MDCT of the breast

American Journal of Roentgenology

Volumn 190, Issue 6, 2008, Pages 1644-1651

  Perrone, Anna ^a   Mele, Luigi Lo ^a   Sassi, Simona ^a   Marini, Marina ^a   Testaverde, Lorenzo ^a   Izzo, Luciano ^a   Marini, Mario ^a  

^a SAPIENZA UNIVERSITY OF ROME   (Italy)

Author keywords

Breast cancer; Enhancement effects; MDCT; Morphologic features

Indexed keywords

IOMEPROL;

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BREAST; BREAST CARCINOMA; BREAST FIBROADENOMA; BREAST SURGERY; BREAST TUMOR; CLINICAL ARTICLE; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; ECHOGRAPHY; FEMALE; FIBROCYSTIC BREAST DISEASE; HISTOPATHOLOGY; HUMAN; MAMMOGRAPHY; MULTIDETECTOR COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

ADULT; AGED; BREAST NEOPLASMS; FEMALE; HUMANS; MAMMOGRAPHY; MIDDLE AGED; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; TOMOGRAPHY, X-RAY COMPUTED;

EID: 44849101421     PISSN: 0361803X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2214/AJR.07.3145     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Del Maschio A, Bazzocchi M, Giuseppetti GM, et al. Breast MRI: report on a multicentric national trial by the Study Section of Magnetic Resonance and Breast Imaging. Radiol Med 2002; 104:262-272
2. Orel SG, Schnall MD. MR imaging of the breast for the detection, diagnosis, and staging of breast cancer. Radiology 2001; 220:13-30
3. Rankin SC. MRI of the breast. Br J Radiol 2000; 73:806-818
4. Levine EA, Freimanis RI, Perrier ND, et al. Positron emission mammography: initial clinical results. Ann Surg Oncol 2203; 10:86-91
5. Uematsu T, Sano M, Homma K, et al. Three-dimensional helical CT of the breast: accuracy for measuring extent of breast cancer candidates for breast conserving surgery. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2001; 65:249-257
6. Uematsu T, Sano M, Homma K, et al. Comparison between high resolution helical CT and pathology in breast examination. Acta Radiol 2002; 43:385-390
7. Akashi-Tanaka S, Fukutomi T, Miyakawa K, et al. Contrast-enhanced computed tomography for diagnosing the intraductal component and small invasive foci of breast cancer. Breast Cancer 2001; 8:10-15
8. Ueda T, Takano H, Suzuki M, et al. Dynamic helical CT-guided needle localization of non-palpable and mammographically occult breast lesions. Acta Radiol 2001; 42:383-385
9. Slanetz PJ, Jain R, Kline JL, et al. CT-guided preoperative needle localization of MR imaging-detected mammographically occult lesions. AJR 1999; 172:160-162
10. Muller JW, van Waes PF, Koehler PR. Computed tomography of breast lesions: comparison with X-ray mammography. J Comput Assist Tomogr 1983; 7:650-654
11. Nakahara H, Namba K, Watanabe R, et al. Extension of breast cancer: comparison of CT and MRI. Radiat Med 2002; 20:17-23
12. Takase K, Furuta A, Harada N, et al. Assessing the extent of breast cancer using multidetector row helical computed tomography. J Comput Assist Tomogr 2006; 30:479-485
13. Doihara H, Fujita T, Takabatake D, et al. Clinical significance of multidetector-row computed tomography in breast surgery. Breast J 2006; 12[5 suppl 2]:S204-S209
14. Fujita T, Doihara H, Takabatake D, et al. Multidetector-row computed tomography for diagnosing intraductal extension of breast carcinoma. J Surg Oncol 2005; 91:10-16
15. Evans SH, Davis R, Cooke J, et al. A comparison of radiation doses to the breast in computed tomographic chest examination for two scanning protocols. Clin Radiol 1989; 140:45-46
16. Seo BK, Pisano ED, Cho KR, et al. Low dose multidetector dynamic CT in the breast: preliminary study. J Clin Imaging 2005; 29:172-178
17. Hiramatsu H, Enomoto K, Ikeda T. Three-dimensional helical CT for treatment planning of breast cancer. Radiat Med 1999; 17:35-40
18. Mendel JB, Long M, Slanetz PJ. CT-guided core needle biopsy of breast lesions visible only on MRI. AJR 2007; 189:152-154
19. Miyake K, Hayakawa K, Nishino M, et al. Benign or malignant? Differentiating breast lesions with computed tomography attenuation values on dynamic computed tomography mammography. J Comput Assist Tomogr 2005; 29:772-779
20. Inoue M, Sano T, Watai R, et al. Dynamic multi-detector CT of breast tumors: diagnostic features and comparison with conventional techniques. AJR 2003; 181:679-686
21. Kuhl CK, Schild HH. Dynamic image interpretation of MRI of the breast. J Magn Reson Imaging 2000; 12:965-974
22. Del Maschio A, De Gaspari A, Panizza P. Magnetic resonance in breast imaging. Radiol Med (Torino) 2002; 104:253-261
23. Gilles R, Zafrani B, Guinebretiere JM, et al. Ductal carcinoma in situ: MR imaging-histopathologic correlation. Radiology 1995; 196:415-419
24. Orel SG, Mendonca MH, Reynolds C, et al. MR imaging of ductal carcinoma in situ. Radiology 1998; 207:675-681
25. Teifke A, Schweden F, Cagil H, et al. Spiral computerized tomography of the breast. Rofo 1994; 161:495-500
26. Sardanelli F, Rescinito G, Giordano GD, et al. MR dynamic enhancement of breast lesion: high temporal resolution during the first-minute versus eight-minute study. J Comput Assist Tomogr 2000; 24:724-731
27. Sardanelli F, Calabrese M, Zandrino F, et al. Dynamic helical CT of breast tumors. J Comput Assist Tomogr 1998; 22:398-407