Integrating genomics into clinical practice: Standards and regulatory challenges

Current Opinion in Molecular Therapeutics

Volumn 10, Issue 3, 2008, Pages 267-272

  Shabo, A ^a  

^a IBM HAIFA RESEARCH LAB   (Israel)

Author keywords

Clinical genomics; Data standards; Independent health record bank; Information network; Nationwide health reference information model

Indexed keywords

BIOMEDICINE; CLINICAL PRACTICE; GENOMICS; GENOTYPE PHENOTYPE CORRELATION; HEALTH CARE; HEALTH CARE POLICY; INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY; LAW; MEDICAL RECORD; REVIEW; UNITED STATES;

GENOMICS; HUMANS; MEDICINE;

EID: 44849136177     PISSN: 14648431     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Review

References (30)

1. Ruano G: Quo vadis personalized medicine? Personal Med (2004) 1(1):1-7.
2. Davis RL, Khoury MJ: The journey to personalized medicine. Personal Med (2005) 2(1):1-4.
3. Vazquez ES: Personalized therapy: An interdisciplinary challenge. Personal Med (2004) 1(1):127-130.
4. Dipple KM, McCabe ERB: Phenotypes of patients with "simple" mendelian disorders are complex traits: Thresholds, modifiers, and systems dynamics. Am J Hum Genet (2000) 66(6):1729-1735.
5. Christensen K, Murray JC: What genome-wide association studies can do for medicine. N Engl J Med (2007) 356(11):1094-1097.
6. Shabo A: The implications of electronic health records for personalized medicine. Personal Med (2005) 2(3):251-258.
7. Gold JD, Ball MJ: The health record banking imperative: A conceptual model. IBM Systems Journal (2007) 46(1):43-55.
8. Ball MJ, Smith C, Bakalar RS: Personal health records: Empowering consumers. J Healthcare Inf Manage (2007) 21(1):76-86. • A comprehensive description of all 'banking' strategies to maintain individual EHRs.
9. Heiler S: Semantic interoperability. ACM Computing Surveys (1995) 27(2):271-273.
10. Digital imaging and communications in medicine - standard specification. National Electrical Manufacturers Association, Rosslyn, VA, USA (2008). http://medical.nema.org/dicom.html
11. Health level seven. An ANSI-accredited standards developing organization: Health Level Seven Inc, Ann Arbor, MI, USA (2008). http://www.hl7.org
12. The European Committee for Standardization. The European Committee for Standardization, Brussels, Belgium (2008). http://www.cen.eu/cenorm/ homepage.htm
13. Hamby P, McLaughlin M: HIPAA standards offer more accuracy and eventual cost savings. Healthc Financ Manage (2001) 55(4):58-63.
14. International Standards Organization: International Standards Organization, Jersey City, NJ, USA (2008). http://www.iso.com/
15. Technical committee 215 on health information: International Standards Organization, Jersey City, NJ, USA (2008). http://isotc.iso.org/ livelink/livelink.exe?func=ll&objId=529137&objAction=browse&sort= name
16. Bioinformatic Sequence Markup Language (BSML): OASIS, Billerica, MA, USA (2001). http://xml.coverpages.org/bsml.html
17. MAGE-ML: Microarray and gene expression markup language: Microarray and Gene Expression Society, EBI, Cambridge, UK (2008). http://www.mged.org/Workgroups/MAGE/mage.html
18. OMIM - Online mendelian inheritance in man: Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA (2008). http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sites/ entrez?db=omim
19. Schadow G, Mead CN, Walker DM: The HL7 Reference Information Model under scrutiny. Stud Health Technol Inform (2006) 124:151-156. • A thorough description of the HL7 Reference Information Model from an ontological perspective.
20. S.3454 - Independent Health Record Banks Act of 2006 (Introduced in Senate): The Library of Congress - THOMAS, Washington, DC, USA (2006). http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/z?c109:S.3454: • The most significant advance in the legislation arena toward the banking paradigm regarding the sustainability of EHRs.
21. Yasnoff WA, Humphreys BL, Overhage JM, Detmer DE, Brennan PF, Morris RW, Middleton B, Bates DW, Fanning JP: A consensus action agenda for achieving the national health information infrastructure. J Am Med Inform Assoc (2004) 11(4):332-338. • A detailed description of the initial proposal for NHIN and RHIO architecture.
22. Genomics and Personalized Medicine Act of 2006 USA Congress, Washington, DC, USA (2006). http://frwebgate.access.gpo.gov/cgi-bin/getdoc. cgi?dbname=109cong_bills&docid=f:s3822is.txt.pdf
23. Healthcare information technology standards panel: American National Standards Committee, Washington, DC, USA (2008). http://www.ansi. org/standards_activities/standards_boards_panels/hisb/hitsp.aspx?menuid=3
24. Ferguson DF, Stockton ML: Service-oriented architecture: Programming model and product architecture. IBM Systems Journal (2005) 44(4):753-780.
25. Shabo A, Vortman P, Robson B: Who's afraid of lifetime electronic medical records? Towards Electronic Health Records Conference, London, UK (2001).
26. Shabo A: A global socio-economic-medico-legal model for the sustainability of longitudinal electronic health records: Part 1. Methods Inf Med (2006) 45(3):240-245.
27. Shabo A: A global socio-economic-medico-legal model for the sustainability of longitudinal electronic health records: Part 2. Methods Inf Med (2006) 45(5):498-505. • A detailed description of the IHRB's vision.
28. Shabo A: How can the emerging patient-centric health records lower costs in pharmacogenomics? Pharmacogenomics (2007) 8(5):507-511.
29. Gurwitz D, Lunshof JE, Altman RB: A call for the creation of personalized medicine databases. Nat Rev Drug Discov (2006) 5(1):23-26.
30. American health information community: 2006 Breakthrough focus areas: Department of Health and Human Services, Washington, DC, USA (2006). http://www.hhs.gov/healthit/community/breakthroughs/