Criteria for identification and assessment of agro-biodiversity heritage sites: Evolving sustainable agriculture

Current Science

Volumn 94, Issue 9, 2008, Pages 1131-1138

  Singh, Anurudh K ^a   Varaprasad, K S ^a  

^a NATIONAL BUREAU OF PLANT GENETIC RESOURCES   (India)

Author keywords

Agro biodiversity; Economics aspect; Heritage sites; Social aspect; Value assessment

Indexed keywords

EID: 44849096503     PISSN: 00113891     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Review

References (7)

1. The Biological Diversity Act, 2002 and Biological Diversity Rules 2004, National Biodiversity Authority, Chennai, 2004, p. 57.
2. The Protection of Plant Varieties and Farmers' Right Act 2001, Ministry of Agriculture, Government of India, 2007, p. 127.
3. Hynes, R. A. and Chase, A. K., Plants, sites and domiculture: Aboriginal influence upon plant communities in Cape York Peninsula. Archaeol. Oceania, 1982, 17, 38-50.
4. Ramakrishnan, P. S., Shifting Agriculture and Sustainable Development: An Interdisciplinary Study from North-Eastern India, UNESCO-MAB Series, Paris, Parthenon Publ., UK (republished by Oxford University Press, New Delhi 1993), 1992, p. 424.
5. Swift, M. J., Vandermeer, J., Ramakrishnan, P. S., Anderson, J. M., Ong, C. K. and Hawkins, B., Biodiversity and agroecosysem function. In Functional Roles of Biodiversity: A Global Perspective (eds Mooney, H. A. et al.), SCOPE Series, John Wiley, UK, 1996, pp. 261-298.
6. Sharma, U. C., Some indigenous farming systems of Northeast India. Asian Agri-Hist., 1997, 1, 267-274.
7. Nautiyal, C. S., Chauhan, P. S. and Nene, Y. L., Medicinal smoke reduces airborne bacteria. J. Ethnopharmacol., 2007, 114, 446-451.