Genotype x environment interaction for wheat yield in different drought stress conditions and agronomic traits suitable for selection

Australian Journal of Agricultural Research

Volumn 59, Issue 6, 2008, Pages 536-545

  Dodig, Dejan ^a   Zoric, Miroslav ^b   Knezevic, Desimir ^b   King, Stephen R ^c   Surlan Momirovic, Gordana ^b  

^a Maize Research Institute   (Serbia)

^b UNIVERSITY OF BELGRADE   (Serbia)

^c TEXAS A AND M UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Multivariate analysis; Yield stability

Indexed keywords

CLIMATE CHANGE; CLIMATE PREDICTION; DROUGHT STRESS; ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS; EXPERIMENTAL STUDY; GENOTYPE; MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS; SELECTION; WHEAT; YIELD RESPONSE;

EURASIA; EUROPE;

TRITICUM AESTIVUM;

EID: 44949186435     PISSN: 00049409     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1071/AR07281     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Blum A (1988) 'Plant breeding for stress environments.' (CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL)
2. Blum A(1996) Crop responses to drought and the interpretation of adaptation. Plant Growth Regulation 20, 135-148. doi: 10.1007/BF00024010
3. Borojevic S (1981) 'Principles and methods of plant breeding.' (Elsevier: Amsterdam)
4. Dodig D (2005) Evaluation of wheat genotypes for tolerance to drought. PhD Thesis, Belgrade University, Belgrade, Serbia [in Serbian].
5. Dragovic S, Stanojevic D, Aleksic V, Karagic Crossed D sign (1997) The intensity of drought in eastern Serbia and its effects on crop production. In 'Proceedings of International Symposium: Drought and Plant Production'. (Eds S Jevtic, S Pekic) pp. 71-81. (ARI Serbia: Belgrade)
6. Evans LT (1998) 'Feeding the ten billion: plants and population growth.' (Cambridge University Press: Cambridge)
7. Fischer RA, Maurer R (1978) Drought resistance in spring wheat cultivars: I. Grain yield responses. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 29, 897-912. doi: 10.1071/AR9780897
8. Gabriel KR (1971) The biplot - graphical display of matrices with applications to principal component analysis. Biometrika 58, 453-467. doi: 10.1093/biomet/58.3.453
9. Gauch HG (2006) Statistical analysis of yield trials by AMMI and GGE. Crop Science 46, 1488-1500. doi: 10.2135/cropsci2005.07-0193
10. Gauch HG, Zobel RW (1996) AMMI analysis of yield trials. In 'Genotype by environment interaction'. (Eds MS Kang, HG Gauch) pp. 85-122. (CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL)
11. Hohls T (2001) Conditions under which selection for mean productivity, tolerance to environmental stress, or stability should be used to improve yield across a range of contrasting environments. Euphytica 120, 235-245. doi: 10.1023/A:1017569415098
12. Islam TM, Sedgley RH (1981) Evidence for a 'uniculm effect' in spring wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) in a Mediterranean environment. Euphytica 30, 277-284. doi: 10.1007/BF00033988
13. Jackson P, Robertson M, Cooper M, Hammer G (1996) The role of physiological understanding in plant breeding: from a breeding perspective. Field Crops Research 49, 11-39. doi: 10.1016/S0378-4290(96)01012-X
14. Kang MS (1993) Simultaneous selection for yield and stability in crop performance trials: consequences for growers. Agronomy Journal 85, 754-757.
15. Ludlow MM, Muchow RC (1990) A critical evaluation of traits for improving crop yields in water-limited environments. Advances in Agronomy 43, 107-153.
16. Panthuwan G, Fokai S, Cooper M, Rajatasereekul S, O'Toole JC (2002) Yield response of rice genotypes to different types of drought under rainfed lowlands: I. Grain yield and yield components. Field Crops Research 41, 45-54.
17. Pheloung PC, Siddique KHM (1991) Contribution of stem dry matter to grain yield in wheat cultivars. Australian Journal of Plant Physiology 18, 53-64.
18. Quarrie SA, Stojanovic J, Pekic S (1999) Improving drought resistance in small grained cereals: a case study, progress and prospects. Plant Growth Regulation 29, 1-21. doi: 10.1023/A:1006210722659
19. Reynolds M, Calderini D, Condon A, Vargas M (2007) Association of source/sink traits with yield, biomass and radiation use efficiency among random sister lines from three wheat crosses in a high-yield environment. The Journal of Agricultural Science 145, 3-16. doi: 10.1017/ S0021859607006831
20. Rizza F, Badeckb FW, Cattivellia L, Lidestric O, Di Fonzoc N, Stanca AM (2004) Use of a water stress index to identify barley genotypes adapted to rainfed and irrigated conditions. Crop Science 44, 2127-2137.
21. Rosielle AA, Hamblin J (1981) Theoretical aspects of selection for yield in stress and non-stress enviroments. Crop Science 21, 943-946.
22. Saulescu NN, Ittu G, Balota M, Ittu M, Mustatea P (1998) Breeding wheat for lodging resistance, earliness and tolerance to abiotic stresses. In 'Wheat: prospects for global improvement'. (Eds HJ Braun et al.) pp. 181-188. (Kluwer Academic Publishers: Dordrecht, The Netherlands)
23. Sio-Se Mardeh A, Ahmadi A, Poustini K, Mohammadi V (2006) Evaluation of drought resistance indices under various environmental conditions. Field Crops Research 98, 222-229. doi: 10.1016/j.fcr.2006.02.001
24. Sudaric A, Simic D, Vrataric M (2006) Characterization of genotype by environment interactions in soybean breeding programmes of southeast Europe. Plant Breeding 125, 191-194. doi: 10.1111/j.1439-0523.2006.01185.x
25. van Eeuwijk FA (1995) Linear and bilinear models for the analysis of multi-environment trials: I. An inventory of models. Euphytica 84, 1-7. doi: 10.1007/BF01677551
26. van Ginkel M, Calhoun DS, Gebeyehu S, Miranda A, Tian-you C, Pargas Lara R, Trethowan RM, Sayre K, Crossa J, Rajaram S (1998) Plant traits related to yield of wheat in early, late, or continuous drought conditions. Euphytica 100, 109-121. doi: 10.1023/A:1018364208370
27. Vargas M, Crossa J, van Eeuwijk FA, Ramírez ME, Sayre K (1999) Using partial least squares regression, factorial regression, and AMMI models for interpreting genotype x environment interaction. Crop Science 39, 955-967.
28. Vermes L, Szemessy Á (Eds) (2000) 'Proceedings of the central and eastern European workshop on drought mitigation.' (RePRINT Studio Ltd.: Budapest, Hungary)
29. Waggoner PE (1993) Preparing for climate change. In 'International crop science I'. pp. 239-245. (Crop Science Society of America: Madison, WI)
30. Whan BR, Carlton GP, Anderson WK (1991) Potential for increasing early vigour and total biomass in spring wheat. I. Identification of genetic improvements. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 42, 347-361. doi: 10.1071/AR9910347
31. Wright GC, Rachaputi NC (2004) Drought and drought resistance. In 'Encyclopedia of plant and crop science'. (Ed. RM Goodman) pp. 386-390. (Marcel Dekker, Inc.: New York)
32. Yan W (2002) Singular value partition for biplot analysis of multi-environment trial data. Agronomy Journal 94, 990-996.
33. Zobel RW (1990) A powerful statistical model for understanding genotype by environment interaction. In 'Genotype by environment interaction and plant breeding'. (Ed. MS Kang) pp. 126-140. (Louisiana State University: Baton Rouge, FL)
34. Zobel RW, Wright MJ, Gauch HG (1988) Statistical analysis of a yield trial. Agronomy Journal 80, 388-393.