Continuous opinions and discrete actions in opinion dynamics problems

International Journal of Modern Physics C

Volumn 19, Issue 4, 2008, Pages 617-624

  Martins, André C R ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SÃO PAULO   (Brazil)

Author keywords

Bayes rule; Opinion dynamics; Sznajd model; Voter model

Indexed keywords

EID: 44949097186     PISSN: 01291831     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1142/S0129183108012339     Document Type: Article

References (13)

1. C. Castellano, S. Fortunato and V. Loreto (2007), available at eprint arxiv:physics.soc-ph/0710.3256.
2. S. Galam, Y. Gefen and Y. Shapir, J. Math. Sociol. 9, 1 (1982).
3. S. Galam and S. Moscovici, Eur. J. Soc. Psychol. 21, 49 (1991).
4. P. Clifford and A. Sudbury, Biometrika 60, 581 (1973).
5. R. Holley and T. M. Liggett, Ann. Probab. 3, 643 (1975).
6. K. Sznajd-Weron and J. Sznajd, Int. J. Mod. Phys. C 11, 1157 (2000).
7. D. Stauffer, How to convince others? Monte Carlo simulations of the Sznajd model, in AIP Conf. Proc. 690, ed. J. E. Gubernatis (AIP, 2003), pp. 147-155.
8. K. Sznajd-Weron, Acta Phys. Pol. B. 36, 2537 (2005).
9. G. Deffuant, D. Neau, F. Amblard and G. Weisbuch, Adv. Compl. Sys. 3, 87 (2000).
10. R. Hegselmann and U. Krause, J. Artif. Soc. Soc. Simul. 5(3) (2002).
11. F. Schweitzer and J. A. Hołyst, Eur. Phys. J. B 15, 723 (2000).
12. G. Deffuant, F. Amblard, G. Weisbuch and T. Faure, J. Artif. Soci. Soc. Simul. 5(4) (2002).
13. S. Galam, Physica A 333, 453 (2004).