Occlusion indicators: A review

Journal of Indian Prosthodontist Society

Volumn 7, Issue 4, 2007, Pages 170-174

  Babu, Ramakrishna ^a   Nayar, Sanjna ^a,b  

^a Meenakshiammal Dental College   (India)

^b NONE   (India)

Author keywords

Occlusal interference; Qualitative indicators; Quantitative indicators; T Scan

Indexed keywords

EID: 44949108119     PISSN: 09724052     EISSN: 19984057     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.4103/0972-4052.41066     Document Type: Review

References (10)

1. Korioth TW. Number and location of occlusal contacts in intercuspal position J Proshet Dent 1990;64:206-10.
2. Millstein PL. A method to determine occlusal contact and noncontact areas: Preliminary report. J Proshet Dent 1984;52:106-10.
3. Agerberg G, Sandstrom R. Frequency of occlusal interferences: A clinical study in teenagers and young adults. J Prosthet Dent 1988;59:212-7.
4. Sarocoglu A. Ozpinar B. In vivo and in vitro evaluation of occlusal indicator sensitivity. J Prosthet Dent 2002;88:522-6.
5. Halperin GC, Halperin AR, Norling BK. Thickness, strength and plastic deformation of Occlusal registration strips. J Proshet Dent 1982;48:575-8.
6. Kerstein RB, Grundse K. Obtaining measurable bilateral simultaneous Occlusal contacts with computer analyzed and guided Occlusal adjustments. Quintessence Int 2001;32:7-8.
7. Carossa S, Lojacono A, Schierano G, Pera P. Evaluation of occlusal contacts in the dental laboratory: Influence of strip thickness and operator experience. Int J Prosthodont 2000;13:201-4.
8. Lyons MF, Sharkey SW, Lamey PJ. An evaluation of the T-Scan computerised occlusal analysis system. Int J Prosthodont 1992;5:166-72.
9. Millstein P, Maya A. An evaluation of occlusal contact marking indicators: A descriptive quantitative method. J Am Dent Assoc 2001;132:1280-6.
10. Delong R, Ko CC, Anderson GC, Hodges JS, Douglas WH. Comparing maximum intercuspal contacts of virtual dental patients and mounted dental casts. J Proshet Dent 2002;88:622-30.