Whole-genome amplification by single-cell comparative genomic hybridization PCR (SCOMP)

Cold Spring Harbor Protocols

Volumn 3, Issue 1, 2008, Pages

  Arneson, Nona ^a   Hughes, Simon ^a   Houlston, Richard ^a   Done, Susan ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BUFFER; DNA FRAGMENT; GENOMIC DNA; PROTEIN MSE1; RESTRICTION ENDONUCLEASE;

AGAR GEL ELECTROPHORESIS; ARTICLE; CHEMICAL REACTION; CONTROLLED STUDY; DNA CLEAVAGE; DNA DETERMINATION; DNA FRAGMENTATION; DNA SEQUENCE; DNA STRUCTURE; ENZYME METABOLISM; GENE AMPLIFICATION; METHODOLOGY; MOLECULAR SIZE; POLYMERASE CHAIN REACTION; SINGLE CELL COMPARATIVE GENOMIC HYBRIDIZATION POLYMERASE CHAIN REACTION; WHOLE GENOME AMPLIFICATION;

EID: 44949109477     PISSN: None     EISSN: 15596095     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1101/pdb.prot4923     Document Type: Article

References (3)

1. Ghazani, A.A., Arneson, N.C., Warren, K., and Done, S.J. 2006. Limited tissue fixation times and whole genome amplification do not impact array CGH profiles. J. Clin. Pathol. 59: 311-315.
2. Klein, C.A., Schmidt-Kittler, O., Schardt, J.A., Pantel, K., Speicher, M.R., and Riethmüller, G. 1999. Comparative genomic hybridization, loss of heterozygosity, and DNA sequence analysis of single cells. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 96: 4494-4499.
3. Lucito, R., Nakimura, M., West, J.A., Han, Y., Chin, K., Jensen, K., McCombie, R., Gray, J.W., and Wigler, M. 1998. Genetic analysis using genomic representations. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 95: 4487-4492.