Special Section: Can There Be Such a Thing as Embodied Embedded Cognitive Neuroscience?

Theory & Psychology

Volumn 18, Issue 3, 2008, Pages 297-316

  Van Dijk, Jelle ^a   Kerkhofs, Roel ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF APPLIED SCIENCES UTRECHT   (Netherlands)

^b STATISTICS NETHERLANDS   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

brain behavior relationship; cognitive neuroscience; cognitivism; embedded cognition; embodied cognition; modularity

Indexed keywords

EID: 44849113816     PISSN: 09593543     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0959354308089787     Document Type: Article

References (51)

1. Agre, P.E. (1997). Computation and human experience. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
2. Bickhard, M.H., & Terveen, L. (1995). Foundational issues in artificial intelligence and cognitive science: Impasse and solutions. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
3. Brooks, R. (1999). Cambrian intelligence: The early history of the new AI. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
4. Cairns-Smith, A.G. (1996). Evolving the mind: On the nature of matter and the origin of consciousness. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
5. Chiel, H.J., & Beer, R.D. (1997). The brain has a body: Adaptive behavior emerges from interactions of nervous system, body and environment. Trends in Neurociences, 20, 553-557.
6. Christensen, W.D., & Hooker, C.A. (2004). Representation and the meaning of life. In H. Clapin, P. Slezak, & P. Staines (Eds.), Representation in mind: New approaches to mental representation. Oxford, UK: Elsevier Publishers.
7. Clancey, W.J. (1997). Situated cognition: On human knowledge and computer representation. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
8. Clark, A. (1997). Being there: Putting brain, body and world together again. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
9. Coltheart, M. (1999). Modularity and cognition. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 3, 115-120.
10. Coltheart, M. (2002). Cognitive neuropsychology. In H. Pashler & J. Wixted (Eds.), Stevens’ handbook of experimental psychology: Methodology in experimental psychology (pp. 139-174). New York: Wiley.
11. Cox, R.F.A., & Smitsman, A.W. (2008) Towards an embodiment of goals. Theory & Psychology, 18, 317-339.
12. Damasio, A.R. (1994). Descartes’ error: Emotion, reason, and the human brain. New York: Avon.
13. Damasio, A.R. (1999). The feeling of what happens: Body, emotion and the making of consciousness. London: Vintage.
14. Damasio, A.R. (2003). Looking for Spinoza: Joy, sorrow and the feeling brain. Orlando, FL: Harcourt.
15. Dunn, J., & Kirsner, K. (2003). What can be inferred from double dissociations? Cortex, 39, 1-7.
16. Edelman, G.M. (1992). Bright air, brilliant fire: On the matter of the mind. New York: Basic Books.
17. Edelman, G.M., & Tononi, G. (2000). A universe of consciousness: How matter becomes imagination. New York: Basic Books.
18. Edelman, S. (2006). Bridging language with the rest of cognition: Computational, algorithmic and neurobiological issues and methods. Proceedings of Ithaca EMCL workshop. Amsterdam /Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
19. Fodor, J. (1983). The modularity of mind. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
20. Fodor, J. (2000). The mind doesn't work that way: The scope and limits of computational psychology. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
21. Garavan, H., Ross, T.J., Murphy, K., Roche, R.A.P., & Stein, E.A. (2002). Dissociable executive functions in the dynamic control of behavior: Inhibition, error detection and correction. NeuroImage, 17, 1820-1829.
22. Hardcastle, V.G., & Stewart, C.M. (2002). What do brain data really show? Philosophy of Science, 69, 72-82.
23. Haselager, W.F.G. (1997). Cognitive science and folk psychology: The right frame of mind. London: SAGE.
24. Haselager, W.F.G., Bongers, R.M., & van Rooij, I. (2003). Cognitive science, representations and dynamical systems theory. In W. Tschacher & J-P. Dauwalder (Eds.), The dynamical systems approach to cognition (pp. 229-242). Singapore: World Scientific.
25. Hendriks-Jansen, H. (1996). Catching ourselves in the act: Situated activity, interactive emergence, evolution, and human thought. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
26. Hernandez-García, L., Wager, T., & Jonides, J. (2002). Functional brain imaging. In H. Pashler & J. Wixted (Eds.), Stevens’ handbook of experimental psychology: Methodology in experimental psychology (pp. 175-221). New York: Wiley.
27. Hutchins, E. (1995). Cognition in the wild. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
28. Juarrero, A. (1999). Dynamics in action: Intentional behavior as a complex system. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
29. Keijzer, F.A. (2001). Representation and behavior. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
30. Kelso, J.A.S. (1995). Dynamic patterns: The self-organization of brain and behavior. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
31. Kirsh, D. & Maglio, P. (1994). On distinguishing epistemic from pragmatic action. Cognitive Science, 18, 513-549.
32. Lakoff, G. (1987). Women, fire, and dangerous things. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
33. Langacker, R.W. (1987). Foundations of cognitive grammar: Theoretical prerequisites. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
34. Langacker, R.W. (1990). Concept, image, and symbol: The cognitive basis of grammar. Berlin, Germany: Mouton de Gruyter.
35. Nolfi, S., & Floreano, D. (2000). Evolutionary robotics: The biology, intelligence and technology of self-organizing machines. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
36. Norman, D.A. (2002). The design of everyday things. New York: Basic Books
37. Pfeifer, R., & Scheier, C. (1999). Understanding intelligence. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
38. Pinker, S. (1997). How the mind works. New York: Norton.
39. Port, R.F., & Van Gelder, T. (1995). Mind as motion: Explorations in the dynamics of cognition. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
40. Pulvermüller, F. (1999). Words in the brain's language. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 22, 253-336.
41. Pulvermüller, F., Hårle, M., & Hummel, F. (2001). Walking or talking? Behavioral and neurophysiological correlates of action verb processing. Brain and Language, 78, 143-168.
42. Pylyshyn, Z.W. (Ed.). (1987). The robot's dilemma: The frame problem in artificial intelligence. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
43. Thelen, E., & Smith, L.B. (1994). A dynamic systems approach to the development of cognition and action. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
44. Uttal, W.R. (2001). The new phrenology: The limits of localizing cognitive processes in the brain. Cambridge, MA: Bradford/MIT Press.
45. Van Orden, G.C., Pennington, B.F., & Stone, G.O. (2001). What do double dissociations prove? Cognitive Science, 25, 111-172.
46. van Rooij, I., Bongers, R.M., & Haselager, W.F.G. (2002). A non-representational approach to imagined action. Cognitive Science, 26, 345-375.
47. Varela, F.J., Thompson, E., & Rosch, E. (1991). The embodied mind. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
48. Veale, T., & O'Donoghue, D. (2000). Computation and blending. Journal of Cognitive Linguistics, 11, 253-281.
49. Veale, T. O'Donoghue, D., & Keane, M. (1999). Computability as a limiting cognitive constraint: Complexity concerns in metaphor comprehension about which cognitive linguists should be aware. In M. Hiraga, C. Sinha, & S. Wilcox (Eds.), Cultural, psychological and typological issues in cognitive linguistics (pp. 129-155). Amsterdam/ Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
50. Wheeler, M., & Clark, A. (1999). Genic representation: Reconciling content and causal complexity. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 50, 103-135.
51. Wiemer-Hastings, K., & Kurby, C.A. (2007). Selective adaptation effects on lexical access: Perceptual concept primitives? Manuscript in preparation.