Effect of injection techniques on the rate of local adverse events in patients implanted with nonanimal hyaluronic acid gel dermal fillers

Dermatologic Surgery

Volumn 34, Issue SUPPL 1, 2008, Pages

  Glogau, Richard G ^a   Kane, Michael A C ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b EAR AND THROAT HOSPITAL   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

FILLER; HYALURONIC ACID;

ADULT; ADVERSE OUTCOME; ARTICLE; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; FACE SURGERY; FEMALE; FLOW RATE; HUMAN; INCIDENCE; INJECTION; INJECTION PAIN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MULTICENTER STUDY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; SKIN EDEMA;

BIOCOMPATIBLE MATERIALS; COSMETIC TECHNIQUES; ECCHYMOSIS; EDEMA; FACE; FEMALE; HUMANS; HYALURONIC ACID; INJECTIONS; LOGISTIC MODELS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PAIN; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; RISK FACTORS; SKIN;

EID: 44849118461     PISSN: 10760512     EISSN: 15244725     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1524-4725.2008.34251.x     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. Hamilton RG, Strobos J, Adkinson NF. Immunogenicity studies of cosmetically administered non-animal stabilized hyaluronic acid particles (accepted for publication), () Dermatol Surg 2007 33 : S176 85.
2. Piacquadio DJ, Larsen NE, Denlinger JL, et al. Hylan B gel (Hylaform) as a soft tissue augmentation material. In : Klein A, editor. Tissue augmentation in clinical practice: Procedures and techniques. New York : Marcel Dekker 1998. p. 269 91.
3. Olenius M. The first clinical study using a new biodegradable implant for the treatment of lips, wrinkles, and folds. Aesth Plast Surg 1998 22 : 97 101.
4. Duranti F, Salti G, Bovani B, et al. Injectable hyaluronic acid gel for soft tissue augmentation. A clinical and histological study. Dermatol Surg 1998 24 : 1317 25.
5. Friedman PM, Mafong EA, Kauvar AN, et al. Safety data of injectable nonanimal stabilized hyaluronic acid gel for soft tissue augmentation. Dermatol Surg 2002 28 : 491 4.
6. Lindqvist C, Tveten S, Bondevik BE, et al. A randomized, evaluator-blind, multicenter comparison of the efficacy and tolerability of Perlane versus Zyplast in the correction of nasolabial folds. Plast Reconstr Surg 2005 115 : 282 9.
7. Narins R. A randomized, double-blind, multicenter comparison of the efficacy and tolerability of Restylane versus Zyplast for the correction of nasolabial folds. Dermatol Surg 2003 29 : 588 95.
8. André P. Evaluation of the safety of a non-animal stabilized hyaluronic acid (NASHA, Q-Medical, Sweden) in European countries: a retrospective study from 1997 to 2001. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol 2004 18 : 422 5.
9. ® prescribing information. Scottsdale (AZ): Medicis Aesthetics Inc.
10. ® prescribing information Scottsdale (AZ): Medicis Aesthetics Inc.
11. Lowe NJ, Maxwell A, Lowe P, et al. Hyaluronic acid skin fillers: adverse reactions and skin testing. J Am Acad Dermatol 2001 45 : 930 3.
12. Monheit GD. Hylaform: a new hyaluronic acid filler. Facial Plast Surg 2004 20 : 153 5.
13. Monheit GD. Hyaluronic acid fillers: Hylaform and Captique. Facial Plast Surg Clin North Am 2007 15 : 77 84.
14. Carruthers A, Carey W, De Lorenzi C, et al. Randomized, double-blind comparison of the efficacy of two hyaluronic acid derivatives, Restylane Perlane and Hylaform, in the treatment of nasolabial folds. Dermatol Surg 2005 31 : 1591 8.
15. ™ Ultra prescribing information. Santa Barbara (CA): INAMED Aesthetics, 2006.