Ventricular mass and electrocardiographic criteria of hypertrophy: Evaluation of new score;Massa ventricular e critérios eletrocardiográficos de hipertrofia: Avaliação de um novo escore

Arquivos Brasileiros de Cardiologia

Volumn 90, Issue 4, 2008, Pages

  Mazzaro, Cléber Do Lago ^a   Costa, Francisco De Assis ^a,b   Bombig, Maria Teresa Nogueira ^a   Luna Filho, Bráulio ^a   De Paola, Ângelo Amato Vincenzo ^a   Carvalho, Antonio Carlos De Camargo ^a   Da Costa, William ^a   Fonseca, Francisco Antonio Helfenstein ^a   Póvoa, Rui Manoel Dos Santos ^a  

^a FEDERAL UNIVERSITY OF SÃO PAULO   (Brazil)

^b NONE   (Brazil)

Author keywords

Echocardiography; Electrocardiography; Hypertrophy, left ventricular

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; BRAZIL; CARDIOVASCULAR RISK; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIAGNOSTIC VALUE; ELECTROCARDIOGRAPHY; EVALUATION; FEMALE; HEART LEFT VENTRICLE HYPERTROPHY; HEART LEFT VENTRICLE MASS; HUMAN; HYPERTENSION; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; OUTPATIENT CARE; QRS COMPLEX; SCORING SYSTEM; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

DATA INTERPRETATION, STATISTICAL; ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY; ELECTROCARDIOGRAPHY; FEMALE; HUMANS; HYPERTENSION; HYPERTROPHY, LEFT VENTRICULAR; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; OBESITY; ORGAN SIZE; REFERENCE VALUES; ROC CURVE; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

EID: 44849132716     PISSN: 0066782X     EISSN: 16784170     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1590/S0066-782X2008000400003     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Kannel WB, Gordon T, Offutt D. Left ventricular hypertrophy by electrocardiogram: prevalence, incidence, and mortality in the Framingham Study. Ann Intern Med. 1969;71:89-105.
2. Levy D, Garrison RJ, Savage DD, Kannel WB, Castelli WP. Prognostic implications of echocardiographically determined left ventricular mass in the Framinghan Heart Study. N Engl J Med. 1990;322:1561-6.
3. Okin PM, Devereux RB, Jern Sverker, Julius S, Kjeldsen SE, Dahlöf B. Relation of echocardiographic left ventricular mass and hypertrophy to persistent electrocardiographic left ventricular hypertrophy in hypertensive patients: The LIFE Study. Am J Hypertens. 2001;14:775-82.
4. Levy D, Salomon M, D'Agostino RB, Belanger AJ, Kannel WB. Prognostic implications of baseline electrocardiographic features and their serial changes in subjects with left ventricular hypertrophy. Circulation. 1994; 90:1786-93.
5. Casale PN, Devereux RB, Kligfield P, Eisenberg RR, Miller DH, Chaudhary BS, et al. Electrocardiographic detection of left ventricular hypertrophy: development and prospective validation of improved criteria. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1985; 6 (3): 572-80.
6. Alfakih K, Walters K, Jones T, Ridgway J, Hall AS, Sivannanthan M. New gender-specific partition values for ECG criteria of left ventricular hypertrophy: recalibration against cardiac MRI. Hypertension. 2004; 44: 175-79
7. Sociedade Brasileira de Cardiologia. IV Diretrizes Brasileiras de Hipertensão Arterial. Arq Bras Cardiol. 2004; 82 (supl 4):1-22.
8. Romhilt DW, Estes EH. A point-score system for the ECG diagnosis of left ventricular hypertrophy. Am Heart J. 1968; 75:752-58.
9. Sokolow M, Lyon TP. The ventricular complex in left ventricular hypertrophy as obtained by unipolar precordial and limb leads. Am Heart J. 1949; 37: 161-86.
10. Casalle PN, Devereux RB, Alonso DR, Campo E, Kligfield P. Improved sex-specific criteria of left ventricular hypertrophy for clinical and computer interpretation of electrocadiograms: validation with autopsy findings. Circulation. 1987; 75 (3): 565-72.
11. Okin PM, Roman MJ, Devereux RB, Kligfield P. Electrocardiographic identification of increased left ventricular mass by simple voltage-duration products. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1995; 25 (2): 417-23.
12. Schillaci G, Verdecchia P, Borgioni C, Ciucci A, Guerrieri M, Zampi I, et al. Improved electrocardiographic diagnosis of left ventricular hypertrophy. Am J Cardiol. 1994; 74:714-19.
13. Devereux RB, Alonso DR, Lutas EM, Gottlieb GJ, Campo E, Sachs I. Echocardiographic assesment of left ventricular hypertrophy: comparison to necropsy findings. Am J Cardiol. 1986; 57: 450-8.
14. Mattar JA. A simple calculation to estimate body surface area in adults and its correlation with Du Bois formula. Crit Care Med. 1989; 17(8):846-7.
15. Lang RM, Biering M, Devereux RB, Flachskampf FA, Foster E, Pellikka PA, et al. Recommendations for chamber quantification: a report from the American of Society Echocardiography's guidelines and standards committee and the chamber quantification writing group, developed in conjunction with the European Association of Echocardiography, a branch of the European Society of Cardiology. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2005; 18:1440-63.
16. Cohen J. A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales. Educ Psychol Meas. 1960; 20:37-46.
17. Levy D, Labib SB, Anderson KM, Christiansen JC, Kannel WB, Castelli WP. Determinants of sensitivity and specificity of electrocardiographic criteria for left ventricular hypertrophy. Circulation. 1990; 81:815-20.
18. Mazzoleni A, Wolff R, Wolff L, Reiner L. Correlation between component cardiac weights and electrocardiographic patterns in 185 cases. Circulation. 1964; 30: 808-29.
19. Verdecchia P, Carini G, Circo A, Dovellini E, Giovannini E, Lombardo M, et al. Left ventricular mass and cardiovascular morbidity in essential hypertension: the MAVI Study. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2001; 38: 1829-35.
20. Verdecchia P, Schillaci G, Borgioni C, Ciucci A, Gattobigio R, Zampi I, et al. Prognostic value of a new electrocardiographic method for diagnosis of left ventricular hypertrophy. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1998; 31: 383-90.