Folksonomy and designing: An exploration

2007 Proceedings of the ASME International Design Engineering Technical Conferences and Computers and Information in Engineering Conference, DETC2007

Volumn 2 PART B, Issue , 2008, Pages 821-829

  Titus, Noel ^a   Subrahmanian, Eswaran ^b   Ramani, Karthik ^a  

^a PURDUE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b CARNEGIE MELLON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Design retrieval; Design reuse; Emergent behavior; Folksonomy; Ontology; Taxonomy

Indexed keywords

APPLIED (CO); BOTTOM-UP; DATA POINTS; DESIGN CONTEXT; DESIGN INFORMATION; DESIGN REPRESENTATIONS; DESIGN RESEARCH; DESIGN RETRIEVAL; DESIGN SCENARIO; DESIGN TAXONOMY; DESIGN TEAMS; INFORMATION OBJECTS; INTERNATIONAL DESIGNS; KEYWORDS (CO); KNOWLEDGE SHARING; RETRIEVAL (MIR); SIMILAR INTERESTS; SOCIAL ENVIRONMENT; TECHNICAL CONFERENCES; TOP DOWN METHODS;

ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN; COMPUTER NETWORKS; COMPUTERS; ENGINEERING; KNOWLEDGE REPRESENTATION; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; METADATA; ONTOLOGY; PAPER; TAXONOMIES; TECHNOLOGY;

PRODUCT DESIGN;

EID: 44949147929     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1115/DETC2007-35139     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (39)

1. Alexander, C., Ishikawa, S., Silverstein, M., Jacoson, M., et. al., A Pattern Language, Oxford University Press, 1977.
2. Brereton, M.F, Cannon, D.M., Mabogunje, A. and Leifer, L., "Collaboration in Design Teams: Mediating Design Progress through Social Interaction", Analysing Design Activity, (eds.) N.G. Cross, H.H.C.M. Christiaans and K. Dorst, 319-341, 1996.
3. Brooks, C. H., Montanez, N., An analysis of the effectiveness of tagging in blogs, AAAI Spring Symposium on Computational Approaches to Analyzing Weblogs, AAAI, March 2005.
4. Bucciarelli, L. L., Designing engineers, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 1994.
5. Butterfield, Stewart, Folksonomy: Social Classification, http://www.sylloge.com/personal/2004/08/folksono mysocial-classification-great. html, August 4, 2004
6. Cagan, J., Engineering Shape Grammars: Where We Have Been and Where We Are Going, Formal Engineering Design Synthesis, eds. Antonsson, E. K., Cagan, J., Cambridge University Press, 2001.
7. Clausing, D. P. Reusability in product development-keynote address. In Proceedings of Engineering Design Conference on Design Reuse, 1998
8. Del.icio.us: http://del.icio.us
9. Dias, W. P. S., Subrahmanian, E., Monarch, I. A., Dimensions of order in engineering design organizations, Design Studies, 24(4): 357-373, 2003.
10. Flickr: http://www.flickr.com
11. Gero, J.S. "Design Prototypes: a Knowledge Representation Schema for Design," AI Magazine, 11(4), 26-36, 1990.
12. Gero, J. S., Understanding Situated Design Computing and Constructive Memory: Newton, Mach, Einstein and Quantum Mechanics, Intelligent Computing in Engineering and Architecture, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 4200, 285-207, November, 2006.
13. Golder, S., Huberman, B., The structure of collaborative tagging systems, Journal of Information Science, 2006.
14. Gunn, T. 1982. The mechanization of design and manufacturing. Scientific American 247:114-130.
15. Hammond, T., Hannay, T., Lund, B., Scott, J., "Social Bookmarking Tools (I): A General Review" D-Lib Magazine, 11(4), April 2005.
16. Heymann, P., Garcia-Molina, H., Collaborative Creation of Communal Hierarchical Taxonomies in Social Tagging Systems, Technical Report InfoLab 2006-10, Department of Computer Science, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA, April 2006.
17. Hotho, A., Jaschke, A., Schmitz, C., Stumme, G., Information retrieval in folksonomies: Search and ranking., The Semantic Web: Research and Applications, (eds.) Sure, Y., Domingue, J., LNAI: 4011: 411-426, Heidelberg, June 2006.
18. Jayanti, J., Kalyanaraman, Y., Iyer, N., and Ramani, K. Developing An Engineering Shape Benchmark For Cad Models, Computer-Aided Design, 38(9): 939-953, September 2006.
19. Kitamura, Y., Sano, T., Namba, K., Mizoguchi, R., A Functional Concept Ontology and Its Application to Automatic Identification of Functional Structures, Advanced Engineering Informatics, 16, 145-163,2002.
20. Li Z., Ramani K., Ontology-based Design Information Extraction and Retrieval, Artificial Intelligence for Engineering Design, Analysis and Manufacturing, Special issue: Computational Linguistics for Design, Maintenance and Manufacturing, 20(2), 2007.
21. Mathes, A., Folksonomies - Cooperative Classification and Communication Through Shared Metadata. http://www. adammathes. com/academic/computer- mediatedcommunication/folksonomies.html, 2004.
22. Mika, P., Ontologies Are Us: A Unified Model of Social Networks and Semantics, ISWC, (eds) Gil, Y. et. al., Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 3729: 522-536, 2005.
23. Millen, D. R., Feinberg, J., Kerr, B. Dogear: Social Bookmarking in the Enterprise. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Montreal, Canada, CHI, 2006.
24. Monarch, I, Konda, S.L., Levy, S., Reich Y., Subrahmanian, E. and Ulrich, C., Mapping Sociotechnical Networks in the Making, Social Science, Technical Systems and Co-operative Work: Beyond the Great Divide, Bowker, G. Star, S. L., Turner, W., Gasser, L. (eds.), Lawrence Erlbaum, 1997.
25. Patil, L., Dutta, D., Sriram, R., "Ontology Formalization of Product Semantics for Product Lifecycle Management", Proc. ASME/IDETC & CIE Conference, Long Beach, CA, 2005.
26. Reddy, J. M., Finger, S., Konda, S., Subrahmanian, E. "Design as Building and Reusing Artifact Theories: Understanding and Supporting Growth of Design Knowledge." The Design Productivity Debate, Springer, 1998.
27. Salton, G., McGill, M. J., An Introduction to Modern Information Retrieval, McGraw-Hill, 1983.
28. Shirky, C., "Ontology Is Overrated: Categories, Links and Tags," 2005; Retrieved from http://www.shirky.com/writings/ ontology_overrated.html
29. Sim, S. K., Duffy, A. H. B., Towards on Ontology of Generic Engineering Design Activities, Research in Engineering Design, 14: 200-223, 2003.
30. Soininen, T., Tiihonen, J., Mannisto, T., Sulonen, R., Toward a general ontology of configuration, Artificial Intelligence for Engineering Design, Analysis and Manufacturing, 12:357-372, 1998.
31. Sosa, R., Gero, J. S., A Computational Framework for the Study of Creativity and Innovation in Design: Effects of Social Ties, Design Computing and Cognition, ed. Gero, J.S., 499-517, 2004
32. Subrahmanian, E., "Classification for communication and communication for classification in engineering design". Workshop on Classification Schemes in Cooperative Work at CSCW2000, eds. Schmidt, K., Simone, C., Star S. L., Philadelphia, 2000.
33. Subrahmanian E., Monarch I., Konda S., Granger H., Milliken R., Westerberg A., Boundary Objects and Prototypes at the Interfaces of Engineering Design, CSCW, 12(2):185-203(19), 2003.
34. S. Szykman, J. Senfaute, and R.D. Sriram, "Using XML to Describe Function and Taxonomies in Computer-Based Design," Proc. Am. Soc. Mechanical Engineers (ASME) Design Eng. Technical Conf.: 19th Computers and Information in Eng. Conf., ASME Press, New York, 1999.
35. Technorati: http://technorati.com/
36. Vander Wal, T., Understanding folksonomy: Tagging That Works, http://s3.amazonaws.com/2006presentations/dconstruct/Tagging_in_RW.pdf, September 2006.
37. Vander Wal, T., Folksonomy Coinage and Definition, http://vanderwal.net/ folksonomy.html, February 2, 2007.
38. Xu, Z., Fu, Y., Mao, J., Su, D., Xu, "Towards the Semantic Web: Collaborative Tag Suggestions" Workshop on Collaborative Web Tagging, WWW2006, May 22-26, 2006, Edinburgh, UK. Retrieved from: http://www.rawsugar.com/www2006/13.pdf.
39. Xue, D., Yang, H., A concurrent engineering-oriented design database representation model, Computer Aided Design, 36: pg. 947-965, 2004.