A proposed framework for the interpretation of biomonitoring data

Environmental Health: A Global Access Science Source

Volumn 7, Issue SUPPL. 1, 2008, Pages

  Boogaard, Peter J ^a   Money, Chris D ^b  

^a SHELL GLOBAL SOLUTIONS INTERNATIONAL B V   (United States)

^b EXXONMOBIL UPSTREAM RESEARCH COMPANY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BIOLOGICAL MARKER; CHEMICAL COMPOUND;

BIOCHEMISTRY; BIOLOGICAL MONITORING; CALIBRATION; CONFERENCE PAPER; ENVIRONMENTAL EXPOSURE; EPIDEMIOLOGICAL DATA; EVALUATION; HEALTH HAZARD; MEASUREMENT; PARAMETER; PUBLIC HEALTH; RISK ASSESSMENT; RISK MANAGEMENT; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; TOXICOKINETICS; ARTICLE; ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING; HUMAN;

ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING; HUMANS; RISK ASSESSMENT;

EID: 44949132814     PISSN: None     EISSN: 1476069X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/1476-069X-7-S1-S12     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (23)

1. Industrial Chemical Exposure - Guidelines for Biological Monitoring. L Lauwerys P Hoet, Boca Raton: CRC Press 3 2001 11237124
2. Personalized exposure assessment: promising approaches for human environmental health research. BK Weis, Environ Health Perspect 2005 113 7 840 8 16002370
3. Human Health Risk Assessment for Priority Substances. Canada H, 1994 http://www.hc-sc.gc.ca/ewh-semt/pubs/contaminants/approach/index_e.html
4. Technical Guidance Document on Risk assessment, Document 20418. EU, European Commission Joint Research Centre, Ispra: Ispra. 2003 http://ecb.jrc.it/Documents/TECHNICAL_GUIDANCE_DOCUMENT/EDITION_2/tgdpart1_2ed. pdf
5. Guidelines for Carcinogen risk assessment, Document EPA/630/P-03/001F. USEPA, 2005 http://cfpub.epa.gov/ncea/cfm/recordisplay.cfm?deid=116283
6. Principles for the assessment of risks to human health from exposure to chemicals, Environmental Health Criteria no. 210. IPCS, Geneva: WHO 1999 http://www.inchem.org/documents/ehc/ehc/ehc210.htm
7. (European Standard Committee on Oxidative Damage to DNA) Establishing the background level of base oxidation in human lymphocyte DNA: results of an interlaboratory validation study. ESCODD, FASEB J 2005 19 82 84 15533950
8. Exposure assessment at the workplace: implications of biological variability. P Manini G De Palma A Mutti, Toxicol Lett 2007 168 3 210 8 10.1016/j.toxlet.2006.09.014 17157456
9. The environment and disease: association or causation? A Bradford-Hill, Proceedings of the Royal Society of Medicine 1965 58 295 300 14283879
10. Causal thinking, biomarkers, and mechanisms of carcinogenesis. P Vineis M Porta, J Clin Epidemiol 1996 49 9 951 6 10.1016/0895-4356(96)00118-7 8780601
11. Global assessment of the state-of-the-science of endocrine disruptors. Document WHO/IPCS/EDC/02.2. IPCS, Geneva: WHO 2002
12. International Biomonitoring Workshop, co-sponsored by HESI, EPA, CDC, and ICCA. 21-22 September 2004, US EPA in Research Triangle Park, NC, USA. ILSI/HESI, 2004 http://www.hesiglobal.org/Events/biomonitoringworkshop.htm
13. Molecular dosimetry in rat urine of aflatoxin-N7-guanine and other aflatoxin metabolites by multiple monoclonal antibody affinity chromatography and immunoaffinity/high performance liquid chromatography. JD Groopman, Cancer Res 1992 52 2 267 74 1728400
14. Molecular dosimetry of urinary aflatoxin-DNA adducts in people living in Guangxi Autonomous Region, People's Republic of China. JD Groopman, Cancer Res 1992 52 1 45 52 1727385
15. A follow-up study of urinary markers of aflatoxin exposure and liver cancer risk in Shanghai, People's Republic of China. GS Qian, Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 1994 3 1 3 10 8118382
16. Urinary aflatoxin biomarkers and risk of hepatocellular carcinoma. RK Ross, Lancet 1992 339 8799 943 6 10.1016/0140-6736(92)91528-G 1348796
17. Chlorophyllin intervention reduces aflatoxin-DNA adducts in individuals at high risk for liver cancer. PA Egner, Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2001 98 25 14601 6 11724948 10.1073/pnas.251536898
18. Human biomonitoring system in the Czech Republic. M Cerna, Int J Hyg Environ Health 2007 210 3-4 495 9 10.1016/j.ijheh.2007.01.005 17296328
19. German Environmental Survey for Children (GerES IV) - first results. M Kolossa-Gehring, Int J Hyg Environ Health 2007 210 5 535 40 10.1016/j.ijheh. 2007.07.018 17870665
20. Lead exposure of children and newborns in Porto, Portugal. J Roma-Torres, Int J Hyg Environ Health 2007 210 3-4 411 4 10.1016/j.ijheh.2007.01.009 17321215
21. Approaches to the assessment of toxicity data with endpoints related to endocrine disruption. PW Harvey I Johnson, J Appl Toxicol 2002 22 4 241 7 10.1002/jat.854 12210541
22. Biomarkers and risk assessment: concepts and principles, Environmental Health Criteria No. 155. IPCS, Geneva: WHO 1993
23. Guidance for the Interpretation of Biomonitoring Data. PJ Boogaard PB Farmer LE Knudsen L Onyon SH Robison G Schoeters GD Stropp MF Wilks W Will M Holt, ECETOC Document No. 44 ECETOC: Brussels, Belgium 2005 1 71