|
Volumn 6917, Issue , 2008, Pages
|
How are false negative cases perceived by mammographers? Which abnormalities are misinterpreted and which go undetected?
|
Author keywords
Breast screening; Image perception; Mammographic feature; Observer performance evaluation; Perception; PERFORMS
|
Indexed keywords
BIOMINERALIZATION;
BLOCK CODES;
CALCIFICATION (BIOCHEMISTRY);
COMPUTER NETWORKS;
ERRORS;
GAIT ANALYSIS;
IMAGING TECHNIQUES;
MAMMOGRAPHY;
MEDICAL IMAGING;
MULTITASKING;
OBJECT RECOGNITION;
SCREENING;
TECHNOLOGICAL FORECASTING;
TECHNOLOGY;
ARCHITECTURAL DISTORTION (AD);
BREAST-SCREENING;
ERROR TYPES;
FALSE NEGATIVES;
FEATURE TYPES;
IMAGE PERCEPTION;
MAMMOGRAPHIC;
NON-DETECTION;
OBSERVER PERFORMANCES;
PERSONAL PERFORMANCE IN MAMMOGRAPHIC SCREENING (PERFORMS);
SELF-ASSESSMENT;
TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT (TA);
ERROR DETECTION;
|
EID: 44949103341
PISSN: 16057422
EISSN: None
Source Type: Conference Proceeding
DOI: 10.1117/12.771137 Document Type: Conference Paper |
Times cited : (6)
|
References (5)
|