Long-term bladder management by intermittent catheterisation in adults and children

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Volumn , Issue 4, 2007, Pages

  Moore, Katherine N ^a   Fader, M ^b   Getliffe, K ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ALBERTA   (Canada)

^b NONE

Author keywords

Adult; Child; Equipment reuse; Female; Humans; Male; Patient dropouts; Urinary catheterization adverse effects; instrumentation; *methods ; Urinary retention *therapy ; Urinary tract infections etiology; *prevention control

Indexed keywords

ASYMPTOMATIC BACTERIURIA; BLADDER CATHETERIZATION; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; COST EFFECTIVENESS ANALYSIS; DISEASE COURSE; EPIDIDYMIS; FOLLOW UP; HEALTH CARE PERSONNEL; HEMATURIA; HUMAN; IMPAIRED BLADDER EMPTYING; INFECTION; LONG TERM CARE; ORCHITIS; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PATIENT ASSESSMENT; QUALITY OF LIFE; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; REVIEW; URETHRAL BLEEDING; URETHRITIS; URINARY TRACT INFECTION;

EID: 44949174012     PISSN: 1469493X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD006008.pub2     Document Type: Review

References (40)

1. Day 2003 {published data only} Day RA, Moore KN, Alberts MK. A pilot study comparing two methods of intermittent catheterization: Limitations and challenges. Urologic Nursing 2003;23(2):143-7,158.
2. De Ridder 2005 {published and unpublished data} De Ridder DJMK, Everaert K, Fernandez LG, Valero JVF, Duran AB, Abrisqueta MLJ, et al.Intermittent catheterisation with hydrophilic-coated catheters (Speedicath) reduces the risk of clinical urinary tract infection in spinal cord injured patients: a prospective randomzied parallel comparative trial. European Urology 2005;48(6):991-5.
3. Duffy 1995 {published data only} Duffy LM, Cleary J, Ahern S, Kuskowski MA, West M, Wheeler L, et al.Clean intermittent catheterization: Safe, Cost-effective bladder management for male residents of VA nursing homes. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society 1995;43(8):865-70. [MEDLINE: 1058].
4. Fera 2002 {published data only} Fera P. Lubricated urethral catheters with lidocaine versus gentamycin for clean intermittent catheterization. Brazilian Journal of Urology 2002;28(1):50-6. [MEDLINE: 18009].
5. Giannantoni 2001 {published data only} Giannantoni A, Di Stasi SM, Scivoletto G, Virgili G, Dolci S, Porena M. Intermittent catheterization with a prelubricated catheter in spinal cord injured patients: a prospective randomized crossover study. Journal of Urology 2001;166(1):130-3. [MEDLINE: 15635].
6. King 1992 {published data only} King RB, Carlson CE, Mervine J, Wu Y, Yarkony GM. Clean and sterile intermittent catheterization methods in hospitalized patients with spinal cord injury. Archives of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation 1992;73(9):798-802. [MEDLINE: 1360].
7. Moore 1993 {published data only} Moore KN, Kelm M, Sinclair O, Cadrain G. Bacteriuria in intermittent catheterization users: the effect of sterile versus clean reused catheters. Rehabilitation Nursing 1993;18(5):306-9. [MEDLINE: 1208].
8. Moore 2006 {published data only} *Moore KN, Burt J, Voaklander D. Clean versus sterile technique for intermittent catheterisation in rehablitiation. Clinical Rehabilitation 2006;20(6):461-8.
9. Pachler 1999 {published data only} Pachler J, Frimodt-Moller C. Pre-lubricated hydrophilic pvc urethral catheters compared to non-hydrophilic pvc catheters. Proceedings of the International Continence Society (ICS), 28th Annual Meeting; 1998 Sept 14-17; Jerusalem, Israel 1998:325. [MEDLINE: 5702].
10. *Pachler J, Frimodt-Moller C. A comparison of prelubricated hydrophilic and non-hydrophilic polyvinyl chloride catheters for urethral catheterization. BJU International 1999;83(7):767-9.
11. PrietoFingerhut 1999 {published data only} Prieto-Fingerhut T, Banovac K, Lynne CM. A study comparing sterile and nonsterile urethral catheterization in patients with spinal cord injury. Rehabilitation Nursing 1997;22(6):299-302. [MEDLINE: 5491].
12. Quigley 1993 {published data only} Quigley PA, Riggin OZ. A comparison of open and closed catheterization techniques in rehabilitation patients. Rehabilitation Nursing 1993;18:26-9,33. [MEDLINE: 2345].
13. Schlager 2001 {published data only} Schlager TA, Clark M, Anderson S. Effect of a single-use sterile catheter for each void on the frequency of bacteriuria in children with neurogenic bladder on intermittent catheterization for bladder emptying. Pediatrics 2001;198(4):e71.
14. Sutherland 1996 {published data only} Sutherland RS, Kogan BA, Baskin LS, Mevorach RA. Clean intermittent catheterization in boys using the LoFric catheter. Journal of Urology 1996;156(6):2041-3. [MEDLINE: 4867].
15. Vapnek 2003 {published data only} Vapnek JM, Maynard FM, Kim J. A prospective randomized trial of the LoFric hydrophilic coated catheter versus conventional plastic catheter for clean intermittent catheterization. Journal of Urology 2003;169(3):994-8. [MEDLINE: 15588].
16. Charbonneau 1993 Charbonneau-Smith R. No-touch catheterization and infection rates in a select spinal cord injured population. Rehabilitation Nursing 1993;18:296-9,305,355-6. [MEDLINE: 2282].
17. Diokno 1995 Diokno AC, Mitchell BA, Nash AJ, Kimbrough JA. Patient satisfaction and the LoFric catheter for clean intermittent catheterization. Journal of Urology 1995;153(2):349-51.
18. Fader 2001b Medical Devices Agency. Hydrophilic coated catheters for intermittent self-catheterisation:an evaluation. 2000; Vol. IN5.[MEDLINE: 9002].
19. Grigoleit 2006 Grigoleit U, Pannek J, Stohrer M. Not provided [Der Intermittierende einmalkatheterismus]. Urologe 2006;45(2):175- 182.
20. Hedlund Hedlund H, Hjelmas K, Jonsson O, Klarskov P, Talja M. Hydrophilic versus non-coated catheters for intermittent catheterization. Scandanavian Journal of Urology and Nephrology 2001;35:49-53.
21. Hudson 2005 Hudson E, Murahata RI. The 'no-touch' method of intermittent urinary catheter insertion: can it reduce the risk of bacteria entering the bladder?. Spina Cord 2005;43:611-4.
22. Kovindha 2004 Kovindha A, Mai W, Chiang N, Madersbacher H. Reused silicone catheter for clean intermittent catheterisation (CIC): is it safe for spinal-cord (SCI) injured men?. Spinal Cord 2004;42(11):638-642.
23. Lemke Lemke JR, Kasprowicz K, Worral PS. Intermittent catheterisation for patients with a neurogenic bladder: sterile versus clean. Journal of Nursing Care Quarterly 2005;20(4):302-6.
24. Normelli 1993 Normelli H, Aaro S, Hedlund R, Svensson O, Stromberg L. Urethral catheterization in spinal surgery: A randomized prospective study. EUR SPINE J 1993;2:132-5. [MEDLINE: 7142].
25. Pascoe 2001 Pascoe G, Clovis S. Evaluation of two coated catheters in intermittent self-catheterization. British Journal of Nursing 2001;10(5):325-9. [MEDLINE: 12088].
26. Pickard 1996 Pickard WG, Grundy DJ. A comparison of two methods of sterile urethral catheterisation in spinal cord injured adults. Paraplegia 1996;34(1):30-3. [MEDLINE: 2700].
27. Sherbondy 2002 Sherbondy AL, Cooper CS, Kalinowski SC, Boyt MA, Hawtrey CE. VAriability in catheter microwave sterilization techniques in a single clinic population. Journal of Urology 2002;168(2):562-4.
28. Sims 1993 Sims L, Ballard N. A comparison of two methods of catheter cleansing and storage used with clean intermittent catheterization. Rehabilitation Nursing Research 1993;2:87-92. [MEDLINE: 2279].
29. Stensballe 2005 Stensballe J, Looms D, Nielsen PN, Tvede M. Hydrophilic-coated catheters for intermittent catheterisation reduce urethral micro trauma: a prospective, randomised, participant-blinded, crossover study of three different types of catheters. European Urology 2005;48(6):978-83. [MEDLINE: 21523].
30. Terpenning 1989 Terpenning MS, Allada R, Kauffman CA. Intermittent catheterization in the elderly. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society 1989;37(5):411-6.
31. van Kuppevelt 2004 Koenen JH Van Kuppevelt D. Comparative randomised crossover evaluation of a modern catheter Speedicath with conventional catheters Lofric and Easicath. International Continence Society. Montreal Canada: ICS, 2005; Vol. Abstract 317.
32. van Kuppevelt HJM, Angenot E, van Asbeck FWA, Mulder GA, Nene AV, Pons C, et al.Comparative randomised cross-over evaluation of amodern catheter SpeediCath (trademark) with conventional catheters LoFric (trademark) and EasiCath (trademark) (Abstract). Proceedings of the 43rd Annual Meeting of the International Spinal Cord Society (ISCoS); 2004 Sept 26-29; Athens, Greece. 2004:Poster number 77.
33. Wu 1981 *Wu Y, Hamilton BB, Boyink MA, Nanninga JB. Reusable catheter for long-term sterile intermittent catheterization. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1981;62:39-42.
34. Cardenas 2006 Cardenas DD, Hoffman JM, Kelly E. Hydrophilic catheters for the prevention of UTI: a randomized controlled trial. Journal of Spinal Cord Medicine. 2006; Vol. 29, issue 3:300-1.
35. Coloplast A/S Coloplast Denmark. A comparison of hydrophilic coated catheter (Speedicath) with single use PVC catheter (Conveen) on the incidence of UTI in SCI adults. Study in progress 2006-2008.
36. Moore KN 2007 Incidence of UTI in children with spina bifida using clean reused PVC or sterile single use hydrophilic catheters. Ongoing study January 2007.
37. Eckstein 1982 Eckstein HB, Molyneux A. Intermittent catheterization of the bladder for neuropathic incontinence. Zeitschrift fur Kinderchirurgie 1982;37(4):143-4.
38. Fader 2007 Fader M, Cottenden AM, Getliffe K. Absorbent products for light urinary incontinence in women. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2007, Issue 2.Art. No.: CD001406. DOI:10.1002/14651858.CD001406. pub2.[MEDLINE: Art No.: CD001406. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD001406.pub2.].
39. NIDRR 1992 National Institute on Disability and Rehabilitation Research (NIDRR). The prevention and management of urinary tract infections among people with spinal cord injuries. National Institute on Disability and Rehabilitation Research Consensus Statement. January 27-29, 1992. Journal of the American Paraplegia Society 1992;15(3):194-204.
40. Wyndaele 2002 Wyndaele JJ. Complications of intermittent catheterization: their prevention and treatment. Spinal Cord 2002;40(10):536-41.