Two-state model based on electron-transfer reactivity changes to quantify the noncovalent interaction between Co(NH3)5Cl 2+ and 18-crown-6 ether: The effect of second-sphere coordination on electron-transfer processes

Journal of Physical Chemistry A

Volumn 112, Issue 13, 2008, Pages 2813-2819

  Borreguero, M ^a   Prado Gotor, R ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SEVILLE   (Spain)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ELECTRON TRANSFER (ET); ELECTRON TRANSFER (ET) REACTIONS; NON COVALENT INTERACTIONS; REACTIVITY CHANGES; TWO STATE MODELS;

IRON;

18 CROWN 6; 18-CROWN-6; COBALT; CROWN ETHER; FERROCYANIDE; PENTAAMMINECHLOROCOBALT(III);

ARTICLE; CHEMICAL MODEL; CHEMISTRY; ELECTRON TRANSPORT; ENERGY TRANSFER; KINETICS;

COBALT; CROWN ETHERS; ELECTRON TRANSPORT; ENERGY TRANSFER; FERROCYANIDES; KINETICS; MODELS, CHEMICAL;

EID: 44949121917     PISSN: 10895639     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1021/jp7112544     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Julian, R. R.; Beauchamp J. L. Int. J. Mass. Spectrom. 2001, 210, 613.
2. Julian, R. R.; Beauchamp J. L. J. Am. Soc. Mass. Spectrom. 2002, 13, 493.
3. Lee, S.-W.; Lee, H.-N.; Kim. H. S.; Beauchamp, J. L. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1998, 120, 5800.
4. Ando, I.; Nishihara, K.; Ujimoto, K.; Kurihara, H. Inorg. Chim. Acta. 2003, 346, 19.
5. Ando, I. Coord. Chem. Rev. 2004, 248, 185.
6. (a) Muriel-Delgado, F.; Jiménez, R.; Gómez-Herrera, C.; Sánchez, F. Langmuir 1999, 15, 4334.
7. (b) Davies, K.; Hussam, A. Langmuir 1993, 9, 3270.
8. Hupp, J. T.; Weydent, J. Inorg. Chem. 1987, 26, 2647.
9. Dixon, N. E.; Jackson, W. G.; Lancaster, M. J.; Lawrance, G. A.; Sargeson, A. M. Inorg. Chem. 1981, 20, 470.
10. Malin, J. M.; Ryan, D. A.; O'Halloran, T. V. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1978, 700, 2097.
11. Brauer, G., Ed.; Handbook of Preparative Inorganic Chemistry, 2nd ed.; Academic Press: New York, 1965; Vol. 2, p 1511.
12. Juretic, R.; Paulovic, D.; Asperger, S. J. Chem. Soc, Dalton Trans. 1979, 2029.
13. Gastwick, D.; Haim, A. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1971, 93, 7347.
14. Roldán, E.; Domínguez, M.; Gonzalez, D. Comput. Chem. 1986, 10, 187.
15. In order to obtain eq 7 from eq 5 and 6 an additional hypothesis is necessary on the equilibrium distribution described by eq 5: the concentration of the partitioned substrate must be low enough in order to avoid saturation of the dispersed pseudophase. Indeed, even in this case, it is implicit that the presence of a substrate molecule in the dispersed pseudophase neither encourages nor discourages the union of a second molecule of substrate: in other words, binding of the substrate to the dispersed pseudophase is non-cooperative in character.
16. Villa, I.; Prado-Gotor, R. Chem. Phys. Lett. 2007, 434, 210.
17. Olson, A. R.; Simonson, J. R. J. Phys. Chem. 1949, 17, 1167.
18. Lopez-Cornejo, P.; Sánchez, F. J. Phys. Chem. B. 2001, 105, 10523.
19. Muriel, F.; Jiménez, R.; López, M.; Prado-Gotor, R.; Sánchez, F. Chem. Phys. 2004, 298, 317.
20. Norris, P. R.; Pratt, J. M. J. Chem. Soc., Dalton. Trans. 1995, 3643.