the characteristics of her encounter with the police. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 44 (2). 242-257.
36. Steffensmeier, D., Ulmer, J., & Kramer, J. (1998). The interaction of race, gender, and age in criminal sentencing: The punishment cost of being young, Black, and male. Criminology, 36, 763-797.
37. Stith, S.M. (1990). Police response to domestic violence: The influence of individual and familial factors. Violence and Victims, 5 (1). 37-49.
38. Tajfel, H. (1981). Human groups and social categories: Studies in social psychology. New York: Cambridge University Press.
39. Tajfel, H. (1982). Social identity and intergroup relations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
40. Tajfel, H., & Turner, J.C. (1979). An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. In W. G. Austin & S. Worchel (Eds.), The social psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 33-47). Monterey, CA: Brooks/Cole.
41. Thornton, B. (1992). Repression and its mediating influence on the defensive attribution of responsibility. Journal of Research in Personality, 26, 44-57.
42. Turner, J.C., Hogg, M.A., Oakes, P.J., Reicher, S.D., & Wetherell, M.S. (1987). Discovering the social group: A self-categorization theory. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
43. Walsh, A. (1987). The sexual stratification hypothesis and sexual assault in light of the changing conceptions of race. Criminology, 25, 153-173.
44. Wilson, R.J., & Jonah, B.A. (1988). Assignment of responsibility and penalties for an impaired driving incident. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 18 (7). 564-583.