Conjoint-HoQ: A quantitative methodology for consumer-driven design

2007 Proceedings of the ASME International Design Engineering Technical Conferences and Computers and Information in Engineering Conference, DETC2007

Volumn 6 PART A, Issue , 2008, Pages 207-217

  Olewnik, Andrew T ^a,b   Lewis, Kemper E ^a,b  

^a New York State Center for Engineering Design and Industrial Innovation (NYSCEDII)

^b the State University of New York

Author keywords

Conjoint analysis; Conjoint HoQ; Customer driven design; Decision based design; House of quality; Masscustomization; Quality function deployment (QFD)

Indexed keywords

CONJOINT ANALYSIS; DESIGN AUTOMATION CONFERENCE (DAC); DESIGN TOOLS; HAIR DRYER; HOUSE OF QUALITY (HOQ); INTERNATIONAL DESIGNS; MASS CUSTOMIZATION (MC); QUANTITATIVE METHODOLOGY; RESEARCH ISSUES; TECHNICAL CONFERENCES; TECHNICAL INFORMATIONS;

AUTOMATION; COMPUTER AIDED DESIGN; COMPUTER NETWORKS; COMPUTERS; ENGINEERING; INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING; MARKETING; MECHANIZATION; NUMERICAL METHODS; ROBOTICS; TECHNOLOGY;

ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN;

EID: 44849105187     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1115/DETC2007-35568     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (42)

1. Hauser, J. and Clausing, D., 1988, "The House of Quality," Harvard Business Review, 66, (3), pp. 63-74.
2. QFDI, 2005, "Abstracts from Symposia on QFD," http://www.qfdi.org/books/, February 2005.
3. Olewnik, A. and Lewis, K., 2006, "Limitations of the House of Quality to provide quantitative design information," International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management, to appear.
4. Olewnik, A. and Lewis, K., 2005, "On Validating Engineering Design Decision Support Tools," Journal of Concurrent Engineering Design Research and Applications, 13, (2), pp. 111-122.
5. Olewnik, A. and Lewis, K., 2005, "Development and Use of Design Method Validation Criteria," Decision Making in Engineering Design, W. Chen, L. Schmidt and K. Lewis eds., ASME Press.
6. Hazelrigg, G., 2003, "Validation of Engineering Design Alternative Selection Methods," Journal of Engineering Optimization, 35, (2), pp. 103-120.
7. Li, H. and Azarm, S., 2000, "Product Design Selection Under Uncertainty and with Competitive Advantage," Journal of Mechanical Design, 122, (4), pp. 411-418.
8. Wassenaar, H., Chen, W., Cheng, J. and Sudjianto, A., 2004, "An Integrated Latent Variable Choice Modeling Approach for Enhancing Product Demand Modeling," DETC 2004-57487, ASME Design Engineering Technical Conferences, Salt Lake City Utah.
9. Wassenaar, H.J. and Chen, W., 2003, "An Approach to Decision-Based Design With Discrete Choice Analysis for Demand Modeling," ASME Journal of Mechanical Design, 125, (3), pp. 490-497.
10. Bouchereau, V. and Rowlands, H., 2000, "Methods and Techniques to Help Quality Function Deployment (QFD)," Benchmarking: An International Journal, 7, (1), pp. 8-20.
11. Ramasamy, N.R. and Selladurai, V., 2004, "Fuzzy logic approach to prioritise engineering characteristics in quality function deployment (FL-QFD)," International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management, 21, (9), pp. 1012-1023.
12. Hoyle, C., Kumar, D.K.D. and Chen, W., 2006, "Product Attribute Function Deployment (PAFD) for Decision-Based Conceptual Design," DETC2006-99588, ASME Design Engineering and Technical Conferences, Philadelphia, PA.
13. Aungst, S., Barton, R. and Wilson, D., 2003, "The Virtual Integrated Design Method," Quality Engineering, 15, (4), pp. 565-579.
14. Zhu, L. and Kazmer, D., 2003, "An Evolving, Model-Based Quality Function Déployer," DETC2003/DFM-48136, ASME Design Engineering Technical Conferences, Chicago, IL.
15. Gilmore, J.H. and Pine, B.J. eds, 2000, Markets of One: Creating Customer-Unique Value Through Mass Customization, Harvard Business School Press, Boston, MA.
16. Breyfogle, F. W., 1999, Implementing Six Sigma: Smarter Solutions Using Statistical Methods, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York.
17. Hofmeister, K., 1995, "QFD in the Service Environment," Quality Up, Costs Down: A Manager's Guide to Taguchi Methods and QFD, W. Eureka and N. Ryan eds., ASI Press, New York, pp 57-78.
18. Dolan, R., 1990, "Conjoint Analysis: A Manager's Guide," Harvard Business School Cases, Harvard,
19. Bohl, P., 1997, "Cojoint Literature Database CLD," http://www.uni-mainz.de/~bohlp/cld.html,
20. Green, P.E. and Srinivasan, V., 1990, "Conjoint Analysis in Marketing: New Developments with Implications for Research and Practice," Journal of Marketing, 54, (4), pp. 3-19.
21. Louviere, JJ., Hensher, D.A. and Swait, J.D., 2000, Stated Choice Methods: Analysis and Application, Cambridge Universit Press., Cambridge, UK.
22. Green, P. and Srinivasan, V., 1978, "Conjoint Analysis in Consumer Research: Issue and Outlook," Journal of Consumer Research, 5, pp. 103-123.
23. Arrow, K., 1951, Social Choice and Individual Values, John Wiley & Sons, New York.
24. Grissom, M.D., Belegundu, A.D., Rangaswamy, A. and Kopmann, G.H., 2006, "Conjoint-analysis-based multiattribute optimization: application in acoustical design," Structural Multidiciplinary Optimization, 31, (1), pp. 8-16.
25. Michalek, J., Feinberg, F.M. and Papalambros, P.Y., 2005, "Linking Marketing and Engineering Product Design Decisions via Analytical Target Cascading," The Journal of Product Innovation Management, 22, (1), pp. 42-62.
26. Olewnik, A., Brauen, T., Ferguson, S. and Lewis, K., 2004, "A Framework for Flexible Systems and its Implementation in Multiattribute Decision Making," ASME Journal of Mechanical Design, 126, (3), pp. 412-419.
27. Aungst, S., Barton, R. and Wilson, D.T., 2002, "Integrating Marketing Models," ISBM Report 12-2002, Institute for the Study of Business Markets, Penn State University,
28. Masui, K., Sakao, T., Aizawa, S. and Inaba, A., 2002, "Quality Function Deployment for Environment (QFDE) to Support Design for Environment (DFE)," DETC2002/DFM-34199, ASME Design Engineering Technical Conferences & Computers and Information in Engineering Conference, Montreal, Canada.
29. Miller, G., 1956, "The Magical Number Seven, Plus or Minus Two: Some limits on our capacity for processing information," The Psychological Review, 63, (2), pp. 81-97.
30. Mazzotta, M.J. and Opaluch, JJ., 1995, "Decision Making When Choices are Complex: A Test of Heiner's Hypothesis," Land Economics, 71, (4), pp. 500-515.
31. Lee, J. and Geistfeld, L.V., 1998, "Enhancing Consumer Choice: Are We Making Appropriate Recommendations?" The Journal of Consumer Affairs, 32, (2), pp. 227-251.
32. Simon, H.A., 1997, Models of Bounded Rationality, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
33. Crow, K. and Associates, D., 2005, "Example House of Quality: Refrigerator," http://www.isixsigma.com/, May 2005.
34. Eureka, W. and Ryan, N. eds, 1995, Quality Up, Costs Down: A Manager's Guide to Taguchi Methods and QFD, ASI Press, Burr Ridge, IL.
35. Lowe, AJ., 2000, "Example House of Quality: Product -Rock Climbing Harness," http://www.isixsigma.com/, June 2004.
36. Box, G.E.P. and Draper, N.R., 1987, Empirical ModelBuilding and Response Surfaces, John Wiley & Sons, New York.
37. Keeney, R.L., 1992, "On the Foundations of Prescriptive Decision Analysis," Utility Theories: Measurements and Applications, W. Edwards eds., Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston, MA, pp 57-72.
38. Thurston, D., 1991, "A Formal Method for Subjective Design Evaluation with Multiple Attributes," Research in Engineering Design, 3, (2), pp. 105-122.
39. Thurston, D., 2001, "Real and Misconceived Limitations to Decision Based Design with Utility Analysis," Journal of Mechanical Design, 123, (2), pp. 176-183.
40. Taguchi, G., 1986, Introduction to Quality Engineering, Asian Productivity Organization (distributed by American Supplier Institute, Inc.), Dearborn, MI.
41. Olewnik, A., 2005, "Validating Design-Decision Support Models," PhD Dissertation, University at Buffalo-SUNY
42. See, T.-K., Gurnani, A. and Lewis, K., 2004, "Multi-Attribute Decision Making Using Hypothetical Equvalents and Inequivalents," Journal of Mechanical Design, 126, (6), pp. 950-958.