Modeling of shock wave propagation in large amplitude ultrasound

Ultrasonic Imaging

Volumn 30, Issue 1, 2008, Pages 44-60

  Pinton, Gianmarco F ^a   Trahey, Gregg E ^a  

^a Duke University   (United States)

Author keywords

Finite differences; KZK; Lithotripsy; Nonlinear; Shock wave; Ultrasound

Indexed keywords

NONLINEAR EQUATIONS; NUMERICAL METHODS; PHYSICAL PROPERTIES; SHOCK WAVES; ULTRASONICS; WAVE PROPAGATION;

FINITE DIFFERENCES; HIGH INTENSITY FOCUSED ULTRASOUND; HYPERBOLIC CONSERVATION LAWS; LITHOTRIPSY; NONLINEAR; RANKINE-HUGONIOT RELATIONS; THREE DIMENSIONAL SIMULATIONS; TIME-DOMAIN NUMERICAL METHODS;

TIME DOMAIN ANALYSIS;

WATER;

ARTICLE; CALCULATION; DIFFRACTION; HIGH INTENSITY FOCUSED ULTRASOUND; MATHEMATICAL ANALYSIS; MATHEMATICS; MODEL; PARAMETER; PRESSURE; RANKINE HUGONIOT RELATION; SHOCK WAVE; SIMULATION; TIME; ULTRASONIC LITHOTRIPSY;

EID: 44949186598     PISSN: 01617346     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/016173460803000106     Document Type: Article

References (54)

1. Averkiou MA, Hamilton MF. Nonlinear distortion of short pulses radiated by plane and focused circular pistons, J Acoust Soc Amer 102, 2539-2548 (1997).
2. Hamilton MF, Blackstock DT, Nonlinear Acoustics (Academic Press, San Diego, 1997).
3. Aanonsen SI, Barkve T, Tjøtta JN, Tjøtta S. Distortion and harmonic generation in the nearfield of a finite amplitude sound beam, J Acoust Soc Amer 75, 749-768 (1984).
4. Hamilton MF, Tjøtta JN, Tjøtta S. Nonlinear effects in the farfield of a directive sound source, J Acoust Soc Amer 78, 202-216 (1985).
5. Baker AC, Humphrey VF,Anastasiadis K. The nonlinear pressure field of a plane circular piston - theory and experiment, J Acoust Soc Amer 84, 1483-1487 (1988).
6. Nachef S, Cathignol D, Tjøtta JN, Berg AM, Tjøtta S. Investigation of a high intensity sound beam from a plane transducer, experimental and theoretical results, J Acoust Soc Amer 98, 2303-2323 (1995).
7. TenCate JA. An experimental investigation of the nonlinear pressure field produced by a plane circular piston, J Acoust Soc Amer 94, 1084-1089 (1993).
8. Baker AC. Nonlinear pressure fields due to focused circular apertures, J Acoust Soc Amer 91, 713-717 (1992).
9. Averkiou M Hamilton MF. Measurements of harmonic generation in a focused finite-amplitude sound beam, J Acoust Soc Amer 98, 3439-3442 (1995).
10. Baker AC Prediction of non-linear propagation in water due to diagnostic medical ultrasound equipment, Phys Med Biol 36, 1457-1464 (1991).
11. Baker AC, Humphrey VF. Distortion and high-frequency generation due to nonlinear propagation of short ultrasonic pulses from a plane circular piston, J Acoust Soc Amer 92, 1699-1705 (1992).
12. Baker AC, Berg AM, S. A, Tjøtta JN. The nonlinear pressure field of plane, rectangular apertures -experimental and theoretical results, J Acoust Soc Amer 97, 3510-3517 (1995).
13. Bernsten J. Numerical calculations of finite amplitude sounde beams, in Frontiers of Nonlinear Acoustics, Hamilton MF, Blackstock, D, eds., pp. 191-196 (Elsevier, London, 1990).
14. Christopher T and Parker KJ. New approaches to nonlinear diffractive field propagation, J Acoust Soc Amer 90, 488-499 (1991).
15. Christopher T. Modeling the Dornier-HM3-lithotripter, J Acoust Soc Amer 96, 3088-3095(1994).
16. Christopher T, Carstensen EL. Finite amplitude distortion and its relationship to linear derating formulae for diagnostic ultrasound systems, Ultrasound Med Biology 22, 1103-1116 (1996).
17. Christopher T. Computing the mechanical index, J Ultrasound Med 18, 63-68 (1999).
18. Christopher T. Experimental investigation of finite amplitude distortion-based, second harmonic pulse echo ultrasonic imaging, IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelec Freq Contr 45, 158-162 (1998).
19. Tavakkoli J, Cathignol D, Souchon R, Sapozhnikov O. Modeling of pulsed finite-amplitude focused sound beams in time domain, J Acoust Soc Amer 104, 2061-2072 (1998).
20. Khokhlova VA, Sapozhnikov OA. Modification of the spectral method for describing nonlinear acoustic waves containing shocks, J Acoust Soc Amer 96, 3321 (1994).
21. Khokhlova V, Souchon R, Tavakkoli J, Sapozhnikov O, Cathignol D. Numerical modeling of finite-amplitude sound beams: shock formation in the near field of a cw plane piston source, J Acoust Soc Amer 110, 95-108 (2001).
22. Lee YS, Hamilton MF, Time-domain modeling of pulsed finite-amplitude sound beams, J Acoust Soc Amer 97, 906-917 (1995).
23. Cleveland RO, Hamilton MF, Blackstock D. Time-domain modeling of finite-amplitude sound in relaxing fluids, J Acoust Soc Amer 99, 3312-3318 (1996).
24. Averkiou MA, Cleveland RO. Modeling of an electrohydraulic lithotripter with the kzk equation, J Acoust Soc Amer 106, 102-112 (1999).
25. Li YD, Zagzebski JA. Computer model for harmonic ultrasound imaging, IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelec Freqy Contr 47, 1259-1272 (2000).
26. Zemp R, Tavakkoli J, Cobbold R. Modeling of nonlinear ultrasound propagation in tissue from array transducers, J Acoust Soc Amer 113, 139-152 (2003).
27. Yang X, Cleveland RO. Time domain simulation of nonlinear acoustic beams generated by rectangular pistons with application to harmonic imaging, J Acoust Soc Amer 117, 113-123 (2005).
28. Pinton GF, Trahey GE. Numerical methods for axisymmetric and 3D nonlinear beams, in Proc SPIE Med Imag 2005: Ultrasonic Imaging and Signal Processing, vol. 5750, pp. 388-396 (2005).
29. Kennedy JE, ter Haar GR, Cranston D. High intensity focused ultrasound: surgery of the future? Brit J Rad 76, 590-599 (2003).
30. Chaussy CG, Fuchs GJ. Current state and future developments of noninvasive treatment of human urinary stones with extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy, J Urol 141, 782-789 (1989).
31. Chaussy CG, Schmiedt E, Jocham D, et al. First clinical experience with extracorporeally induced destruction of kidney stones by shock waves, J Urol 167, 1957-1960 (1982).
32. Surtevant B. Shock wave physics of lithotripters, in Smith's Textbook of Endourology, Smith AD (Quality Medical Publishing, 2006).
33. Zhong P, Cioanta I, Cocks FH, Preminger GM. Inertial cavitation and associated acoustic emission produced during electrohydraulic shock wave lithotripsy, J Acoust Soc Amer 101, 2940-2950 (1997).
34. Crum L. Cavitation jets as a contributory mechanism for renal calculi disintegration in eswl, J Urol 140, 1587-1590 (1988).
35. Vogel A, Lauterborn W. Acoustic transient generation by laser-produced cavitation bubbles near solid boundaries, J Acoust Soc Amer 84, 719-731 (1988).
36. Zhu S, Cocks FH, Preminger GM, Zhong P. The role of stress waves and cavitation in stone comminution in shock wave lithotripsy, Ultrasound Med Biology 28, 661-671 (2002).
37. Evan AP, Willis LR, Lingeman JE, McAteer JA. Renal trauma and the risk of long-term complications in shock wave lithotripsy, Nephron 78, 1-8 (1998).
38. Howard D, Sturtevant B. In vitro study of the mechanical effects of shock-wave lithotripsy, Ultrasound Med Biology 23, 1107-1122 (1997).
39. Cleveland RO, Lifshitz D, Connors B, et al. In vivo pressure measurements of lithotripsy shock waves in pigs, Ultrasound Med Biology 24, 293-306 (1998).
40. Chen L, ter Haar G, and Hill CR. Influence of ablated tissue on the formation of high-intensity focused ultrasound lesions, Ultrasound Med Biology 22, 921-931 (1997).
41. Fry FJ, Sanghvi NT, Foster RS, Bihrle R, Hennige C. Ultrasound and microbubbles: their generation, detection and potential utilization in tissue and organ therapy - experimental, Ultrasound Med Biology 21, 1227-1237 (1995).
42. Bailey MR, Couret LN, Sapozhnikov OA, et al. Use of overpressure to assess the role of bubbles in focused ultrasound lesion shape in vitro, Ultrasound Med Biology 27, 695-708 (2001).
43. Hallaj IM, Cleveland RO. FDTD simulation of finite-amplitude pressure and temperature fields for biomedical ultrasound, J Acoust Soc Amer 105, L7-L12 (1999).
44. Trangenstein JA. Numerical Solution of Partial Differential Equations, (Cambridge University Press, in press).
45. Whitham GB. Linear and Nonlinear Waves (Wiley-Interscience Series of Texts, Monographs and Tracts, 1974).
46. Godunov SK. A finite difference method for the numerical computation of discontinuous solutions of the equations of fluid dynamics, Mat Sb 47, 357-393 (1959).
47. van Leer B. Towards the ultimate conservative difference scheme, vs. a second order sequel to Godunov's method, J Comp Phys 32, 101-136 (1979).
48. Engquist B, Majda A. Absorbing boundary conditions for numerical simulation of waves, Proc Natl Acad Sci 74, 1765-1766 (1977).
49. Herzfeld KF, Litovitz TA. Absorption and Dispersion of Ultrasonic Waves, (Academic Press, New York, 1959.)
50. Kinsler L, Frey A, Coppens A, Sanders J. Fundamentals of Acoustics. (John Wiley and Sons, 2000).
51. Frigo M, Johnson SG. The design and implementation of FFTW3, Proc IEEE 93, 216-231 (2005). (special issue on Program Generation, Optimization, and Platform Adaptation).
52. Blackford LS, Choi J, Cleary A, et al. ScaLAPACK Users' Guide, (Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics, Philadelphia, PA, 1997).
53. Cole RH, Underwater Explosions, (Princeton University Press, Princeton, 1948).
54. Zhou Y, Zhong P. The effect of reflector geometry on the acoustic field and bubble dynamics produced by and electrohydraulic shock wave lithotripter, J Acoust Soc Amer 119, 3625-3636 (2006).