Estimates of natural selection in a salmon population in captive and natural environments

Conservation Biology

Volumn 22, Issue 3, 2008, Pages 783-794

  Ford, Michael J ^a   Hard, Jeffrey J ^a   Boelts, Brant ^b   LaHood, Eric ^a   Miller, Jason ^a  

^a NORTHWEST FISHERIES SCIENCE CENTER   (United States)

^b WASHINGTON DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND WILDLIFE   (United States)

Author keywords

Artificial propagation; Captive breeding; Domestication selection; Hatchery; Oncorhynchus kisutch; Parentage analysis

Indexed keywords

CAPTIVE BREEDING; CAPTIVITY; DOMESTICATION; HATCHERY; MIGRATION; MORPHOLOGY; NATURAL SELECTION; PARENTAGE; RISK ASSESSMENT; SALMONID; SPECIES CONSERVATION; WEIGHT;

ANIMAL; AQUACULTURE; ARTICLE; BREEDING; ECOSYSTEM; ENVIRONMENT; FEMALE; GENETIC SELECTION; GENETICS; MALE; ONCORHYNCHUS KISUTCH; RIVER;

ANIMALS; AQUACULTURE; BREEDING; ECOSYSTEM; ENVIRONMENT; FEMALE; MALE; ONCORHYNCHUS KISUTCH; RIVERS; SELECTION (GENETICS);

ONCORHYNCHUS KISUTCH;

EID: 44949084508     PISSN: 08888892     EISSN: 15231739     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2008.00965.x     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. Araki, H., W. Ardren, E. Olsen, B. Cooper, and M. Blouin. 2007a. Reproductive success of captive-bred steelhead trout in the wild: evaluation of three hatchery programs in the Hood River. Conservation Biology 21 : 181 190.
2. Araki, H., B. Cooper, and M. S. Blouin. 2007b. Genetic effects of captive breeding cause a rapid, cumulative fitness decline in the wild. Science 318 : 100 103.
3. Beamish, R. J., C. Mahnken, and C. M. Neville. 1997. Hatchery and wild production of Pacific salmon in relation to large-scale, natural shifts in the productivity of the marine environment. ICES Journal of Marine Science 54 : 963 964.
4. Bryant, E., and D. Reed. 1999. Fitness decline under relaxed selection in captive populations. Conservation Biology 13 : 665 669.
5. Conway, W. G. 1980. An overview of captive propagation. Pages 199 208 in M. E. Soulé and B. A. Wilcox, editors. Conservation biology: an evolutionary-ecological perspective. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, Massachusetts.
6. Dickerson, B., K. Brinck, M. Willson, P. Bentzen, and T. Quinn. 2005. Relative importance of salmon body size and arrival time at breeding grounds to reproductive success. Ecology 86 : 347 353.
7. Etterson, J., and R. Shaw. 2001. Constraint to adaptive evolution in response to global warming. Science 294 : 151 154.
8. Fleming, I. A., and M. R. Gross. 1989. Evolution of adult female life history and morphology in a Pacific salmon (coho: Oncorhynchus kisutch). Evolution 43 : 141 157.
9. Fleming, I. A., and M. R. Gross. 1993. Breeding success of hatchery and wild coho salmon (Oncorhynchus kisutch) in competition. Ecological Applications 3 : 230 245.
10. Fleming, I. A., and M. R. Gross. 1994. Breeding competition in a Pacific Salmon (coho: Oncorhynchus kisutch): measures of natural and sexual selection. Evolution 48 : 637 657.
11. Ford, M., H. Fuss, B. Boelts, E. LaHood, J. Hard, and J. Miller. 2006. Changes in run timing and natural smolt production in a naturally spawning coho salmon (Oncorhynchus kisutch) population after 60 years of intensive hatchery supplementation. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 63 : 2343 2355.
12. Ford, M. J. 2002. Selection in captivity during supportive breeding may reduce fitness in the wild. Conservation Biology 16 : 815 825.
13. Frankham, R. H., H O. Ryder, E. Cothran, M. Soulé, N. Murray, and M. Snyder. 1986. Selection in captive populations. Zoo Biology 5 : 127 138.
14. Garant, D., J. J. Dodson, and L. Bernatchez. 2001. A genetic evaluation of mating system and determinants of individual reproductive success in Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar L.). The Journal of Heredity 92 : 137 145.
15. Gerber, S., P. Chabrier, and A. Kremer. 2003. FaMoz: a software for parentage analysis using dominant, codominant and uniparentally inherited markers. Molecular Ecology Notes 3 : 479 481.
16. Gross, M. R. 1985. Disruptive selection for alternative life histories in salmon. Nature 313 : 47 48.
17. Hershberger, W., J. Myers, R. Iwamoto, W. Mcauley, and A. Saxton. 1990. Genetic changes in the growth of coho salmon (Oncorhynchus kisutch) in marine net-pens, produced by 10 years of selection. Aquaculture 85 : 187 197.
18. Lande, R., and S. J. Arnold. 1983. The measurement of selection on correlated characters. Evolution 37 : 1210 1226.
19. Lande, R., and S. Shannon. 1996. The role of genetic variation in adaptation and population persistence in a changing environment. Evolution 50 : 434 437.
20. Lynch, M., and R. Lande. 1993. Evolution and extinction in response to environmental change. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, Massachusetts.
21. Lynch, M., and H. O'Hely. 2001. Captive breeding and the genetic fitness of natural populations. Conservation Genetics 2 : 363 378.
22. Marchetti, M., and G. Nevitt. 2003. Effects of hatchery rearing on brain structures of rainbow trout, Oncorhynchus mykiss. Environmental Biology of Fishes 66 : 9 14.
23. Mobrand, L. E., J. Barr, L. Blankenship, D. E. Campton, T. T. P. Evelyn, T. A. Flagg, C. V. W. Mahnken, L. W. Seeb, P. R. Seidel, and W. W. Smoker. 2005. Hatchery reform in Washington State: principles and emerging issues. Fisheries 30 : 11 33.
24. National Research Council. 1996. Upstream: salmon and society in the Pacific Northwest. National Academy Press, Washington, D.C.
25. Nehlsen, W., J. E. Williams, and J. A. Lichatowich. 1991. Pacific salmon at the crossroads: stocks at risk from California, Oregon, Idaho, and Washington. Fisheries 16 : 4 21.
26. Quinn, T. P., and G. B. Buck. 2001. Size- and sex-selective mortality of adult sockeye salmon: bears, gulls, and fish out of water. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 130 : 995 1005.
27. Quinn, T. P., and C. J. Foote. 1994. The effects of body size and sexual dimorphism on the reproductive behavior of sockeye salmon, Oncorhynchus nerka. Animal Behavior 48 : 751 761.
28. Quinn, T. P., A. P. Hendry, and G. B. Buck. 2001. Balancing natural and sexual selection in sockeye salmon: interactions between body size, reproductive opportunity and vulnerability to predation by bears. Evolutionary Ecology Research 3 : 917 937.
29. Reisenbichler, R. R., and J. D. McIntyre. 1977. Genetic differences in growth and survival of juvenile hatchery and wild steelhead trout, Salmo gairdneri. Journal of the Fisheries Research Board of Canada 34 : 123 128.
30. Rohlf, F. J. 2001. TPSDIG Program for digitizing images for analysis by thin plate splines. State University of New York, Stony Brook, New York. Available from http://life.bio.sunysb.edu/morph/ (accessed May, 2002).
31. Ryman, N., and L. Laikre. 1991. Effects of supportive breeding on the genetically effective population size. Conservation Biology 5 : 325 329.
32. Ryman, N., P. E. Jorde, and L. Laikre. 1995. Supportive breeding and variance effective population size. Conservation Biology 9 : 1619 1628.
33. Salo, E. O., and W. H. Bayliff. 1958. Artificial and natural production of silver salmon (Oncorhynchus kisutch) at Minter Creek, Washington. Washington Department of Fisheries, Olympia.
34. Sandercock, F. K. 1991. Life history of coho salmon (Oncorhynchus kisutch). Pages 395 446 in C. Groot and L. Margolis, editors. Pacific salmon life histories. University of British Columbia Press, Vancouver.
35. Snyder, N., S. Derrickson, S. Beissinger, J. Wiley, T. Smith, W. Toone, and B. Miller. 1996. Limitations of captive breeding in endangered species recovery. Conservation Biology 10 : 338 348.
36. Swain, D. P., and B. E. Riddell. 1990. Variation in agonistic behavior between newly emerged juveniles from hatchery and wild populations of coho salmon, Oncorhynchus kisutch. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 47 : 566 571.
37. Tufto, J. 2001. Effects of releasing maladapted individuals: a demographic-evolutionary model. The American Naturalist 158 : 331 340.
38. Van Den Berghe, E. P., and M. R. Gross. 1989. Natural selection resulting from female breeding competition in a Pacific salmon (coho: Oncorhynchus kisutch). Evolution 43 : 125 140.
39. Wang, J., and N. Ryman. 2001. Genetic effects of multiple generations of supportive breeding. Conservation Biology 16 : 1619 1631.
40. Waples, R. S., and J. Drake. 2004. Risk/benefit considerations for marine stock enhancement: a Pacific salmon perspective. Pages 260 306 in L. M. Leber, S. Kitada, T. Svasand, and H. L. Blankenship, editors. Proceedings of the second international symposium on marine stock enhancement. Blackwell Publishing, Oxford, United Kingdom.
41. Wessel, M., W. Smoker, R. Fagen, and J. Joyce. 2006. Variation of agonistic behavior among juvenile Chinook salmon (Oncorhynchus tshawytscha) of hatchery, hybrid, and wild origin. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 63 : 438 447.