Effects of the 3M™ MEC Sprayable Pheromone® formulation on gypsy moth mating success

Journal of Applied Entomology

Volumn 132, Issue 6, 2008, Pages 461-468

  Onufrieva, K S ^a   Brewster, C C ^a   Thorpe, K W ^b   Sharov, A A ^c   Leonard, D S ^d   Reardon, R C ^d   Mastro, V C ^e   Sellers, P ^d   Roberts, E A ^a  

^a VIRGINIA POLYTECHNIC INSTITUTE AND STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH SERVICE   (United States)

^c NATIONAL INSTITUTE ON AGING   (United States)

^d U S DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE   (United States)

^e UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE   (United States)

Author keywords

Disparlure; Lymantria dispar; Mating disruption; Microcapsules; Pheromone; Plastic flakes

Indexed keywords

MATING DISRUPTION; MATING SUCCESS; MOTH; PHEROMONE TRAP; PLASTIC; SEX PHEROMONE; TRAPPING;

NORTH AMERICA; UNITED STATES; VIRGINIA;

LEPIDOPTERA; LYMANTRIA; LYMANTRIA DISPAR; LYMANTRIIDAE;

EID: 44949171616     PISSN: 09312048     EISSN: 14390418     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1439-0418.2007.01262.x     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. 3M™ MEC-GM Sprayable Pheromone®, 2004. Material Safety Data Sheet (MSDS), MSDS No. 1799394. 3M, Canada, London, ON.
2. Bierl BA, Beroza M, Collier CW, 1970. Potent sex attractant of the gypsy moth: its isolation, identification, and synthesis. Science 170, 87 89.
3. Campbell RW, 1981. Historical review. In: The gypsy moth: research toward integrated pest management. Ed. by Doane CC, McManus ML, USDA Tech. Bull. 1584, 65 86.
4. Cardé RT, Doane CC, Granett J, Roelofs WL, 1975. Disruption of pheromone communication in the gypsy moth and some behavioral effects of disparlure and an attractant modifier. Environ. Entomol. 4, 793 796.
5. Doane CC, 1968. Aspects of mating behavior of the gypsy moth. Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 61, 768 773.
6. Howse PE, Stevens IDR, Jones OT, 1998. Insect pheromones and their use in pest management. Chapman & Hall, London, New York.
7. Iwaki S, Marumo S, Saito T, Yamada M, Katagiri K, 1974. Synthesis and activity of optically active disparlure. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 96, 1842 1844.
8. Leonard DE, 1981. Bioecology of the gypsy moth. In: The gypsy moth: research towards integrated pest management. Ed. by Doane CC, McManus ML, USDA Tech. Bull. 1584, 9 29.
9. Leonard DS, 2004. Fact sheet. STS bulletin no. 2. [WWW document]. URL http://www.gmsts.org/operations/factsheets/ 002_Gypsy%20Moth%20Mating%20Disruption.pdf
10. Leonard DS, Sharov AA, 1995. Slow the Spread project update: developing a process for evaluation. In: Proceedings, USDA interagency gypsy moth research forum. Ed. by Fosbroke SLC, Gottschalk KW, USDA For. Serv. Gen. Tech. Rep. NE-213, 82 85
11. Leonhardt BA, Mastro VC, DeVilbiss ED, 1992. Evaluation of pheromone dispensers for use in gypsy moth detection (Lepidoptera: Lymantriidae). J. Entomol. Sci. 27, 280 284.
12. Leonhardt B, Mastro V, Leonard D, McLane W, Reardon R, Thorpe K, 1996. Control of low-density gypsy moth (Lepidoptera: Lymantriidae) populations by mating disruption with pheromone. J. Chem. Ecol. 2, 1255 1270.
13. McFadden MW, McManus ME, 1991. An insect out of control? The potential for spread and establishment of the gypsy moth in new forest areas in the United States. In: Forest insect guilds: patterns of interaction with host trees. Ed. by Baranchikov YN, Mattson WJ, Hain FP, Payne TL, USDA For. Serv. Gen. Tech. Rep. NE-153, 172 186.
14. Plimmer JR, Leonhardt BA, Webb RE, 1982. Management of the gypsy moth with its sex attractant pheromone. In: Insect pheromone technology: chemistry and application, Am. Chem. Soc. Symposium Series No. 190. Ed. by Leonhardt BA, Beroza M, Am. Chem. Soc., Washington, DC, 231 242.
15. SAS Institute, 2003. SAS/STAT® User's Guide, Version 9.1.3. SAS Institute, Cary, NC.
16. Schwalbe CP, 1981. Disparlure-baited traps for survey and detection. In: The gypsy moth: research towards integrated pest management. Ed. by Doane CC, McMannus ML, USDA Tech. Bull. 1584, 542 548.
17. Sharov AA, Liebhold AM, Ravlin FW, 1995. Prediction of gypsy moth (Lepidoptera: Lymantriidae) mating success from pheromone trap counts. Environ. Entomol. 24, 1239 1244.
18. Stark RS, Cameron EA, Richerson JV, 1974. Determination of mating fertility of female gypsy moths. J. Econ. Entomol. 67, 296 297.
19. Tcheslavskaia K, Brewster CC, Sharov AA, 2002. Mating success of gypsy moth (Lepidoptera: Lymantriidae) females in southern Wisconsin. Great Lakes Entomol. 35, 1 7.
20. Tcheslavskaia KS, Thorpe KW, Sharov AA, Leonard DS, Reardon RC, Mastro VC, Sellers P, Brewster CC, Roberts EA, 2005. Optimization of pheromone dosage for gypsy moth (Lepidoptera: Lymantriidae) mating disruption. Entomol. Exp. Appl. 115, 355 361.
21. Thorpe KW, Mastro VC, Leonard DS, Leonhardt BA, McLane W, Reardon RC, Talley SE, 1999. Comparative efficacy of two controlled-release gypsy moth mating disruption formulations. Entomol. Exp. Appl. 90, 267 277.
22. Thorpe KW, Leonard DS, Mastro VC, McLane W, Reardon RC, Sellers P, Webb RE, Talley SE, 2000. Effectiveness of gypsy moth mating disruption from aerial applications of plastic laminate flakes with and without a sticking agent. Agr. For. Entomol. 2, 225 231.
23. Thorpe K, Reardon R, Tcheslavskaia K, Leonard D, Mastro V, 2006. A review of the use of mating disruption to manage gypsy moth, Lymantria dispar (L.). USDA, For. Serv. FHTET-2006-13.
24. Webb RE, Leonhardt BA, Plimmer JR, Tatman KM, Boyd VK, Cohen DL, Schwalbe CP, Douglass LW, 1990. Effect of racemic disparlure released from grids of plastic ropes on mating success of gypsy moth (Lepidoptera: Lymantriidae) as influenced by dose and by population density. J. Econ. Entomol. 83, 910 916.
25. Zedi LT, Kydonieus AF, Quisumbing AR, 1982. Controlled release technologies. In: Insect suppression with controlled release Pheromone systems. Ed. by Kydonieus AF, Beroza M, CRC Press Inc., Boca Raton, FL, 131 144.