Effects of low intensity pulsed ultrasound with and without increased cortical porosity on structural bone allograft incorporation

Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research

Volumn 3, Issue 1, 2008, Pages

  Santoni, Brandon G ^a,b   Ehrhart, Nicole ^b   Turner, A Simon ^b   Wheeler, Donna L ^c  

^a Engineering Research Center and Hydraulics Laboratory   (United States)

^b Department of Environmental and Radiological Health Sciences   (United States)

^c BioSolutions Consulting   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 44949092269     PISSN: None     EISSN: 1749799X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/1749-799X-3-20     Document Type: Article

References (48)

1. Acceleration of tibial fracture-healing by non-invasive, low-intensity pulsed ultrasound. JD Heckman JP Ryaby J McCabe JJ Frey RF Kilcoyne, J Bone Joint Surg Am 1994 76(1) 26 34
2. Accelerated healing of distal radial fractures with the use of specific, low-intensity ultrasound. A multicenter, prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. TK Kristiansen JP Ryaby J McCabe JJ Frey LR Roe, J Bone Joint Surg Am 1997 79(7) 961 973
3. Complex tibial fracture outcomes following treatment with low-intensity pulsed ultrasound. KS Leung WS Lee HF Tsui PP Liu WH Cheung, Ultrasound Med Biol 2004 30(3) 389 395 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2003.11.008
4. Healing of nonunion of the medial malleolus by means of direct current: a case report. ZB Friedenberg MC Harlow CT Brighton, J Trauma 1971 11(10) 883 885
5. Treatment of nonunited scaphoid fractures by pulsed electromagnetic field and cast. GK Frykman J Taleisnik G Peters R Kaufman B Helal VE Wood RS Unsell, J Hand Surg [Am] 1986 11(3) 344 349
6. Current trends in the enhancement of biomaterial osteointegration: biophysical stimulation. M Fini G Giavaresi S Setti L Martini P Torricelli R Giardino, Int J Artif Organs 2004 27(8) 681 690
7. The clinical use of bone stimulators. J Anglen, J South Orthop Assoc 2003 12(2) 46 54
8. Mechanical strain, induced noninvasively in the high-frequency domain, is anabolic to cancellous bone, but not cortical bone. C Rubin AS Turner C Mallinckrodt C Jerome K McLeod S Bain, Bone 2002 30(3) 445 452 10.1016/S8756-3282(01)00689-5
9. Transmissibility of 15-hertz to 35-hertz vibrations to the human hip and lumbar spine: determining the physiologic feasibility of delivering low-level anabolic mechanical stimuli to skeletal regions at greatest risk of fracture because of osteoporosis. C Rubin M Pope JC Fritton M Magnusson T Hansson K McLeod SUNYSBSBNYUSA Department of Biomedical Engineering, Spine 2003 28(23) 2621 2627 10.1097/01.BRS.0000102682.61791.C9
10. Low-intensity pulsed ultrasound accelerates rat femoral fracture healing by acting on the various cellular reactions in the fracture callus. Y Azuma M Ito Y Harada H Takagi T Ohta S Jingushi, J Bone Miner Res 2001 16(4) 671 680 10.1359/jbmr.2001.16.4.671
11. Low-intensity transosseous ultrasound accelerates osteotomy healing in a sheep fracture model. ME Hantes AN Mavrodontidis CG Zalavras AH Karantanas T Karachalios KN Malizos, J Bone Joint Surg Am 2004 86-A 10 2275 2282 15466739
12. In vitro effects of low-intensity ultrasound stimulation on the bone cells. JS Sun RC Hong WH Chang LT Chen FH Lin HC Liu, J Biomed Mater Res 2001 57(3) 449 456 10.1002/1097-4636(20011205)57:3<449::AID-JBM1188>3.0.CO;2-0
13. Cytokine release from osteoblasts in response to ultrasound stimulation. JK Li WH Chang JC Lin RC Ruaan HC Liu JS Sun, Biomaterials 2003 24 13 2379 2385 10.1016/S0142-9612(03)00033-4 12699675
14. Early gene response to low-intensity pulsed ultrasound in rat osteoblastic cells. K Sena RM Leven K Mazhar DR Sumner AS Virdi, Ultrasound Med Biol 2005 31 5 703 708 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2005.01.013 15866420
15. Effect of low intensity pulsed ultrasound and BMP-2 on rat bone marrow stromal cell gene expression. EF Sant'Anna RM Leven AS Virdi DR Sumner, J Orthop Res 2005 23 3 646 652 10.1016/j.orthres.2004.09.007 15885487
16. Efficacy of low-intensity pulsed ultrasound in the prevention of osteoporosis following spinal cord injury. SJ Warden KL Bennell B Matthews DJ Brown JM McMeeken JD Wark, Bone 2001 29 5 431 436 10.1016/S8756-3282(01)00599-3 11704494
17. Lack of efficacy of low-intensity pulsed ultrasound on prevention of postmenopausal bone loss evaluated at the distal radius in older Chinese women. KS Leung WS Lee WH Cheung L Qin, Clin Orthop 2004 234 240 15552163
18. Allograft bone decreases in strength in vivo over time. DL Wheeler WF Enneking, Clin Orthop 2005 435 36 42 15930919
19. Allograft fractures revisited. JI Sorger FJ Hornicek M Zavatta JP Menzner MC Gebhardt WW Tomford HJ Mankin, Clin Orthop 2001 66 74 11154007
20. Factors affecting nonunion of the allograft-host junction. FJ Hornicek MC Gebhardt WW Tomford JI Sorger M Zavatta JP Menzner HJ Mankin, Clin Orthop 2001 382 87 98 10.1097/00003086-200101000-00014 11154010
21. The effect of recombinant human osteogenic protein-1 (bone morphogenetic protein-7) impregnation on allografts in a canine intercalary bone defect. DM Cullinane SA Lietman N Inoue LW Deitz EY Chao, J Orthop Res 2002 20 6 1240 1245 10.1016/S0736-0266(02)00056-6 12472235
22. Perforations of cortical bone allografts improve their incorporation. C Delloye P Simon C Nyssen-Behets X Banse F Bresler D Schmitt, Clin Orthop 2002 396 240 247 10.1097/00003086-200203000-00035 11859249
23. Radiological and histological analysis of cortical allografts: an experimental study in sheep femora. H Taira J Moreno P Ripalda F Forriol, Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 2004 124 5 320 325 10.1007/s00402-004-0653-x 15060834
24. Incorporation of perforated and demineralized cortical bone allografts. Part I: radiographic and histologic evaluation. KU Lewandrowski G Schollmeier A Ekkemkamp HK Uhthoff WW Tomford, Biomed Mater Eng 2001 11 3 197 207 11564903
25. Incorporation of perforated and demineralized cortical bone allografts. Part II: A mechanical and histologic evaluation. KU Lewandrowski G Schollmeier A Ekkemkamp HK Uhthoff WW Tomford, Biomed Mater Eng 2001 11 3 209 219 11564904
26. Mechanical properties of perforated and partially demineralized bone grafts. KU Lewandrowski L Bonassar HK Uhthoff, Clin Orthop 1998 353 238 246 10.1097/00003086-199808000-00028 9728180
27. Bone transplantation. DC Rees FS Haddad, Hospital medicine (London, England: 1998) 2003 64 4 205 209 12731131
28. A mechanical and computational investigation on the effects of conduit orientation on the strength of massive bone allografts. BG Santoni WJ Womack DL Wheeler CM Puttlitz, Bone 2007 41 5 769 774 10.1016/j.bone.2007.07.011 17765025
29. Mechanical environment affects allograft incorporation. J Benevenia M Zimmerman J Keating F Cyran M Blacksin JR Parsons, J Biomed Mater Res 2000 53 1 67 72 10.1002/(SICI)1097-4636(2000)53:1<67::AID-JBM9>3.0.CO;2-# 10634954
30. Bone histomorphometry: standardization of nomenclature, symbols, and units. Report of the ASBMR Histomorphometry Nomenclature Committee. AM Parfitt MK Drezner FH Glorieux JA Kanis H Malluche PJ Meunier SM Ott RR Recker, J Bone Miner Res 1987 2 6 595 610 3455637
31. Reconstruction of major segmental loss of the proximal femur in revision total hip arthroplasty. H Chandler J Clark S Murphy J McCarthy B Penenberg K Danylchuk B Roehr, Clin Orthop 1994 67 74 8118997
32. Proximal femoral allografts in revision hip arthroplasty. DG Allan GJ Lavoie S McDonald R Oakeshott AE Gross, J Bone Joint Surg Br 1991 73 2 235 240 2005146
33. The use of bone allografts for limb salvage in high-grade extremity osteosarcoma. MC Gebhardt DI Flugstad DS Springfield HJ Mankin, Clin Orthop 1991 270 181 196 1884538
34. Current status of allografting for bone tumors. HJ Mankin DS Springfield MC Gebhardt WW Tomford, Orthopedics 1992 15 10 1147 1154 1409125
35. Osteoarticular allografts to treat distal femoral osteonecrosis. JM Flynn DS Springfield HJ Mankin, Clin Orthop 1994 303 38 43 8194252
36. Allograft reconstruction after proximal tibial resection for bone tumors. An analysis of function and outcome comparing allograft and prosthetic reconstructions. EW Brien RM Terek JH Healey JM Lane, Clin Orthop 1994 303 116 127 8194221
37. Prosthetic and extremity survivorship after limb salvage for sarcoma. How long do the reconstructions last? SM Horowitz DB Glasser JM Lane JH Healey, Clin Orthop 1993 293 280 286 8339494
38. Retrieved human allografts: a clinicopathological study. WF Enneking DA Campanacci, J Bone Joint Surg Am 2001 83-A 7 971 986 11451965
39. The use of allografts to reconstruct intercalary defects of long bones. JT Makley, Clin Orthop 1985 197 58 75 3893832
40. The response to bone allografts. S Stevenson M Horowitz, J Bone Joint Surg Am 1992 74 6 939 950 1634586
41. The biology of bone graft repair. H Burchardt, Clin Orthop 1983 174 28 42 6339139
42. Improved osteoinduction of cortical bone allografts: a study of the effects of laser perforation and partial demineralization. KU Lewandrowski WW Tomford KT Schomacker TF Deutsch HJ Mankin, J Orthop Res 1997 15 5 748 756 10.1002/jor.1100150518 9420606
43. Quantification of growth factors in allogenic bone grafts extracted with three different methods. B Wildemann A Kadow-Romacker A Pruss NP Haas G Schmidmaier, Cell Tissue Bank 2007 8 2 107 114 10.1007/s10561-006-9021-0 17063261
44. The stimulation of bone growth by ultrasound. LR Duarte, Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 1983 101(3)
45. Non-invasive low-intensity pulsed ultrasound accelerates bone healing in the rabbit. AA Pilla MA Mont PR Nasser SA Khan M Figueiredo JJ Kaufman RS Siffert, J Orthop Trauma 1990 4(3) 246 253
46. Low intensity ultrasound treatment increases strength in a rat femoral fracture model. SJ Wang DG Lewallen ME Bolander EY Chao DM Ilstrup JF Greenleaf, J Orthop Res 1994 12(1) 40 47 10.1002/jor.1100120106
47. Effect of electromagnetic fields on patients undergoing massive bone graft following bone tumor resection. A double blind study. R Capanna D Donati C Masetti M Manfrini A Panozzo R Cadossi M Campanacci, Clin Orthop 1994 306 213 221 8070199
48. Cytokine release from osteoblasts in response to different intensities of pulsed electromagnetic field stimulation. JK Li JC Lin HC Liu WH Chang, Electromagn Biol Med 2007 26 3 153 165 17886003