The politics of civic combinations

Voluntas

Volumn 19, Issue 2, 2008, Pages 140-160

  Bruszt, Laszlo ^a   Vedres, Balazs ^b  

^a EUROPEAN UNIVERSITY INSTITUTE   (Italy)

^b CENTRAL EUROPEAN UNIVERSITY   (Hungary)

Author keywords

Civic autonomy; Civic organizations; Civil society; Developmental partnerships; Hungary; Partnership projects; Political action

Indexed keywords

AUTONOMY; CIVIL SOCIETY; NONGOVERNMENTAL ORGANIZATION; POLITICAL DISCOURSE; POLITICAL PARTICIPATION; SOCIAL ORGANIZATION; STATE LED DEVELOPMENT;

CENTRAL EUROPE; EURASIA; EUROPE; HUNGARY;

EID: 44949158809     PISSN: 09578765     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11266-008-9060-1     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Anderson, K. (2000). The ottawa convention banning landmines, the role of international non-governmental organizations and the idea of international civil society. European Journal of International Law, 11 (1), 91-120.
2. Brown, L., Khagram, S., Moore, M, & Frumkin, P. (2001). Globalization, NGOs, and multi-sectoral relations. In J. S. Nye Jr. & J. D. Donohue (Eds.), Governance in a globalizing world (pp. 271-296). Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
3. Bruszt, L. (2002). Making markets and Eastern enlargement: Diverging convergence? In P. Mair & J. Zielonka (Eds.), The enlarged European Union: Diversity and adaptation (pp. 121-141). London, Portland: Frank Cass.
4. Bruszt, L., & Stark, D. (2003). Who counts? Supranational norms and societal needs. East European Politics and Societies, 17, 74-82.
5. Chandhoke, N. (2002). The limits of global civil society. In M. Glasius, M. Kaldor, & H. K. Anheier (Eds.). Global civil society yearbook 2002 (pp. 35-53). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
6. Evans, P. (1997). State - society synergy: Government and social capital in development. International and Area Studies, University of California at Berkeley.
7. Fraser, N. (1994). Rethinking the public sphere: A contribution to the critique of actually existing democracy. In C. Calhoun (Ed.), Habermas and the public sphere (pp. 109-142). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
8. Gerstenberg, O., & Sabel, C. F. (2002). Directly deliberative polyarchy: An institutional ideal for Europe? In C. Joerges & R. Dehousse (Eds.), Good governance in Europe's integrated market (pp. 289-341). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
9. Howell, J., & Pearce, J. (2002). Civil society and development: A critical exploration. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner.
10. Kaldor, M., Anheier, H. K., & Glasius, M. (2003). Global civil society yearbook 2003. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
11. Kettle, D. (2000). The global public management revolution: A report on the transformation of governance. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
12. OECD (1995). Participatory development and good governance. Paris: Development Cooperation Guidelines Series, Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development.
13. Perrow, C. (2001). The rise of nonprofits and the decline of civil society. In H. Anheier (Ed.), Organizational theory and nonprofit form. (Report no. 2) (pp. 33-44). Centre for Civil Society, London School of Economics.
14. Perrow, C. (2002). Organizing America: Wealth, power and the origins of American capitalism. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
15. Powell, W., & Clemens, E. (1998). Private action and the public good. New Haven, London: Yale University Press.
16. Sabel, C. (1993). Studied trust: Building new forms of cooperation in a volatile economy. Human Relations, 46 (9), 214-267.
17. Sabel, C. (1994). Learning by monitoring: The institutions of economic development. In N. Smelser & R. Swedberg (Eds.), Handbook of Economic Sociology (pp. 137-165). Princeton, NJ.: Princeton University Press and Russell Sage Foundation.
18. Sabel, C. (1996). Ireland: Local partnerships and social innovation. OECD Publications.
19. Sabel, C., & Cohen, J. (1997). Directly-deliberative polyarchy. European Law Journal, 3 (4), 313-342.
20. Schmitter, P. C., & Streeck, W. (1999). The organization of business interests: Studying the associative action of business in advanced industrial societies. Max Planck Institute fur Gesellschaftsforschung, Discussion Papers 99/1.
21. Stark, D., & Bruszt, L. (1998). Postsocialist pathways: Transforming politics and property in East Central Europe. New York, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
22. Streeck, W., & Schmitter, P. C. (1985). Community, market, state - and associations? The prospective contribution of interest governance to social order. In W. Streeck & P. C. Schmitter (Eds.), Private interest government. Beyond market and state (pp. 1-34). Sage: London.
23. Tarrow, S. (1998). Power in movement: Social movements and contentious politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
24. UNDP (1993). UNDP and organizations of civil society: Building sustainable partnerships. November, Mimeo.
25. UNDP (1995). Proposed UNDP Regional Programme: Civil society empowerment for poverty reduction in sub-Saharan Africa. January, Mimeo.
26. World Bank (1992). Governance and development. Washington, DC: World Bank.
27. World Bank (1996). The World Bank's partnership with nongovernmental organizations. Washington, DC.: World Bank.